[Reader-list] [Fwd] Edward Said on Israel/Palestine
rustam
rustam at cseindia.org
Mon Apr 1 14:42:26 IST 2002
Subject: Edward Said on Israel/Palestine
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:44:47 -0500 (EST)
March 24 - March 30, 2002 What Price Oslo?
By Edward Said
The television images on Al-Jazeera have been burningly clear.
There is a kind of Palestinian heroism in evidence there that
makes this the story of our time. An entire army, navy, and air
force supplied munificently and
unconditionally by the United States have been wreaking
destruction on the 18 per cent of the West Bank and 60 per cent
of Gaza afforded Palestinians after ten years of negotiations with
Israel and the US.
Palestinian hospitals, schools, refugee camps and civilian
residences have been at the receiving end of a merciless, criminal
assault by Israeli troops huddled inside their helicopter gun-ships,
F-16's and Merkavas, and still the poorly armed resistance
fighters take on this preposterously more powerful force
undaunted and unyielding.
In the US, CNN and newspapers like The New York Times fail,
to their discredit, to ever mention that "the violence" is uneven and
that there aren't two sides involved here, but only one state turning
all its great power against a stateless, repeatedly refugeed, and
dispossessed people, bereft of arms and real leadership, with the
aim of destroying this people, "dealing them a terrible blow" as the
war criminal who leads Israel shamelessly put it.
As an index of how deranged Sharon has become, I might quote
here what he said to Ha'aretz on 5 March: "The PA is behind the
terror, it's all terror. Arafat is behind the terror. Our pressure is
aimed at ending the terror. Don't expect Arafat to act against the
terror. We have to cause them heavy casualties and then they'll
know they can't keep using terror and win political achievements."
Besides symptomatically revealing the workings of an obsessed
mind bent on destruction and sheer, adulterated hatred, Sharon's
words indicate the failures of reason and criticism loosed on the
world since last September.
Yes, there was a terrorist outrage, but there's more to the world
than terror. There is politics, and struggle, and history, and
injustice, and resistance and yes, state terror as well. With
scarcely a peep from the American professorate or intelligentsia,
we have all succumbed to the promiscuous misuse of language
and sense, by which everything we don't like has become terror
and what we do is pure and simple good -- fighting terror, no
matter how much wealth, and lives, and destruction is involved.
Swept away are all the Enlightenment precepts by which we
attempt to educate our students and our-fellow citizens, replaced
by a disproportionate orgy of vindictiveness and self-righteous
wrath of the kind that only the wealthy and the powerful, it would
seem, have the right to use and act upon. No wonder then that a
fourth-rate thug like Sharon feels entitled (by emulation and
derivation) to do what he does when in the greatest democracy on
earth, laws, constitutional rights, writs of habeas corpus and
reason itself are consigned to the rubbish bin in the pursuit of
terror and terrorism. As educators and as citizens, we have failed
in our mission by allowing ourselves to be bamboozled in this way,
without so much as an organised public discussion about a
defence budget that has shot up to $400 billion while 40 million
people remain without health insurance.
Israelis, Arabs and Americans are told that love of country
requires such expenditures and such destruction because a good
cause is at stake. Nonsense. What is at stake are material
interests that keep rulers in power, corporations making profits,
people in a state of manufactured consent, just so long as they
don't get up one morning and start to think about where, in this
mad technologised rush to bomb and kill, we are going.
Israel is now waging a war against civilians, pure and simple,
although you will never hear it put that way in the US. This is a
racist war, and in its strategy and tactics, a colonial one as well.
People are being killed and made to suffer disproportionately
because they are not Jews. What an irony!
Yet CNN never refers to "occupied" territories (always rather to
"violence in Israel" as if the main battlefields are the concert halls
and cafes of Tel Aviv and not in fact the ghettoes and besieged
refugee camps of Palestine that have already been surrounded by
150 illegal Israeli settlements). For the past ten years, the great
fraud of Oslo was foisted on the world by the US, with hardly an
awareness that only 18 per cent of the West Bank were given up,
and 60 per cent of Gaza. No one knows geography and it's better
not to know, since the reality on the ground is so astonishing,
considering the verbal hoopla and self-congratulation.
And that pseudo-pundit -- the insufferably conceited Thomas
Friedman -- still has the gall to say that "Arab TV" shows one-
sided pictures, as if "Arab TV" should be showing things from
Israel's point-of-view the way CNN does, with "Mid-East
violence" the catch-all word for the ethnic cleansing that Israel is
wreaking on the Palestinians in their ghettoes and camps.
Has Friedman (or CNN for that matter) ever tried to point out the
difference between an attacking army fighting a colonial war on
the territory of the people it has occupied for 35 years, and the
people defending themselves against that butchery? Of course
not, for indeed why should Friedman ever bother to say honestly
that there is no Palestinian occupation, there are no Palestinian F-
16's, no Apache helicopters, no gunboats, no Merkava tanks, in
short, no Palestinian occupation of Israel.
So much for Friedman's credentials as an honest commentator
and reporter who has utterly failed, in unadorned terms, to explain
the US view or to understand the Arab and Palestinian cause.
Can he not see that he and his writings are part of the problem,
that in their maundering self-justifications and the dishonesty in
which he shows no sign of the self-criticism he keeps hectoringly
expecting of others, he actually aggravates the ignorance and the
misperceptions rather than reducing them?
Poor journalist and educator, he. The picture you get here is that
Israelis are battling for their lives instead of for their settlements
and military bases on the occupied lands of Palestine. No maps
have been run for months in the American media. On 8 March,
hitherto the bloodiest day for
Palestinians of the 16-month Intifada, CNN's main evening news
specified the death of 40 "people" and failed even to mention the
death of several Red Crescent workers killed while their
ambulances were prevented by Israeli tanks from getting to the
wounded. Just "people," and no pictures of the hell they've been
living in this the 35th year of military occupation. Tul Karm is
undergoing a siege of sieges with 24 hour curfews, electricity and
water cut-off, systematic round-ups and the removal of 800young
men, the wanton smashing of refugee houses, wholesale
destruction of property (and I'm not speaking of nightclubs or
sports facilities but of shacks and lean-tos that furnished twice
displaced refugees with hovels for bare subsistence) and limitless
cases of sadistic cruelty to unarmed and undefended civilians who
are pushed and beaten and left to bleed to death, women allowed
to give birth to stillborn babies while they wait needlessly at Israeli
road-blocks, old men made to strip and take off their shoes and
walk barefoot for a gum-chewing 18-year-old waving around an
M-16 that my taxes have paid for.
Bethlehem, its town center and university destroyed, flattened at
5,000 feet by valiant Israeli bombers swooshing in with their
marvelous F-16's which I've paid for too. Balata camp, Aida and
Dheheisheh and Azza Camps, the tiny villages of Khadr and
Husam, all battered into rubble without even a mention by the US
press, whose New York editors so obviously have no problems
with it, with a few exceptions here and there.
The uncounted dead and wounded, the unburied and unassisted, to
say nothing of the hundreds of thousands of lives maimed,
distorted, catastrophically marked by wantonly caused suffering,
all of it ordered at a safe distance from the action in leafy, calm
West Jerusalem by men for whom the West Bank and Gaza are
distant rat holes filled with insects and rodents that must be
"subdued" and driven out, taught a lesson in the accepted jargon of
Israel's superb military. On Tuesday, in the biggest attack of all,
Ramallah has been invaded and is being ravaged by 140 Israeli
tanks, thus completing Israel's re-conquest of the already-
occupied Palestinian territories.
The Palestinian people are paying the heavy, heavy
unconscionable price of Oslo, which after 10 years of negotiating
left them with bits of land lacking coherence and continuity,
security institutions designed to assure their subservience to Israel,
and a life that impoverished them so that the Jewish state could
thrive and prosper. In vain during those 10 years did some of us
warn that the distance between the US-Israeli language of peace
and the appalling realities on the ground was never bridged, never
even intended to be bridged. Words and phrases like "peace
process" and "terrorism" took hold without reference to any real
referent. Land confiscations were either overlooked or referred to
as "bilateral negotiations" that were taking place between a state
consolidating its hold on territory it wanted at all costs, and a
mediocre set of uninformed negotiators whom it took four years to
acquire, much less use, a reliable map of the land they were
negotiating over. The worst misrepresentation of all is that in the
54 years since 1948, never has a narrative of Palestinian heroism
and suffering been allowed to emerge. We are all depicted as
violent fanatic extremists who are little more than the terrorists
that George Bush and his cabal have imposed on the
consciousness of a stunned and systematically misinformed
population, aided and uncritically abetted by an entire army of
commentators and media stars -- the Blitzers, Zahns, Lehrers,
Rathers, Brokaws, Russerts, and their ilk.
The Israeli lobby is scarcely needed with such faithful disciples
trailing happily in its ranks. But now that the Saudi peace proposal
has become the point of discussion and of hope, it is necessary, I
think, to put it in its real, as opposed to its supposed, context. First
of all, this is the re-cycled Reagan plan of 1982, the Fahd Plan of
1983, the Madrid plan of 1991, and so on: in other words, it
follows a series of plans many times put forward which in the end
both Israel and the US have not only refused to implement, but
have actively torpedoed. The way I see it, the only negotiations
worth having should be on the phases of a total Israeli withdrawal
and not, as was the case with Oslo, bargaining over what pieces
of land Israel was willing very grudgingly to give up. There's been
too much Palestinian blood spilled, too much Israeli contempt and
racist violence dispensed for any serious return to Oslo-style
negotiations brokered by that most biased of honest brokers, the
United States. Everyone is aware, however, that the old
Palestinian negotiators haven't given up on their dreams and
illusions, and that meetings have been occurring throughout the
raids and bombings.
But I would argue that due weight be given to decades of
Palestinian suffering and the real human costs of Israel's
destructive policies before any negotiations accord undue status to
Israeli governments that have trampled on Palestinian rights the
way they have demolished our houses and killed our people. Any
Arab-Israeli negotiations that do not factor in history -- and for
this task a team of historians, economists, and geographers with a
conscience are needed -- are not worth having, just as
Palestinians must now elect a new set of negotiators and
representatives in the hope of salvaging something from the
present calamity.
In short, in whatever meetings that now occur between Israeli and
Palestinian representatives, the gravity of Israeli depredations
against our people has to be given attention and not simply
brushed aside as so much past history. Oslo, in effect, pardoned
the occupation, excusing it for all the buildings and lives destroyed
over the first 25 years of occupation. After so much further
suffering, Israel cannot be excused and allowed to walk away
from the table with not even a rhetorical demand that it needs to
atone for what it did. I will be told that politics is about what is
possible, not about what is desired, and that we should be grateful
to get even a small Israeli pullback. I disagree strongly.
Negotiations can only be about when the total withdrawal will
take place, not what percentage Israel is willing to concede. A
conqueror and a vandal cannot concede anything: he must simply
return what he's taken and pay for the abuses that are his
responsibility to bear, just as Saddam Hussein should and did pay
for his occupation of Kuwait. We are still a considerable distance
from that goal, although in the meantime the extraordinary
unbowed bravery of all Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank
has in effect politically and morally defeated Sharon, who will lose
his seat in the not too distant future. But, that in two decades his
armies can invade Arab cities at will, killing and sowing
destruction without so much as a collective Arab peep speaks
reams for the Arab world's leaders.
Lastly, what the various Arab rulers who are so delicately silent
now while Palestine is being raped on TV think they are doing, I
don't know, but I can imagine that deepin their souls they must
feel no small amount of shame and disgrace. Powerless militarily,
politically, economically and above all morally, they have little
credibility and no real standing, except as obedient pawns on the
American-Israeli chessboard. Perhaps they feel they are playing a
waiting game. Perhaps. But they (like Arafat and his men)
haven't learned the power of systematically disseminated
information as a way of protecting their people from the
onslaughts of those who consider all Arabs militant, extremist,
terrorist fanatics. The good news is that the time for that sort of
irresponsible and contemptible behavior is very short. Will the new
generation do any better? It is for a whole new attitude toward
secular education to decide the answer, whether collectively we
go down again to disorganisation, corruption and mediocrity or
whether at last we can become a nation.
****************************************************************
* NOTE CHANGE IN OUR EMAIL ADDRESS: PLEASE NOTE IT AS FOLLOWS *
****************************************************************
CENTRE FOR SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT ( CSE )
41, TUGHLAKABAD INSTITUTIONAL AREA, NEW DELHI- 110 062
TELE: 608 1110, 608 1124
608 3394, 608 6399
FAX : 91-11-608 5879
VISIT US AT: http://www.cseindia.org
Email: rustam at cseindia.org
****************************************************************
More information about the reader-list
mailing list