[Reader-list] re: reader, boell, lab, adorno, jail, textz.com
fmadre at free.fr
fmadre at free.fr
Fri Feb 27 19:35:15 IST 2004
- Previous message: [Reader-list] re: reader, boell, lab, adorno, jail, textz.com
- Next message: [Reader-list] re: reader, boell, lab, adorno, jail, textz.com
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Selon Andreas Broeckmann <abroeck at transmediale.de>:
> or are you saying that
> copyright ownership should be restricted to people who produce
> copyrightable materials??
neither, I was adressing your question gearing the answer towards our once
beloved "gift economy". which would imply that people who want to use my car
because they claim I don't own it should in turn, or somehow, expect to be
challenged about what they are injecting into this system
and what's The Big Night? - please, try to
> explain that again.)
"Le grand soir" refers to a fantasmagoric moment when the Revolution happens
and the morning after that there is no property and ownership, andreas, do you
remember all that future ? it was great.
I do believe, joking apart, that there is no answer to your question of the
casual car user in our present time and organization of society; it is the old
question of the possibility of establishing communism in one country of the
world only. All this is history, we have to make do with the reality of our
capitalist world and try to steer things in another direction which is now
totally out of theoretical reach, by that I mean that there is no one producing
coherent thought about a different global organization of this world. there is,
at best, a joyous bazar of communautarist reformism rolling its televized
circus around the globe.
> conscientious-objector-answer for your question is: 'i exert my right
> to self-defense and stop them by the least necessary means'.
thanks, I know (and I was not asking you, ah ah), but I've seen righteous
people struggling on TV when confronted with that, with millions of watchers
awaiting for a "human" answer to an inhuman question
that was ages ago too
> why are you saying that it is unfair to raise the question about
> 'something you own yourself'?
because I do not know what you mean by "own yourself"
and if I begin to think forward about what the notion of "own yourself"
ultimately brings to human beings, well, I have to discard this concept real
fast.
f.
- Previous message: [Reader-list] re: reader, boell, lab, adorno, jail, textz.com
- Next message: [Reader-list] re: reader, boell, lab, adorno, jail, textz.com
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the reader-list
mailing list