[Reader-list] AMERICAN AGGRESSION AGAINST IRAQ - WHO IS TERRORIST?

[Faizan Ahmed]

AMERICAN AGGRESSION AGAINST IRAQ - WHO IS TERRORIST?



Asghar Ali Engineer



(Islam and Modern Age April, 2003)



(I)



The aggression against Iraq by President Bush of America and Prime Minister
 Blair of the U.K. has attracted worldwide condemnation and rightly so. The
 forces of these two countries are ruthlessly bombarding Iraq. Even market
 places and civilian buildings have not been spared - probably deliberately
 targeted. Hundreds of civilians have been killed in last two weeks. More
 they (USA and U.K.) get frustrated more ruthlessly they bomb particularly
 Baghdad. And ironically now it is Bush and Blaire who are villains and
 President Saddam Hussain who is a hero.



This raises one question - who is greater terrorist - Osama bin Laden or Bush
 and Blaire? When the New York twin towers were attacked on 9/11 the world
 media raised hell and condemned not only bin Laden (which would have been
 justified) but Islam itself and equated Islam with terrorism. There were
 host of articles in leading news papers and magazines round the world
 condemning Islam as responsible for terrorism and that Islam is a violent
 religion which urges upon its followers to wage jihad.



Now that President Bush is committing all these crimes against humanity in
 the name of 'liberating Iraq' who shall we blame for it? Osama bin Laden was
 of course an individual, a head of al-Qaida, an organisation floated by
 Osama himself, and not elected by any people or Muslims of the world or any
 country, for that matter. Even then American media wrote as if all Muslims
 were responsible for the crime committed by Osama.



Can the crimes against humanity being committed by Bush - an elected
 representative of USA - on the people of Iraq  be blamed on Christianity
 since he invokes Christianity, like Osama who invoked Islam for the crime he
 committed against three thousand or so people working in those towers. Bush
 is also invoking Christianity but organising Christian prayers in White
 House or conducting the Bible study circles and invoking God time and again?



No, clear no. Christianity or Christians are in no way responsible for what
 Bush is doing. Like Osama, Bush himself alone is responsible for his crimes.
 His greed for oil makes him shed pints of human blood. And, let us make no
 mistake, it is not oil alone. He is being backed in his crimes by scores of
 American multi-nationals, apart from Israel, are also backing this
 aggression against the innocent people of Iraq. The military-industrial
 complex is well known for its greed for money and this formidable
 combination in the USA keeps war machinery going in one part of the third
 world or the other so that it can make tonnes of money.  The Zionists of
 Israel also are powerful block urging American ruling establishment to
 destroy the Arab countries around them so that it can fulfill its
 expansionist dreams.



It is well known that whenever vested interests want to grab power or someone
 elses wealth or property they invoke God on their side and create religious
 sanctions to legitimise their misdeeds. Laden and Bush-Blaire are no
 different in this respect. If one examines the terminology being used by
 Bush-Blaire it makes things abundantly clear.



Bush makes it out as if he is doing all this to 'liberate' Iraq from a
 dictator. Mr. Blaire also recently said when confronted by some for killing
 innocent civilians said that one had to pay this price for ridding this
 world of dictators. If such wars are not fought, the world, according to
 Bush and Blair will be full of dictators. What an excuse for war. As if
 America has not supported dictators in Asia, Africa and Latin America all
 these years.



These dictators have committed worst crimes against their people with full
 support of American ruling establishment for years during cold war. Mr.
 Blaire is also fully aware of all this. And yet today America wants to
 project itself as champion of Iraq's liberation by getting it rid of Saddam
 Husain.



America has been demanding for years now that Iraq be disarmed and weapons of
 mass destruction (WMD) be destroyed. Now this war of aggression has clearly
 shown who possesses weapons of mass destruction Iraq or America? America is
 the only nation in possession of huge piles of WMD, no one else. It can
 destroy the world several times over. It has used these weapons in several
 countries in killing innocent people. In Hiroshima-Nagasaki it killed
 hundreds of thousands of people, in Vietnam it killed unarmed peasants
 working in their fields. For what? To destroy communism.



What kind of liberty it wants - liberty for people or liberty for American
 ruling establishment to loot and exploit poorer nations? However, though
 American ruling establishments have been using rhetoric of freedom only to
 establish their hegemony all over the world. To retain this hegemony it can
 destroy all those who come in its way. As far as America is concerned the
 words like freedom, liberty, human rights and so on are nothing but empty
 rhetoric. Any person of common sense knows this.



As for WMD America has been insisting on this for last 13 years. Who does not
 know that America had supplied technology to Iraq to manufacture poisonous
 gases so that these weapons could be used against Iran to destroy Khomeini's
 revolution. It was American ruling establishment, which wanted to use Iraq
 to destroy Islamic revolution in Iran. It is for this reason that Bush is so
 sure that Iraq posses WMD. USA itself had supplied this technology for its
 own selfish ends.



Iraq did try to develop nuclear capability for manufacturing weapons. But
 much before it could do so Israel destroyed Iraq's nuclear plant through air
 raid. It was also an act of great aggression but USA allowed it and it
 allowed it with impunity. Unfortunately no other country condemned it, not
 even the Arab countries.



In the Arab countries all monarchs and Sheikhs who suppress democracy in
 these countries have been friends of American rulers as they serve American
 interests in a most servile way. America has launched its war of aggression
 from Kuwait and without support from Kuwait and without use of Kuwait
 territory it could not have launched this aggression against Iraq. Who is
 ruling over Iraq? Is the Sheikh of Kuwait not a dictator? Why then America
 so keen to support the ruling Sheikh in Kuwait? It is greatly handicapped
 since Turkey's Parliament did not allow USA to land its army in Turkey and
 launch invasion against Iraq from Turkey. Now Powel is on the visit to
 Turkey to persuade its rulers to allow American army to invade Northern
 Iraq.



Thus most of the Islamic countries do not have democracy today thanks to US
 support for dictators in Islamic countries. And in Iraq they want to
 establish 'democracy' and want to 'liberate' people of Iraq. US did not have
 time to study the social and political history of Iraq. People of Iraq may
 or may not like Saddam but they do love their country, their nation. They
 will not allow outside aggressors to 'liberate' them.



It is heartening to note that unlike the cold war era people cannot be easily
 deceived now  by deceptive rhetoric. The US and U.K. ruling establishments
 can no longer deceive people of their own countries by this deceptive
 rhetoric of 'democratic values' and 'liberating' people of  'corrupt and
 ruthless dictatorship'. People today can easily understand the real intent
 of aggressors and their naked interests. In fact the American aggression
 against Iraq is any time worse than 19th century colonial invasions of
 European countries.



Earlier the Christian church used to remain silent as USA often used
 anti-Communist rhetoric to invade other countries. This time in the absence
 of any communist power USA cannot deceive Christian Church to justify its
 aggression against Iraq. The Churches, both Catholic and Protestant, did not
 buy American position and have protested, in most cases, vehemently, against
 war against Iraq. The Pope appealed to his followers throughout world to
 fast on a particular day to protest aggression against Iraq. The World
 Council of Churches has also issued a strongly worded statement against the
 USA for its war against Iraq. Many Catholics in Latin America are also
 strongly condemning the US for launching aggression against Iraq. Some
 activists of these churches even tried to appeal for forming human shield in
 Iraq against American bombing.



Such an act of solidarity by the Christian Churches is a matter of great
 significance and must be enthusiastically welcome by all concerned. Bush's
 Christian rhetoric thus cannot deceive anyone. God is being invoked by Bush
 (the American soldiers have been asked to pray every day and even send their
 prayers to White House as if they are fighting a 'just' war and God is on
 their side. God cannot be on the side of those who kill innocent civilians
 who have nothing to do with either Bush' vested interests or Saddam's
 political designs. These innocent people want to live in peace.



Christ is considered the prince of peace and he cannot be on the side of
 aggressors who kill innocent people ruthlessly even though they may take his
 name thousand times. Christ always talked of peace and was always on the
 side of the oppressed. According to the Bible the meek shall inherit the
 earth. The Qur'am also says the same thing in 28:5. Thus the Church is on
 the side of the poor and weak and so is the Qur'an. It is only the vested
 interests and the powerful are on the side of Bush and Blaire, none else.



We also have to reflect deeply about the way our democracies are functioning.
 Democracy tends to become pocket borough of the rich and the powerful. They
 can maneuver it quite successfully. The people of America, at least a large
 number of them, are against the war in Iraq. There have been huge
 demonstrations against war in New York, Washington and Los Angeles and so
 many other cities of America. Similarly there were massive protests against
 war in London and other cities of U.K. and yet the rulers in USA and UK went
 ahead with war dismissing these protests with contempt. Not only this these
 powerful individuals manipulate media and propagate lies and half -truths to
 legitimise their aggression against another country.



It is ironical that these very people criticise those countries, which lack
 democracy. America has declared war ostensibly to eliminate the dictator
 Saddam and gift people of Iraq 'democracy' so that they can enjoy 'freedom'.
 And Bush is even prepared to kill hundreds of innocent citizens of Iraq so
 that the people of Iraq can enjoy 'freedom and democracy'. It is also a
 matter to be reflected upon that due to such aggressive invasion against
 other countries the quality of democracy in USA is being eroded.



Dissent is no more tolerated by the Bush administration. While Bush is keen
 to gift freedom to the people of Iraq, he is unhesitatingly suppressing
 freedom at home. The police is pouncing upon the demonstrators against war
 and those journalists who do not agree with the analysis of war situation in
 Iraq are loosing their employment. The case of Mr. Peter Arnett, a veteran
 war reporter with the NBC T.V. has received enough attention worldwide.
 Since Mr. Arnett appeared on Baghdad T.V. and gave opinion that the war is
 not going as planned by the USA and its allies, lost his job.



It clearly indicates that democratic freedoms are under attack in USA. It has
 never happened before. After the terrorist attack on twin towers in New York
 democratic values have come under serious challenge. Of course it is for the
 people of America to struggle against such violations of democracy in their
 own country. They should not, under any circumstances allow McCarthian era
 to return.



It is difficult to predict the outcome of war in Iraq at this stage. America
 has terrible superiority of arms over Iraq. Iraq has been virtually disarmed
 over last one decade. A few weeks before war it was compelled to destroy its
 Samoud missiles having more than 150 kms range. It is virtually fighting
 against most powerful allies armed to teeth without arms. It now possesses
 only some outdated small arms.



It is irony of the situation that the country which possess most dreadful
 arms of mass destruction is considered 'champion of world freedom' and Iraq
 which hardly possessed any arms was being pressurised by the whole world to
 disarm and disclose all its weapons of mass destruction. In the region if
 any country possesses WMD it is Israel. Israel possesses all sorts of
 weapons including nuclear weapons. But since it is faithful ally of USA and
 guards its interests in the region, it is no threat to world security.
 According to American rule, those who threaten American interests are
 'threat' to world security.



Everyone knows the world has totally skewed structure and everyone bows
 before power and minds his interests. Principles and values are only to be
 invoked by the weak. The powerful has to dismiss such a discourse. America
 also uses human rights rhetoric when it comes to third world countries. But
 there too, if the regime is US friendly ths discourse can be dispensed with.



(II)



We would now like to turn our attention to the role of Islamic countries in
 this whole affair. There too Islamic rhetoric is used by vested interests to
 protect themselves. This Islamic rhetoric is, of course, meant for Muslim
 masses. The most obvious rhetoric used is of 'ummah'. Muslim ummah is
 supposed to be united like rock and stand up to all crises. However, such
 unity of ummah is never to be seen from earliest part of Islamic history.
 Muslim ummah split into various interest or sectarian groups with few years
 of Holy Prophet's death.



Such unity is no where to be seen since that early period. Today the ummah is
 as much divided with no signs of ever taking a united stand on any issue. On
 aggression against Iraq too Muslim countries are deeply divided.
 Unfortunately Kuwaiti rulers are more than eager to provide all facilities
 to the US and its allies to launch aggression from its territory. The Allied
 troops were first massed in Kuwait and all the provisions for the troops are
 also being supplied from there. Thus Kuwait is the lifeline for the Allied
 forces for their war against Iraq.



Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt also are amongst the supporters of the USA in
 the region. Though they are not actively helping the US they are all silent
 spectators. They are not even protesting, as it will harm their interests.
 Pakistan has also been cowed down and its military rulers are cooperating
 with the US. They are afraid of earning wrath of US masters. Syria is of
 course protesting and will invite wrath of America.



Of course the Muslim masses in these countries are seething with rage and are
 eager to help Iraq. In some countries like Pakistan Muslims are staging
 massive demonstrations under the leadership of Ulama. However, it is
 possible to demonstrate in Pakistan but people in other countries are not
 that lucky. In Saudi Arabia for example, though there is no less anger
 against America but they cannot even demonstrate and vent their spleen. The
 accumulated anger can have disastrous consequences.



It is also important to note that such acts of imperialist aggression that
 lead to terrorism in the Muslim world. There are two things, which are
 mainly responsible for promoting terrorism: acts of aggression against
 Muslim countries and suppression of democratic freedoms with the help of
 authoritarian rulers ready to align with the US.



Unfortunately Osama bin Laden's acts of terrorism thus find justification in
 the eyes of Muslims due to such acts of aggression on the part of US. Many
 people including Hasni Mubarak, President of Egypt are now suggesting that
 there will be many more Osamas now in the Islamic world. This will in turn
 be blamed on Islam and 'clash of civilisation' theory will find even more
 acceptability in the western world.



The technological progress has enabled nations like the USA, which want to
 dominate the world, to develop weapons of mass destruction and kill hundreds
 of thousands of people across the world. There is nothing to be proud of to
 be in 21st century. Even Chengez Khans of the medieval world could not have
 killed as many people as countries like USA are killing in wars today. In
 the two world wars in 20th century millions of people were killed because of
 this killer technology. We should feel ashamed that despite so much progress
 of science we have not been able to suppress our desire to rule or dominate
 over others at any cost. We have hardly succeeded in refining our aggressive
 instinct.



It is here that we need value based approach to our problems. Science without
 human values can be an unmitigated desire. From Hitler's Germany to
 Hiroshima to Vietnam to Iraq it has been long history of this unmitigated
 disaster. Unfortunately most of these people were killed in the name of
 saving democracy and freedom.



All religions of the world can be great boon for humanity if their leaders do
 not ally with vested interest as they have done in the past and stand by
 spiritual values like compassion and mitigating suffering. Like Buddhism and
 Christianity, Islam too, lays great emphasis on compassion and justice. The
 religious leaders across the world should come together to fight against
 mass killings by powerful nations of the world by invoking hollow words like
 freedom and democracy.



It is highly gratifying that religious leaders have given a call to protest
 against American designs in Iraq. Some of them even proposed human shield
 against ruthless American bombing. Unfortunately many Muslim religious
 leaders - though not all - are not showing, enough courage to give a call to
 resist American aggression in Iraq. Islam is a great religion, which
 inspires people to fight against injustice, though not necessarily
 violently. We must use the concept of non-violent struggle to fight against
 injustices all over the world. It is the only way to fight terrorism too.



If Muslim religious leaders take initiative to promote non-violent resistance
 against such acts of aggression by USA and its allies, it will be a great
 service to humanity. It will save hundreds of innocent lives in future. If
 there is no such non-violent resistance which needs tremendous courage,
 likes of Osama will the bill again causing tremendous suffering to the
 people. We must impress on Muslims that taking innocent lives is an
 un-Islamic act (5:32). Also, a Muslim has to act with wisdom (Allah is
 Hakim) and has to suppress his/her anger (3:134). Suppressing anger,
 however, does not mean compromising with injustice but to elevate it to
 higher form and combining it with wisdom and using on-violent means so as to
 save human lives and minimise human suffering while fighting against
 injustices.



Let us hope our religious leaders would not issue fatwas resulting even in
 more human suffering and would give creative lead to struggle against
 injustices being inflicted on Muslim world by America in its arrogance of
 power. In the Qur'anic language America is resorting to istikbar and Allah
 brings downfall of all mustakbirin (arrogant rulers drunk with power) and
 this downfall can be hastened by human agents acting with wisdom.

**********************************

Institute of Islamic Studies,

Mumbai:- 400 055.