[Reader-list] USA goes it alone, again...
rustam
rustam at cseindia.org
Fri Dec 14 16:53:45 IST 2001
The irony of George Bush's "Either you are with us or against us"
syndrome.
>From The Lancet, to be published on 15 December 2001.
USA goes it alone again on bioweapons convention
A conference to review the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention
(BWC) ended in disarray on Dec 8 after the USA shocked even
close allies by intensifying its opposition to a globally agreed
inspection regime.
In the closing hours of the 144-nation meeting, the US delegation
submitted a surprise proposal declaring the work of a special ad
hoc committee, which has spent the past 7 years drawing up a 210-
page protocol with detailed verification methods to monitor
compliance with the bioweapons ban, was "terminated".
To avert total failure, Tibor Toth--a Hungarian diplomat who chaired
the negotiations--suspended the conference for 1 year, saying he
hoped governments would come back with a better appreciation of
the ramifications of the anthrax attacks in the USA. "Too little time
has elapsed since the anthrax incident", said Toth.
Caught unawares by the American proposal, the European Union
said it "deeply regretted" the collapse of the meeting. "It left
everybody shocked and stunned", said Indian Ambassador Rakesh
Sood, summing up the general mood of the 3-week conference,
which is normally held every 5 years to review progress in the 1972
convention.
The BWC was drawn up during the Cold War era. It lacked
enforcement provisions because, at the time, the risk of attack was
considered minimal.
During the review meeting, governments from Russia, China,
Europe, and developing countries pleaded for the ad hoc
committee's verification protocol as the best protection against
bioterrorism, as did humanitarian, medical, and scientific non-
governmental organisations. The USA effectively pulled out of the
ad hoc committee talks this summer (see Lancet 2001; 358: 389),
saying the proposed inspection system would expose US defence
and commercial biotechnology secrets to enemies and rivals. But
many countries hoped the Sept 11 terrorist attacks and the
anthrax mail scare would prompt the Bush administration to come
back on board.
Instead, US delegation leader John Bolton proposed a new
approach: to authorise the UN Secretary General to order
inspections of "noncompliant BWC state parties" while leaving the
five permanent Security Council members with veto powers to
prevent themselves being investigated.
Bolton accused Iraq of violating the biological weapons ban, saying
its programme was "beyond dispute"--a charge rejected by the
Baghdad government as a US pretext for setting up military action
against Iraq. He also maintained that North Korea, Libya, Syria,
Iran, and Sudan were at various stages of bioweapons
development.
But the US proposal found few takers and left arms-control experts
and observers lamenting its refusal to join the multilateral treaty.
"This outcome leaves us all worse off", said Oliver Meier, Senior
Arms Control and Disarmament Researcher at the Verification
Research, Training and Information Centre (VERTIC). "While US
citizens are dying from biological weapons, even the most modest
proposals to strengthen the bioweapons ban were not acceptable
to Washington."
By Clare Kapp
Copyright by The Lancet. For personal use only. Not to be
reproduced commercially without consent by The Lancet.
****************************************************************
* NOTE CHANGE IN OUR EMAIL ADDRESS: PLEASE NOTE IT AS FOLLOWS *
****************************************************************
CENTRE FOR SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT ( CSE )
41, TUGHLAKABAD INSTITUTIONAL AREA, NEW DELHI- 110 062
TELE: 608 1110, 608 1124
608 3394, 608 6399
FAX : 91-11-608 5879
VISIT US AT: http://www.cseindia.org
Email: rustam at cseindia.org
****************************************************************
More information about the reader-list
mailing list