[Reader-list] Opening the Digital
Oli
oli at zeromail.org
Wed Dec 29 20:36:41 IST 2004
Dear all,
as the IP-conference in Delhi is coming closer, I have been reading
articles on the subject, like probably others on this list too. You all
know the ambivalent term "digital divide", which is on high circuit in
development agendas.
In opposition to a moral, paternalistic discourse backed by Microsoft and
others, I am looking for a different perspective on the issue of 'the
digital'. The general idea is not to fall into the trap of the discourse of
the 'digital divide' like it is held by the UNO with its World Summit on
Information Society (WSIS).
Not taking for granted any meaning of 'the digital' and its relations to
societies, the term 'digital inequalities' is proposed, which is nothing
but a container of questions, so far. With this, I tried to step back and
look for a variety of questions, which give us an idea of the multifaceted
thing called 'the digital'.
I invite everyone on the list to comment, add and critique. As my stay at
sarai is connected to a work on 'digital inequalities', I would be happy to
get some feedback. I've just started to sketch a framework of questions.
There is no determining goal. It's supposed to be processual work.
The questions below don't cover the whole topic, and also some of them
might be pure nonsense.
Digital Inequalities concern a wide field of consequences, that emerge when
the Digital has become the dominant signifier for modern life and when it
reshapes societies. But it is necessary to understand that Digital
Inequalities are not solely, maybe even not at all, social inequalities.
They arise within the whole spectre of the questions below. Digital
Inequalities will not stop when everyone is connected. Digital Inequalities
are subject to every single individual's lust, skills and curiosity to
explore the Digital. The local dispositivs* one is related to are affected
by and affect the Digital. Speaking of global digital inequalities does not
make much sense. Saying that it is a digital inequality that in the U.S.
far more connected users exist than in Angola is redundant. A digital
inequalitiy has a wide horizon of parameters, most of them will remain
unknown if the term is continued being used an essentialist concept, that
leaves no space for questions. Digital Inequalities are a net of relations
that relies on previous relations.
* Dispositiv is a concept by Foucault which -in very short- refers to the
adjusting of power relations when any kind of change in society occurs. It
reconnects loose threads to e.g. economy. it fills the gap, that emerged
through e.g. technological changes. I am not sure about the english
translation. The french word is 'dispositif'.
1. --- Changes ----
The search for a language and concepts of the Digital era hasn't even begun.
The Digital is not the opposite or other half of a binary digital / analog,
but a different state of things.
2. ---- Everyday life and the Digital ----
What kind of relations exist between people and the Digital exist?
What do these relations stand for?
Digital practices in everyday life
In which ways does the Digital affect your life?
3. ---- Imaginaries of the Digital ----
What are our Digital dreams?
Lust for power in the metaphors of the Digital: cyberspace, world wide web,
...
4. ---- The Future and the Digital ----
What timeregime does the Digital impose upon users? (e.g. organism's stress
with the Digital)
What would be a contempary usage of the Digital? (that does not just use it
as a simulation of old media/ analog? How boring is that: using the
computer as a telephone...)
A philosophy of Digital history. What would that be?
The Digital as a simulation machine that ends history?
Possible futures of the Digital
What is the (conceptual) relation of postmodernity and the Digital?
Future subjectivities shaped by the Digital
5. ---- Aspects of Power in the Digital era ----
Don't believe the hype! The strata of control and surveillance are much
about the making of compatible, governable subjectivities.
Connecting everyone as a sequel of counting populations and making up
identities.
Dispositivs of the Digital: subjectivities, relations, economics. Which
older dispositivs take a backseat when the dispositiv of the Digital is in
state of action?
A historical research on the shaping of contempory life that concentrates
on the left-outs through the Digital. What have we missed because of the
Digital?
The speed of light is not suitable for organisms: The Digital as an
accelerator of some aspects of modern life.
Paternalistic politics: the imperative of being connected
Some languages preferred: english as a structural component of Digital
inequalities.
Interesting: the delay of the implementation of local languages is not
caused by technical problems. So whats the problem then?
Examples of use against intention
the 'gating' of information: the re-use of old concepts in the Digital,
which is a field with different structures.
6. ---- Conflicts between old concepts and the Digital -----
Privacy under the Digital: In which ways does the concept of privacy
change? (Obviously, the privacy concept, which derived from the "rights of
the individual" in bourgeois liberalism is outdated in the digital era, as
it is everywhere in decline)
Digital illiteracy: a concept from the enlightment needs modification in
the Digital era.
The reign of the Digital. Are we already cyborgs and just don't know yet,
because we are stuck to ideas of humanism?
Data is not Information. The production of meaningless data is a psychic
affair, rooted in the modern believe of knowledge.
7. --- Micro-political steps towards the making of digital-wise relatedness
---
The handbook for Digital independence. What could that be?
Making up tales and stories about the Digital is fighting the imperialism
of the meaning machine
Strategies for a situated knowledge in a hyper-hysterical society: why
shall i write an email when i can talk to the person?
Networking our ways: inequalities of participation through non-access?
Health advisories for life in the Digital era / Offline and pottery
Losing fear of the Digital technique / queering the digital.
Examples of use against intention: fooling the engineers
------------
cheers, Oli
More information about the reader-list
mailing list