[Reader-list] Re: [Urbanstudy] city and sexuality

[sadan]

On Pathology and Interesting: 
I agree with you, Shree.  But interesting may not always convey 
positive/moralist... attractions. Pathology has its own attraction. violence 
has its own zones of engagements. Thus pathetic and interesting are not 
always in contradiction with each other. I agree with your main body of 
comments. 

Thanks
sadan.
On Friday 14 February 2003 12:08 pm, you wrote:
> P.S.
>
> P.S.
>
> Pathetic, not interesting.
> Why the love and only the real love is not the ingredient of
> marriage?
> To hell with this verginity syndrome, which forces the female to
> claim the fraud.
>
> shree
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 sadan wrote :
> >Dear friends,
> >just read an ineteresting report and thought to share with you.
> >The HIndustan Times, Tuesday, March 7, 1940, p.4.
> >" His virgin Bride Turns out to be a Married Woman.
> >Delhi Thursday: Mr. Ved Prakash Gautama, Megistrate, convicted
> >one Ghisa
> >yesterday under section 420, IPC (cheating) and sentenced him to
> >undergo
> >rigorous imprisonment for one year. The allegation against the
> >accused was
> >that he got an already married gujjar woman married to a Brahman
> >in Qarol
> >Bagh telling him that she was a Brahman virgin."
> >
> >no spin this time.
> >thanking you.
> >sadan.
> >_______________________________________________
> >Urbanstudygroup mailing list
> >Urban Study Group: Reading the South Asian City