[Reader-list] [Announcements] Resolution on Mumbai Mill Lands
GIRNI KAMGAR
announcer at crit.org.in
Wed Feb 16 20:04:03 IST 2005
Resolution by participants in the seminar
TOWARDS A COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION TO THE ISSUE OF MILL LANDS
Wednesday 16 February 2005, Mumbai
WE, citizens and stakeholders in the city of Mumbai (list of
signatories below) who are gathered here, resolved to place the
following resolution before the Government of Maharashtra for immediate
consideration:
The Mill Lands are the historic industrial core of today’s Mumbai
Metropolitan Region. As the city authorities and state government seek
to makeover Mumbai into a global city, the government has not
recognised that these valuable lands were entrusted to mill owners to
develop the textile industry and provide employment, not to speculate
in real estate. This important fact has been repeatedly overlooked in
the rush by mill owners and builders to cash in on the commercial value
of the Mill Lands. In 1991, the Maharashtra Government addressed the
issue by allowing sale and development of mill lands under certain
conditions, framed in the Development Control Regulations of Greater
Mumbai (DCR). In Section 58 of the DCR (1991) mill lands were to be
shared in more or less equal thirds between the Municipal Corporation
of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) for civic amenities; Maharashtra Housing Area
Development Authority (MHADA), for public housing; and the owners for
modernisation and development of the mills.
This DCR was amended in 2001, and a provision introduced that within
the land provided for public housing, 50% would be set aside for
housing textile workers, and an additional provision made for job
opportunities for the family members of the textile workers. These
provisions were included in response to demands made by the textile
workers, who lost their jobs due to mill closures in Central Mumbai.
However these provisions will only be on paper, since the land now made
available under the amended DCR is so miniscule.
In the amended DCR of 2001, the land share of the mill owners has
increased several times beyond the original one third. The land share
of the MCGM, meant for creating open spaces and other facilities, as
well as the land share for MHADA meant for public housing, have been
reduced by more 90%, often to nil. This was done by making the one
third divisions applicable only to vacant open land in the mills, and
removing land on which structures are, or were, standing, from the
purvey of the one third division. This would have made sense if the
mills were still running. Since the mills are closed, the land made
available should logically be the entire land, not just open spaces or
those on which structures stood. These structures have been or are
being demolished, to make space for a real estate bonanza for mill
owners and builders, development which gives nothing to the workers, or
the city at large.
The closure of the mills has already deprived the workers their
livelihood. The new modifications proposed to the DCR, while claiming
to strengthen these rights, will actually hand over the mill lands to
the owners, to do as they wish. The proposed amendments to DCR will
also deprive the citizens of Mumbai of badly needed open spaces in a
congested city. We maintain that the textile mill lands are different
from other kinds of industrial land in the city, and require different
treatment.
We also feel that the amendments to the DCR do not constitute, as the
Government claims, minor modifications in the Maharashtra Regional and
Town Planning Act (1966). Any planning of 600 acres of land in the
centre of the city constitutes a major issue. The modified DCR is an
attack on citizens rights to space and workers rights to livelihood.
The committee recently appointed by the Government of Maharashtra and
chaired by Deepak Parekh to inquire into the mill lands issue is
compromised by the interests of mill owners, builders and financial
institution. Any representation by textile workers on the committee is
conspicuously absent.
We therefore demand that:
1. The land share of public housing and open spaces in mill lands, as
per the 1991 DCR, should be restored and stringently applied, not just
to vacant land or open spaces, but the total land area of the mills. It
should be seen that the 50% share for public housing is maintained for
textile workers, and the 2001 condition that workers families be given
jobs should also be retained and implemented.
2. The Government must immediately freeze the permissions for building
construction on the mill lands until the report of the Deepak Parekh
committee is released and discussed with the various stake-holders,
including mill workers and citizens groups. This should be implemented
with retrospective effect, applying to permissions already given under
the original 1991 and 2001 amended DCR.
3. The Government must disclose the list of the mills that have been
already given or to be given clearance for development or redevelopment
-- including intimations of dissaproval, commencement certificates,
approved/proposed drawings, true 7/12 extract of land ownership, and
related permissions -- along with their respective dates.
4. The Government must disclose, mill-wise, the list of the dues that
have been paid to the workers of the respective mills (or are still to
be paid) so that this amount can be juxtaposed against the profits
generated through the development of the mill land. This will help to
verify the stated rationale of the government that the increase in land
share through the modification of section 58 is to pay the workers
their dues.
5. The Government must publicly disclose all information on the land
ownership, leasehold and/or freehold status of the land, and the terms
and conditions/covenants of every mill. The terms of reference of the
Parekh committee should be extended in order to obtain and analyse the
rights associated with mill owners use of the mill lands.
6. For purposes of these demands and resolutions, the mill land being
considered includes both the mills of the National Textile Corporation
as well as private textile mills.
We resolve:
1. To set up an independent committee/study group of citizens groups,
workers organisations and labour and housing activists to investigate
into these issues and publish a report on its findings into the full
range of issues relating to the mill lands. This committee will access
all documents and information relating to land ownership, lease and
tenures, development plans and building proposals cleared under the
original and modified DC Rules. The committee will represent
independent views and have a wide terms of reference to include land
ownership, urban planning and comprehensive integrated area development
of the entire mill lands.
2. To distribute and publicise this set of demands and resolutions
across a broad section of the public, civic organisations and social
movements and to convene another meeting on the issue within a
fortnight of this meeting.
Signed by:
Girni Kamgar Sangharsh Samiti
Mumbai Study Group
Chemical Mazdoor Sabha
Workers Hind Textile Mills
Girangaon Rozgar Hakk Samiti
Majlis
Hind Mazdoor Sabha
Action for Good Governance and Networking in India ( AGNI)
CRIT (Collective Research Initiatives Trust)
Hindustan Siddhi Vinayak Kamgar Sangh
Bombay First
Textile Workers Federation of India
Zhopadpatti Bachao Parishad
LEARN and Aapli Mumbai
Combat Law
India Centre for Human Rights and Law (ICHRL)
Mumbai Citizens Group
FOCUS on the Global South
Praja Foundation
Yusuf Meherally Centre
Mumbai Port Trust (MbPT) Dock Kamgar and General Employees Union
Kamgar Aghadi
CITU (Centre for Indian Trade Unions)
NAPM (National Alliance of People’s Movements)
CED (Centre for Education and Documentation)
INTBAU India
Nivara Hakk Sangharsh Samiti
Mill Mazdoor Sangh
_____
CRIT (Collective Research Initiatives Trust) Announcements List
announcer at crit.org.in
http://lists.crit.org.in/mailman/listinfo/announcer
_______________________________________________
announcements mailing list
announcements at sarai.net
https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements
More information about the reader-list
mailing list