[Reader-list] Madurai
sou dhamini
soudhamini_1 at lycos.com
Fri Jan 21 15:10:34 IST 2005
Hi, Im giving below, a brief abstract of my project along with my
first posting.
MADURAI
Representations Old and New.
Project Abstract
An image of a city in peoples minds is made up as much by
statistical facts as by associations. In the Tamil consciousness,
Madurai is the First City, not Madras/Chennai. Pandyan capital,
seat of the Sangam, temple town, home of the jasmine flower -
malli, and sungudi sari, Madurai is both a mythic city and
a real one.
I use the word myth, in the sense that Roland Barthes does, as
a kind of speech. Like speech, myth is consensual and
generative. It stays in parlance and determines peoples ideas
and behaviour towards the world around them. It determines for
instance whether they feel a sense of belonging or alienation in a
city, as inhabitant or visitor.
What I seek to do is not to de-bunk the myth, but to become aware
of its many layers of significance. The image of the city that
will then emerge will be ideational rather than merely physical,
prismatic rather than two or even three dimensional.
I will be studying earlier images of the city as represented in
public culture and attempting to create my own, on digital video
ultimately, for public television.
First Pitch
I want to approach the city from two directions. From outside as
a visitor, researcher, explorer. And from the inside, through the
character of a young (fictional) girl growing up there.
Both positions are ambivalent.
The outsider may feel a sense of belonging because what he/she (
I dont know yet if this is a person or just a voice or roving eye
or a mere sub-title or what?) is relating to is an idea of the city
which he(for the moment lets keep it this way) has gleaned from
books, from songs, from movies, from critical enquiry and a
concerted effort to understand.
The insider on the other hand may feel alienated, because the
city and its hidden codes which I call culture, do not
accommodate her personal desires and needs. So her concerted
effort has to be to cleave her way through the culture and
re-configure it to suit her requirements.
At the same time, as an object of study, the city may confound the
researcher at many levels. The reality of present day Madurai may
contradict what he has come to expect of the mythic city from his
various sources.
While the young girl, discovering/forging her niche space within
its hidden recesses, or even in the familiar license with which she
demands acknowledgement/ acceptance (as one does with ones
parents) may unravel its innards with the ease of a biologist.
Another way of seeing the outside inside question is to state it
this way. The researcher supposes the city is outside himself.
The girl has to shed the city that conditions/holds her in
thrall, to emerge as a person.
Between these two not opposing but complementary - lines of
force, the city should unfurl with its own being/reality, on
screen. At least thats the intention.
Method
The fiction tends to write itself out. Peeps in over my shoulder
all the while that Im poring over stuff and then settles down as
image tracts in my mind when Im doing nothing. I like to think
of this process as reflection in the physics sense of the term.
That the mind throws back, with an equal degree of intensity,
what has assaulted it as incident rays of information input. Or
maybe refraction is a better term, for its really as if it passes
through another medium and emerges deflected. Thats why I like
the idea of the prism rather than the lens, for the mind.
For the rest, Im just reading for the moment. Just finished a
really well written book (in Tamil) called Society in the Sangam
Times. Was really pleasantly surprised because I had no notion
cultural anthropology was on in Tamil scholarship. But this
book by K.Subramanian, published by New Century Book House in 1982,
does a fantastic study of the Sangam times (about 500 B.C. to
roughly 300 A.D.) as a transition period between tribal society
and the first settlers. He traces remnants of the tribal way of
life in peoples continued belief - in magic and mana, animism
and fetishism, all barely getting overlaid by primitive
religion, in the presence (though transmuted) of totems and
taboos, in the process of the formation of primitive myths, right
under our noses so to speak, and in the practise of rituals
dances, ceremonies and sacrifices and the gradual shift from
matriarchy to patriarchy. He also studies social constructs like
ways of eating, the role and identity of the leader, and very
interestingly, the role of the artist and patronage.
Im not sure if its state of the art cultural anthropology but its
definitely strong on fundamentals
Besides other Tamil scholars, he quotes extensively from Morgan,
Engels, Frazer, D.D.Kosambi, E.O.James and Raymond Firth. His
source texts incidentally are the Sangam poems. Again, I am not
sure if creative writing should be taken as historical evidence
this will soon become crucial to my own work too but in the
quotations that he uses it is pretty easy to distinguish the
poetic conceit from the authentic detail. It is reassuring to
know that documentary and fiction are not seen as polarities within
this tradition but as environment and flower?
An important idea I gleaned from this book is that the origin of
the city as we know it, the urban consciousness, appears first in
the riverine, agricultural settlement, ( so much for the
rural-urban divide!) with the beginnings of a surplus economy. When
it becomes possible for one man who will become king to live by
others labour agricultural/trade, military and intellectual
labour. The first cities were high rise structures with divisive
fortification against enemies but also beyond the common man. And
the first urban art forms came to be performed for audiences the
king and his family, the militia and the ministry. Until then,
there was no audience. Everyone was an artiste, singing and
dancing together. This is an important distinction for me.
There is also in this deceptively simple book, another crucial
chapter which we at Sarai should find very relevant. This is a
chapter on networking spaces within Sangam society. Its tough
almost impossible to give the flavour of the original words.
Irukkai - sitting together is the tribal collective that
apparently took place everyday in the morning , when the whole
tribe met along with the tribal chief, who sat as one among them,
and planned the days forays for food. This came to be called Naal
Irukkai sitting together in the day. And invariably they drank.
Hence the added epithet Naal magizhirukkai. Magizh is a lovely
word with resonances of both joy and wine. And then they danced
a ritual dance in preparation for the hunt or to appease a god
or to pray for rain. And then in the evening they danced again, in
celebration or in thanksgiving. And all these were networking
activities in which the whole community participated.
The television today is for me precisely such a space. It is
completely incidental that there is a sophisticated technology
behind it and literally between the audience and performer. The
pitch of television is such that it creates a community. Its
aesthetics are functional, its content the stuff of life itself,
everyone is a hero on TV. And yes, we watch it daily.
Where it falls short, and significantly so, is in providing ritual
content. Which is where I come in, female shaman of the urban
jungle, about to blow away the cobwebs of dry habit (no one has
fears any more) from peoples minds. Devaratti - she who shook
the gods, I would have been called in Sangam times!
Do write in with any comments, suggestions, recommendations. Could
we retain the subject title of Madurai on all mails on this topic
for quick access. Im traveling over the next two weeks but will
read carefully on return.
Looking forward and best regards,
Soudhamini
--
_______________________________________________
Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10
More information about the reader-list
mailing list