[Reader-list] from beirut

Jeebesh Bagchi jeebesh at sarai.net
Wed Jul 26 22:44:08 IST 2006


	From: 	  anandpat at gmail.com
	Subject: 	[vikalp] from beirut
	Date: 	26 July 2006 7:45:39 PM GMT+05:30
	To: 	  vikalp at yahoogroups.com, vikalpmum at yahoogroups.com
	Reply-To: 	  vikalp at yahoogroups.com

Dear all

Sometimes the words of a single witness can reach through and touch  
you like no statistics ever can. These are a series of ongoing mails  
from Beirut. They were forwarded to me by Avi Mograbi an Israeli docu  
maker who was supposed to come to Delhi and Bombay last week but  
cancelled his trip to stay back and do his bit to bring sanity and  
humanity to the people of Israel and to all those who still do not  
grasp what is actually going on in the Middle East.



We've shown Avi's films in Vikalp. Avi's son is a refusenik who  
refused to fight in the Israeli army and was jailed for it.



I know this is primarily a film related space and what is below goes  
far beyond film, but please do read this. Anand



----- Original Message -----

From: Oz Shelach

To: Yael Lerer ; Sami S. Chetrit ; nawaf

Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 7:32 PM

Subject: fwd: letter from beirut



From: Rasha
Date: 10:37:28 GMT-04:00 14 July 2006

Dear All,

I am writing now from a cafe, in West Beirut's Hamra district. It is  
filled with people who are trying to escape the pull of 24 hour news  
reporting. Like me. The electricity has been cut off for a while now,  
and the city has been surviving on generators. The old system that  
was so familiar at the time of the war, where generators were allowed  
a lull to rest is back. The cafe is dark, hot and humid. Espresso  
machines and blenders are silenced. Conversations, rumors,  
frustrations waft through the room. I am better off here than at  
home, following the news, live, on the spot documentation of our  
plight in sound bites. The sound of Israeli warplanes overwhelms the  
air on occasion. They drop leaflets to conduct a "psychological" war.  
Yesterday, their sensitivity training urged them to advise  
inhabitants of the southern suburbs to flee because the night  
promised to be "hot". Today, the leaflets warn that they plan to bomb  
all other bridges and tunnels in Beirut. People are flocking to  
supermarkets to stock up on food.



This morning, I wrote in my emails to people inquiring about my well- 
being that I was safe, and that the targets seem to be strictly  
Hezbollah sites and their constituencies, now, I regret typing that.  
They will escalate. Until a few hours ago, they had only bombed the  
runways of the airport, as if to "limit" the damage. A few hours ago,  
four shells were dropped on the buildings of our brand new shining  
airport.

The night was harrowing. The southern suburbs and the airport were  
bombed, from air and sea. The apartment where I am living has a  
magnificient view of the bay of Beirut. I could see the Israeli  
warships firing at their leisure. It is astounding how comfortable  
they are in our skies, in our waters, they just travel around, and  
deliver their violence and congratulate themselves.

The cute French-speaking and English-speaking bourgeoisie has fled to  
the Christian mountains. A long-standing conviction that the Israelis  
will not target Lebanon's Christian "populated" mountains. Maybe this  
time they will be proven wrong? The Gulfies, Saudis, Kuwaities and  
other expatriates have all fled out of the country,
in Pullman buses via Damascus, before the road was bombed. They were  
supposed to be the economic lifeblood of this country. The contrast  
in their sense of panic as opposed to the defiance of the inhabitants  
of the southern suburbs was almost comical. This time, however, I  
have to admit, I am tired of defying whatever for whatever cause.  
There is no cause really. There are only sinister post-Kissingerian  
type negotiations. I can
almost hear his hateful voice rationalizing laconically as he does  
the destruction of a country, the deaths of families, people with  
dreams and ambitions for the Israelis to win something more, always  
more.

Although I am unable to see it, I am told left, right and center that  
there is a rhyme and reason, grand design, and strategy. The short- 
term military strategy seems to be to cripple transport and  
communications. And power stations. The southern region has now been  
reconfigured into small enclaves that cannot communicate between one  
another. Most have enough fuel, food and supplies to last them until  
tomorrow, but after that the
isolation of each enclave will lead to tragedy. Mayors and governors  
have been screaming for help on the TV.

This is all bringing back echoes of 1982, the Israeli siege of  
Beirut. My living nightmare, well one of my living nightmares. It was  
summer then as well. The Israeli army marched through the south and  
besieged Beirut. For 3 months, the US administration kept dispatching  
urges for the Israeli military to act with restraint. And the  
Israelis assured them they were acting appropriately. We had the PLO  
command in West Beirut then. I felt safe with the handsome fighters.  
How I miss them. Between Hezbollah and the Lebanese army I don't feel  
safe. We are exposed, defenseless, pathetic. And I am older, more  
aware of danger. I am 37 years old and actually scared. The sound of  
the warplanes scares me. I am not defiant, there is no more fight  
left in me. And there is no solidarity, no real cause.

I am furthermore pissed off because no one knows how hard the postwar  
reconstruction was to all of us. Hariri did not make miracles. People  
work hard and sacrifice a lot and things get done. No one knows  
except us how expensive, how arduous that reconstruction was. Every  
single bridge and tunnel and highway, the runways of that airport,  
all of these things were built from our sweat and brow, at 3 times  
the real cost of their construction because every member of  
government, because every character in the ruling Syrian junta,  
because the big players in the Hariri administration and beyond, were  
all thieves. We accepted the thievery and banditry just to get things  
done and get it over with. Everyone one of us had two jobs (I am not  
referring to the ruling elite, obviously), paid backbreaking taxes  
and wages to feed the "social covenant". We fought and fought that  
neoliberal onslaught, the arrogance of economic consultants and the  
greed of creditors just to have a nice country that functioned at a  
minimum, where things got done, that stood on its feet, more or less.  
A thriving Arab civil society. Public schools were sacrificed for  
roads to service neglected rural areas and a couple Syrian officers  
to get richer, and we accepted, that road was desperately needed, and  
there was the
"precarious national consensus" to protect. Social safety nets were  
given up, healthcare for all, unions were broken and coopted, public  
spaces taken over, and we bowed our heads and agreed. Palestinian  
refugees were pushed deeper and deeper into forgetting, hidden from  
sight and consciousness, "for the preservation of their identity" we  
were told, and we accepted. In exchange we had a secular country  
where the Hezbollah
and the Lebanese Forces could co-exist and fight their fights in  
parliament not with bullets. We bit hard on our tongues and stiffened  
our upper lip, we protested and were defeated, we took the streets,  
defied army-imposed curfews, time after time, to protect that modicum  
of civil rights, that modicum of a semblance of democracy, and it
takes one air raid for all our sacrifices and tolls to be blown to  
smithereens. It's not about the airport, it's what we built during  
that postwar.

As per the usual of Lebanon, it's not only about Lebanon, the country  
haparadigmatically been the terrain for regional conflicts to lash  
out violently.. Off course speculations abound. There is rhetoric,  
and a lot of it, but there are also Theories.

1) Theory Number One.
This is about Syria, Hamas and Hezbollah negotiating an upper hand in  
the negotiations with Israel. Hezbollah have indicated from the  
moment they captured the Israeli soldiers that they were willing to  
negotiate in conjunction with Hamas for the release of all Arab  
prisoners in Israeli jails. Iran is merely providing a back support  
for Syria + Hamas.

2) Theory Number Two.
This is not about solidarity with Gaza or strengthening the hand of  
the Palestinians in negotiating the release of the prisoners in  
Israeli jails. This is about Iran's nuclear bomb and negotiations  
with the Europeans/US. The Iranian negotiator left Brussels after the  
end of negotiations and instead of returning to Tehran, he landed in  
Damascus. Two days later, Hezbollah kidnapped the Israeli soldiers.  
The G8 Meeting is on Saturday, Iran is
supposed to have some sort of an answer for the G8 by then. In the  
meantime, they are showing to the world that they have a wide sphere  
of control in the region: Afghanistan, Iraq and Lebanon. In Lebanon  
they pose a real threat to Israel. The "new" longer-reaching missiles  
that Hezbollah fired on Haifa are the message. The kings of Jordan  
and Saudi Arabia issued statements holding Hezbollah solely  
responsible for bringing on this
escalation, and that is understood as a message to Iran. Iran on the  
other hand promised to pay for the reconstruction of destroyed homes  
and infrastructures in the south. And threatened Israel with "hell"  
if they hit Syria.

3) Theory Number Three.
This is about Lebanon, Hezbollah and 1559 (the UN resolution  
demanding the disarmement of Hezbollah and deployment of the Lebanese  
army in the southern territory). It stipulates that this is no more  
than a secret conspiracy between Syria, Iran and the US to close the  
Hezbollah file for good, and resolve the pending Lebanese crisis  
since the assassination of Hariri. Evidence for this conspiracy is  
Israel leaving Syria so far unharmed. Holders of this theory claim  
that Israel will deliver a harsh blow to Hezbollah and cripple the  
Lebanese economy to the brink of creating an internal political  
crisis. The resolution would then result in Hezbollah giving up arms,  
and a buffer zone between Israel and Lebanon under the control of the  
Lebanese army in Lebanon and the Israeli army in the north of  
Galilee. More evidence for this Theory are the Saudi Arabia and  
Jordan statements condemning Hezbollah and holding them responsible  
for all the
horrors inflicted on the Lebanese people.

There are more theories... There is also the Israeli government  
reaching an impasse and feeling a little worried out by Hezbollah and  
Hamas, and the Israeli military taking the upper hand with Olmert.

The land of conspiracies... Fun? I can't make heads or tails. But I  
am tired of spending days and nights waiting not to die from a shell,  
on target or astray. Watching poor people bludgeoned, homeless and  
preparing to mourn. I am so weary...

Rasha.



(DAY 2 of siege)

from Rasha in Beirut



Dear All,

It is now night time in Beirut. The day was heavy, busy with shelling  
from the air and sea, but so far the night has been quiet in Beirut.  
We are advised to be bracing ourselves for a bad night, although most  
analysis is more reading tea leaves at this stage.
I received a wide array of comments regarding my email yesterday. The  
comments stayed with me all day. I visited friends this morning at  
their house, people now gather in homes, most cafes In "West Beirut"  
are closed, streets are quiet. In times like these, the city huddles  
on its neighborhoods, main thoroughfares are avoided, side roads and  
back streets are trekked. Gatherings shift to the house of the member  
of the group whose neighborhood has electricity, whose elevator  
works, and who has elusive enough familial obligations to house an  
antsy crowd eager for social exchange.
Amongst that group, I was the only one who seemed to have experienced  
the weariness, to be genuinely frustrated with having to face another  
round of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Everyone seemd resigned to endure  
this dark and sinister moment. Everyone was busying themselves with  
analysis, speculation. Mind games, fictions, chimeras. I regretted  
expressing my weariness with the fight, with having to summon the  
energy to face Israel and defy the destruction of Lebanon. I felt I  
betrayed a principle, a value, disrespected people's pain and  
suffering. I know a great great number of people in Lebanon share my  
sentiments, and the political debates on TV seem to return to the  
question tirelessly. But still, I felt "smaller" than the historical  
moment demanded.
I wanted to write this, I needed to come clean to you all. I need to  
let you know that if you were intrigued/discomforted by the pettiness  
of my spirit. The cause of this is partly my refusal to acknowledge  
the gravity of the moment. I don't feel I am strong or courageous  
enough to face it, to take it all in.

Last night something quite fantastical happened. By this morning, the  
mood in the country and city was palpably changed. Sometimes it is  
hard for me to believe that the leadership of Hezbollah are not  
acquainted with "The Society of the Spectacle".
Last night was a turning point in the confrontation between Hezbollah  
and the Israeli army. I ought to have drafted a note right after that  
moment, but I could not find the mental energy to do it. I was so  
scared and anxious that I became sucked into the pull of minute by  
minute news reporting and finally succumbed to exhaustion.
You probably all heard about the Israeli warship that was drowned. I  
am convinced that all of you not privvy to Arab media missed the  
spectacular staging of the drowning of that warship.
The "showcase" began with Israeli shells targetting Hassan  
Nasrallah's home in the southern suburbs. As soon as the shells  
exploded, the media reported them and waited to confirm that he and  
his family had survived. About half an hour later, the newscaster  
announced that Hassan Nasrallah planned to adress the nation and the  
Arab world by phone.
I never thought he was charismatic. A huge majority of people do.  
He's very young to hold the position of leadership that he does. He's  
a straight talker, not particularly eloquent, but speaks in an idiom  
that appeals to his immediate constituency in Lebanon  but is also  
compelling to a constituency in the Arab world that harbors  
disillusionment, despondency and powerlessness with the failed  
promises of Arab nationalism to defeat Israel and restore dignity. He  
is not corrupt, he lives simply, and displays a bent on spartan  
ascetism. Although he's neither charismatic nor captivating, he has  
cultivated an aura of sorts, particularly since his son was martyred  
at age 18 in a commando operation in south Lebanon when it was  
occupied by the Israeli military. He survived the Israeli attempt on  
his life last night, and addressed the nation by phone, thirty  
minutes later. His speech was pragmatic, again spoken in his habitual  
simple (almost simplistic) idiom from within the Hezbollah rhetoric,  
obviosuly. The speech was intended to deliver a number of specific  
messages, answer back to pronouncements by regional leaders and  
clarify Hezbollah's strategy in the face of the unexpectedly barbaric  
Israeli attack.
He began by declaring an open war to Israel's assault. He summoned  
the Lebanese people to unite in this moment of confrontation,  
transcend petty divisions and rise to the occasion. He promised to  
deliver victory, based on the long record of victories by Hezbollah.  
Most powerful and compelling was his response to the Saudi, Jordanian  
and Egyptian statements issued earlier that day, blaming Hezbollah  
for bringing the tragedy on Lebanon. The Saudi statement had referred  
to Hezbollah's actions as "adventurous", the Jordanian as  
"irresponsible" and the Egyptian as something in both these veins.  
All three had invoked the pressing need to act reasonably.  
Nasrallah's response basically said that he is the leader of the only  
Arab and Muslim political movement to have defeated Israel militarily  
and forced it to withdraw, the only Arab leader to have been able to  
shell Israel and pose a serious military threat from without its  
borders. If his actions were "adventurous" he argued, they were  
certainly reasonable, but they did not comply to the reason that  
guides Arab leaders and Arab regimes, rather the reason that animates  
the common folk on the streets, the reason that defies defeat, the  
reason that brings victories, saves dignity and does not fear the  
enemy no matter how powerful his arsenal and allies. He called onto  
the Arab and Muslim world to stand in solidarity with the Lebanese as  
they faced, once more, the savagery of the Zionist machine.
His third message was to the "Zionist enemy". He reiterated that  
Hezbollah did not fear an open war. That they have long been prepared  
for this confrontation. Interestingly, he claimed that they possessed  
missiles that could reach Haifa, and "far beyond Haifa, beyond,  
beyond Haifa", thereby admitting that it was Hezbollah that fired the  
missile fired to Haifa (until then they denied having fired them). It  
is not clear what he meant by "far beyond Haifa". Did he mean Tel  
Aviv? It is not THAT far from Haifa. Did he mean Israeli interests  
and missions abroad? It was not clear. More terrains for speculators.
His conclusion was all about the showcase... In his message to the  
Zionist entity, he reminded his audience that he had promised to  
deliver many "suprises". And now the time has come for the first of  
the many surprises they have in store for the Zionist enemy, namely  
the warship that had bombed the southern suburb the night before and  
was casually sailing in the bay of Beirut was now in flames and its  
personel was drowning. "Look at it!", he said, this is one of the  
many surprises we have saved for the Zionist army... And he fell silent.
There is no film footage of the warship being hit because all the  
cameras had their lenses directed inland, focused on scouting for  
shells, destruction, victims and tragedy writ large. By the time he  
had spoken his words, it was too late to catch sight of the warship  
being hit, all that cameras captured was a huge ball of fire in the  
open sea, but not much else was clear. Rescue flares flew into the  
sky from around the ship. Ultimately, it would turn out that all  
except for 4 from the crew would be rescued/recovered.
The Israeli media began by denying the report, then confirming the  
warship had been hit, then claiming there were no losses, then  
admitting four sailors were missing, then claiming the ship was towed  
to the Haifa port, then admitting it had sunk in the sea where it was  
hit. This morning one of the three bodies was uncovered by Hezbollah.
The news of the downed warship spread fear in our hearts. We were  
sure the retaliation would be numbing in violence. Then Hezbollah  
fired rockets on some settlements in the Galilee and we were all  
bracing ourselves for a night of hell. Nothing happened in Beirut.  
The south was shelled, the north was shelled the Beqaa was shelled.  
Surgical assaults on roads, bridges and the communication network.  
Slowly but surely, in cold blood the country was being dismembered,  
ligament after ligament, inland, on the coast, and in the mountains.
In Beirut, the night was quiet. I could not understand how one downed  
Israeli warship could throw disarray into a military as powerful as  
the Israeli military.

Nasrallah's calls for solidarity resonnated loudly the next day.  
Immediately after the spectacular showcase, Hezbollah television was  
showered with phone calls from Saudi Arabia expressing their support.  
There were protests supporting him and his mission in almost every  
Arab city. They contrasted sharply with the reactions from Arab  
officialdom. He had won his first round against Israel and against  
the slothful, debilitated and stunted Arab leaderships



(Day 3 of the Siege)
Today was a bad day. The shelling started from the morning  
countrywide and has not let until now. It was particularly brutal in  
the south. Marwaheen, a village in the south that had been under  
siege was showered with leafets from airplanes urging its inhabitants  
to flee because it would be bombed to the ground two hours later. As  
people gathered up stuff and began to flee, a few were not spared  
from the shelling, 12 children perished, burned alive on the road  
walking out of the village. A group amongst the fleeing villagers  
panicked and saught refuge at a UNIFIL (UN peacekeeping force) base  
on their road out of the village run by French army volunteers, but  
they were refused shelter and turned back. I don't know how  
unprecedented this is but it is certainly shocking.
Nearly all Lebanese ports were shelled today, Beirut, Tripoli, Sidon,  
Tyre, Amshit and Jounieh. Christian areas are not being spared. The  
alternative road to Syria (via Tripoli and Homs) was shelled. Bridges  
in the north of the country and the south of the country were shelled  
and rendered unusable.

Tonight the shelling is again focused on the southern suburbs, Haret  
Hreyk and Bir el-Abed. The first neighborhood is where the  
headquarters of Hezbollah are located. They have been targetted  
several times and there is extensive damage. The leadership has not  
been harmed. A great number of the inhabitants have been evacuated,  
but the afternoon shelling targetted residential areas. I am up,  
anxious, writing. As if it served a purpose of sorts.

Foreign diplomatic missions are making plans to evacuate their  
nationals. They had planned to evacuate people by sea, but after  
today's shelling of the ports, they may have to rethink their  
strategy. Should I evacuate? Does one turn their back on a "historic"  
station in the Arab-Israeli conflict? If there is no cause that  
animates me, how do I endure this? (I could not give two rats' ass  
about the Iranian nuclear bomb or Hezbollah's negotiating power). I  
was shamed this morning for having these thoughts... And now, at 1:30  
am, as the Israeli airplanes fill up my sky, I am writing them again.

There was much diplomatic activity today, almost all of it secured  
moral high ground for Israel to proceed with "scorched earth" policy,  
re-occupy the south to secure its own borders, and disarm Hezbollah  
after a fatal blow. The meeting at the UN security council yesterday  
provided Israel with a green light to pretty much do whatever it  
wished in this country. (My favorite was Bolton, who was focused on  
the necessity to "take down" Khaled Masha'al -Hamas representative-  
in Damascus.)
Then there was an emergency Arab League meeting that pretty much  
determined that the peace plan of the Quartet was defunct and the  
region was at the brink of an explosion and that they will call for a  
UN security council meeting at once. If international law was not  
respected, then the Arab League would resort to other means (and  
"arms" was not eliminated as an option). Did the Arabs declare war?  
We don't know, did they intimate war? It would be the most prudish,  
skiddish, repressed intimation ever in the history of wars.

For now it seems that the battle will take about two to three weeks  
to wane.. There are stated aims and they are within the paradigm of  
1559, namely that Hezbollah should give up its arms, and the southern  
Lebanese border with Israel be secured by the Lebanese army.  
Hezbollah are not suicidal, unlike the Bin Ladens of the world and  
other radicals, they want to negotiate a bigger share of the pie in  
Lebanon. They are aware that in the final count, they will have to  
give up something, so until a cease-fire seems like an amenable  
solution to them, they need to register as many victories as  
possible. The rockets that can reach Haifa is one such victory,  
because Haifa is an important petro-chemical base in Israel. The  
Israeli Patriot missiles planted on Haifa that seem not to work are  
also another small victory for Hezbollah. The drowned warship is  
another victory.
Israel's strategy is not only to dismember this country and cripple  
communication, but also to challenge internal support for Hezbollah.  
People like me for example, complaining about how my life is a small  
hell and I can't take it anymore, yesterday and maybe a little bit  
today, well I was an agent of Israel. I was executing the Israeli  
strategy to break the spirit of the valiant Arabs. In fact the  
Israeli ambassador to the UN quoted two Lebanese MPs citing how  
little support for Hezbollah there is in Lebanon. This is the  
rhetoric. But in point of fact it is true, that Israel has not spared  
an area at this stage, whether Hezbollah stronghold or not and they  
want to make us pay for housing Hezbollah in our parliament. Maybe  
they prefer an Iraqi scenario?

Forgive me if I am losing my mind. I need to end this long diary  
entry. I would like to end it by congratulating the president of  
Iran, to whom a nuclear bomb (like the president of Pakistan) is by  
far more important than his people walking barefoot, illiterate and  
hungry. But the kind and generous president of Iran "assured" the  
world that if Israel hit Syria, Iran would show them hell. Never mind  
Lebanon burning!

Until Day 4 of the Siege.
Love, R.





(DAY 4 of siege)

another account from Rasha in Beirut



Dear All,

Things seem to heating up. Missiles hit Haifa and the shelling on the  
south and southern suburbs is unrelenting.

Scorched Earth Policy
Ehud Olmert promised scorched earth in South Lebanon after missiles  
hit Haifa. Warnings have been sent to inhabitants of the south to  
evacuate their villages, because the Israeli response to Hezbollah  
will be "scorched Earth".. As major roads are destroyed and the south  
has been remapped into enclaves, it is not clear how these people are  
supposed to evacuate. And where to. It seems the "sensitivity  
training" that the IDF went through for evacuating the settlers from  
Gaza is really paying off, even on the "civilians" because Ehud  
Olmert offered the hapless inhabitants of the south shelter in  
Israel. Now that's leadership! Will they be sprayed by DDT as did the  
jewish populations shuttled from Iraq, Morocco and Egypt in the 1950s  
and 1960s? Will there be Maabarot (transit camps) ready for them?
They want the 20 kilometers buffer zone and they will burn, destroy  
and maime to get it. Maybe they should build another wall?

Video-Clip
Al-Manar TV has a video-clip of possible, potential hits to Haifa.  
Impressive. A missile is loaded, the camera travels over arial views  
of occupied Palestine and stops at Haifa. The port. Zoom on the petro- 
chemical reservoirs.. Cut to a hand pressing on a green button. The  
images are accompanied with text in Arabic and in Hebrew. They are  
conducting their war in images and video-clips.

Proud to be an Arab
I am still in awe with the response from Arab regimes, how utterly  
proud I am to be an Arab. From Abou Mazen, to the several moral and  
physical dwarf kings and queens (the Abdullahs and whatevers) to the  
un-democratically elected representatives, "chapeau"...
I think of all the streets, those who are watching Gaza, Iraq, and  
now us. Do we not deserve their outrage? Do we not deserve mass  
mobilizations? Should not Moubarak, and his band of bandits and  
thieves deserve to be put to shame for their endorsement of the  
Israeli response.
How does it feel, my beloved friends, Arabs and non-Arabs to watch  
Beirut go up in flames?
Meanwhile wall-to-wall coverage is only from al-Jazeera, al-Arabiya  
and the Lebanese TV stations. The "war" is only a news item on Abou  
Dhabi, MBC, and the other Arab stations...

The Lebanese predicament
So Hezbollah dragged us without asking our opinion into this hell. We  
are in this hell, caught in this cross-fire together. We need to  
survive and save as many lives as possible. The Israelis are now  
betting on the implosion of Lebanon. It will not happen. There is  
UNANIMITY that Israel's response is entirely, entirey, UNJUSTIFIED.  
We will show the Arab leadership that it is possible to have internal  
dissent and national unity, pluralism, divergence of opinion and face  
this new sinister chapter of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Dictatorships produce mute sheep and sheepherders and radical  
ideologies.

Rasha.





From: Rasha

To: undisclosed-recipients:

Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 3:01 PM

Subject: Day 5 of the Siege- part 1 (it's gonna be a long one...)



Dear All,

A quiet night in Beirut, more or less, compared to what the  
inhabitants of Tyre and the south and the Beqaa and Tripoli  
experienced. They were shelled from the air and sea with little  
respite. Tyre is in tragically dire situation. 30,000 displaced, the  
mayor was on TV screaming for help, his voice choking with despair.  
They are out of supplies, they have more wounded than they can handle  
and the city's reserves in fuel and other basic amenities are pretty  
much depleted.
(The IDF wants to "clear" three provinces in the South: Tyre,  
Marja'uyun and Bin Jbeil, in preparation for the "20 km buffer zone")
The port of Tripoli was bombed, the port of Beirut was bombed. The  
range of targets has expanded to new zones of hurt: civilians,  
civilians, civilians, and reservoirs of fuel (Jiyyeh, power station  
feeding the south, and the airport again), storage facilities of  
vegetables and fruits in Taanayel (Beqaa) and in the south, and  
Lebanese army barracks. The roster of martyrs of this war now  
includes poor soldiers, reservists who were stationed in their posts,  
watching idly the country go up in flames.
The intention? Probably to cripple the population even further, to  
make survival harder and harder and to corner the Lebanese army.
The promise of "scorched earth" did not really happen yesterday, I  
mean the inhabitants of the south were served a good dose of Israeli  
virility, but not to the level of "shock and awe". Maybe it will come  
in small calculated doses (The IDF are a "calculating" military, not  
like us, rogues, we don't calculate). Who knows? Who the fuck knows?  
What makes sense anymore...

Dementia is slowly creeping in... Slowly, surreptitiously. At the  
rate of news flashes. This is how we live now, from "breaking news"  
to "breaking news". A sampling: I have been in the cafe for one hour  
now. (The cafe is an escape from home, but in itself another island  
of insanity... will get to that later at some point).
OK, I have been in the cafe for one hour now. This is what I have  
heard so far:
      1) A text message traveled to my friend's cell phone: A  
breaking news item from Israeli military command. If Hezbollah does  
not stop shelling Galilee and northern towns, Israel will hit the  
entire electricity network of Lebanon.
      2) Hezbollah shells Haifa, Safad, and colonies in south Golan.
      3) A text message traveled to my other friend's cell phone,  
from an expat who left to Damascus and is catching a flight back to  
London. "All flights out of Damascus are cancelled. Do you know  
anything?"
      4) Israeli shell fell near the house of the bartender, his  
family is stranded in the middle of rubbble in Hadath. He leaps out  
of the cafe and frantically calls to secure passage for them to the  
mountains.
      5) Hezbollah down an F-16 Israeli plane into Kfarshima (near  
Hadath). Slight jubilation in a cafe that thrives on denial.
Does the world make sense to anyone? It's not supposed to, I know,  
but these "surgical" military tactics are supposed to make sense to  
at least 15 people. And out of these 15 people, at least 14  
disseminate the news, and since the world is about 6 degrees of  
separation removed, at some point, somebody has to know something...

I started writing these diary notes to friends outside Lebanon to  
remain sane and give them my news. I was candid and transparent with  
all my emotions.. The ones I had and the ones I did not have. They  
were more intended to fight dementia at home, in my home and in my  
mind, to bridge the isolation in this siege, than to fight the media  
black-out, racism, prejudice and break the seal of silence. Friends  
began to circulate them (with my approval). By the third diary note,  
I was getting replies, applause and rebuke from people I did not know  
who had read them. It's great to converse with the world at large,  
but I realize now that candor and transparency come with a price.. A  
price I am more than happy to pay. However, these diary notes are  
becoming something else, and I realize now that I am no longer  
writing to the intimate society of people I love and cherish, but to  
an opaque blogosphere of people who want "alternative" news. I am  
more than ever conscious of a sense of responsibility in drafting  
them, they have a public life, an echo that I was not aware of that I  
experience now as some sort of a burden. I have been tortured about  
the implications of that public echo. Should I remain candid,  
critical, spiteful, cowardly, or should I transform into an activist  
and write in a wholly different idiom? There is off course a happy  
medium between both positions, but I don't have the mental  
wherewithalls to find it now. And I don't want to sacrifice candor,  
transparency and skepticism at the risk of having my notes distorted  
to serve some ill-intentioned purpose, or in the vocabulary of  
official rhetoric, "give aid and comfort to the enemy". The enemy  
does well without the aid of my rantings (they have a nuclear bomb, a  
hero soccer player form Ghana, the gift of democracy, fantabulous  
drag queens, and a right wing freak whose first name is BiBi). Notes  
from a hapless stranded thirty-something caged in Ras Beirut (ie the  
privileged of the privileged), I believe, will not really make a  
difference.
I am reminded of the many, many, many e-diaries that Palestinians  
send when the Israelis want to secure peace and give them a virile  
dose of justice with sieges, shelling, checkpoints, sniping, maiming,  
beating, and all that Israel has developped in the vein of practices  
to strengthen its democracy and territory and off course contribute  
to the blossoming of the peace process. Well my rantings are far from  
the emails of my Palestinian brethren. They are charged with  
ambivalence and anti-heroics. In Palestine things are less complex,  
less dirty, more starkly contrasted and clear. What Israel is now  
administering to Lebanon is a small dose of what it delivers to  
Palestinians. Intense, condensed, but a small dose. However the  
complications of Lebanon's internal politics and the very, very  
complicated imbrications of Lebanon with regional politics renders  
enduring, witnessing, documenting this war more confusing. So bear  
with me. It's lonely being an anti-hero.
My Palestinian friends are protesting that the Israeli campaign in  
Gaza has been eclipsed from the world's attention and concern. Beirut  
is now attracting attention. Don't look away from Gaza. The same  
canons are firing. The same children are orphaned, the same people  
are being displaced, shoved outside history and the attributes of  
humanity, rendered to integers in the logs of NGOs for donations of  
bags of flour and sugar. The same.

By Day 5 of the Siege, a new routine has set in. "Breaking news"  
becomes the clock that marks the passage of time. You find yourself  
engaging in the strangest of activities: you catch a piece of  
breaking news, you leap to another room to annoounce it to family  
although they heard it too, and then you txt-message it to others. At  
some point in the line-up, you become yourself the messenger of  
"breaking news". Along the way you collect other pieces of "breaking  
news" which you deliver back. Between two sets of breaking news, you  
gather up facts and try to add them up to fit a scenario. Then you  
recall previously mapped scenarios. Then you realize none works. Then  
you exhale. And zap. Until the next piece of breaking news comes. It  
just gets uglier. You fear night-time. For some reason, you believe  
the shelling will get worse at night. When vision is impaired, when  
darkness envelops everything. But it's not true. Shelling is as  
intense during the day as it is during the night.

There has been "intense" diplomatic activity between yesterday and  
today. UN envoys, ambassadors, EU envoys, all kinds of men and women  
coming and going carrying messages to the Lebanese government from  
the "international community" and the "Israeli counterpart".  
Officially they have led to nothing. But we are told, officially on  
the news, that the "secret" channels have started working, and these  
are the ones that work. The secret channels were launched when the  
Lebanese Prime Minister met with the US ambassador and the Lebanese  
head of parliament in a closed door meeting at the head of  
parliament's home. There is supposed to be some sort of press  
conference after that. And Jacques Chirac (Lebanon holds a special  
place in his heart) is sending handsome Dominique de Villepin to  
Lebanon this afternoon. He is scheduled to arrive at 5:00 pm. He's  
the genius who created the CPE, the genius who finally "listened" to  
the dark-skinned and maladjusted children of France during the last  
round of riots. I guess we should be glad he's not sending Sarkoczy?  
Or is the ugly Pole going to Israel? In the final count, we are a  
"banlieue" of France, the bad boys are at it again, burning cars and  
breaking the "fragile" status quo in the region. When de Villepin is  
here, we could have a lull in the shelling. Maybe. Maybe that's when  
they'll evacuate the "foreign nationals".
The foreign nationals are a new issue now. With so many expats  
visiting for the summer, and with so many Lebanese holding dual  
nationality, it's been tough for the G8 to plan their evacuations.  
Two hundred thousand Canadians (8 of whom perished yesterday in the  
south)! Fifty thousand Frenchmen... What to do with all these bi- 
nationals? Create categories. Category A are the real, genuine, white- 
skinned, tax-paying valuable natives, Category B are the recently  
integrated, recently assimilated, brown-skinned, tax-paying not so  
valuable natives.
The best evacuation plan is the American. They are directing their  
"nationals" to a website (ha! with electricty power cuts it's kinda  
funny) where they promise an airlift from the airport (although the  
air strips have been destroyed) to Cyprus. But the seriously unfunny  
part is that there is an evacuation fee. And for those with no money,  
the US government generously offers a loan. Isn't that brilliant?  
Loans and fees are processed in Cyprus.

There are ultra-secret channeling mediated by the Germans too. The  
Germans negotiated the last round of prisoner exchange between  
Hezbollah and Israel.. "The Germans know their way with Hezbollah"  
noted a newscaster. Isn't it funny how these conflicts find their  
interlocutors and negotiators.

I am obsessively thinking about these negotiators and diplomats. How  
they go through their day. How they initiate conversations, how they  
end them. Top on my list is Amr Moussa, Egypt's star diplomat and  
gift to the Arab League. His handling of the Lebanese crisis is  
stellar, and comes after his handling of the assault on Gaza and  
perhaps his crowning achievement is his handling of Darfur. How do  
these people receive dispatches that hundreds of people are dead and  
decide not to act? I am fascinated by how they structure their  
consciousness. Not conscience, consciousness. I guess they become  
numb. I guess they believe that the sweep of history spares them.  
They probably see the world in a different way, that some people are  
condemned to be in Gaza or in Tyre and they are supposed to live  
meaningless lives and die anonymous deaths. They don't. They believe  
they fashion history writ large. They go through their day, enjoying  
sleep and meals. Air-conditioned cars, private jets, tailored suits,  
who's coming to dinner, where to spend summer vacation. They are  
never to be held accountable for whatever they say or do.
How did Amr Moussa go through the conversation with the Saudi envoy,  
for example? The tall Saudi minister of foreign affairs was firm,  
emboldened with an unusual surge of virility, he must have said to  
him, "Screw the Lebanese, the Hezbollah have to pay. We support the  
Lebanese government but we should publically condemn Hezbollah and  
demand a cease-fire. And Amr Moussa said what? "I agree with you."  
And felt good about agreeing with the Saudis. Did his stomach not  
writhe with a hint of an ulcer when he hung up? Did he not press on  
and say, "But the Arab League should take a vanguard role in ending  
this crisis as soon as possible and impose a cease-fire?" Off course  
his president, Hosni Moubarak had his own pep talk with the press.  
And it was inspiring. I think it's easier being Hosni Mobarak because  
he's senile. Senility is his understanding of freedom. He's a few  
inches away from absolute freedom. Egypt is waiting with abated  
breath when he comes out and dsiplays the joys of having absolutely  
not a single hint of remembrance or cognitive perception of the world  
around him.
Meanwhile Lebanon was being shelled to rubble. And Amr Moussa must  
have felt "pressured" to offer something to the "Arab street" (aaah  
that elusive demon). The foreign ministers agreed in unanimity that  
the best course of action would be to raise the question at the UN  
security council meeting in September. To the embarassingly weepy  
mother of the decapitated child, to the embarassingly nagging child  
of the charred mother, to the "steadfastly valiant" Palestinians in  
Gaza and the "hapless" Lebanese in the south, they figured they owed  
them something, a statement to relieve them from their grief. And the  
groundbreaking insight said that "the Arab league officially deemed  
the "peace process to be dead." No one, no one expected such  
enlightening wisdom from the council of foreign ministers. I am still  
enraptured in its profundity.

Breaking News: It's not clear Hezbollah downed a plane. The al-Manar  
TV is now describing it as a "foreign body". Will the Israelis add it  
to their list of casualties?

Day 5 of the Siege is promising to be more enthralling. More mad  
ramblings tonight...

Love to all, Rasha.





To: undisclosed-recipients:

Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:08 AM

Subject: Day 6 of the Siege



(Dear All,
The generator shut down before I could end this entry. It's noon the  
next day now...)

Dear All,

I am drafting this entry in this unusual diary at 11:30 pm, I have  
about half an hour before the generator shuts down. Most of Beirut is  
in the dark. I dare not imagine what the country is like. Today was a  
relatively calm day, but like most calm days that come immediately  
after tumultuous days, it was a sinister day of taking stock of  
damage, pulling bodies from under destroyed buildings, shuttling  
injured to hospitals that have the capacity to tend to their wounds  
more adequately.
The relative calm allowed journalists to visit the sites of shelling  
and violence. The images from Tyre, and villages in the south are  
shocking. Images from Haret Hreyk (the neighborhood in the southern  
suburb that received the most "focused" shelling) are also astounding.
The number of deaths is yet uncertain, it increases by the hour as  
bodies are pulled from the landscape of destruction. In the southern  
suburbs, some people may be trapped in underground shelters under the  
vestiges of their homes and apartment buildings. And yes, there is a  
problem of space in morgues in the south and the Beqaa, because none  
of the towns and villages are equipped to handle these numbers of  
deaths.
The IDF has destroyed almost entirely the village of 'Aytaroun. Some  
of the surviving wounded are Canadian citizens. Like the 8 Canadians  
who died in the building in Tyre (a building that housed the red  
cross and civil rescue), the Canadian government has had very little  
regard for them.

Evacuations, Privilege, Solidarity
Today was a particularly strange day for me because I was granted an  
opportunity to leave tomorrow morning. I hold a Canadian passport, I  
was born in Toronto when my parents were students there. I left at  
age two. I have never gone back, for lack of opportunity and  
occasion, no other reason. I have the choice to sign up for the  
evacuation, but the European and North American governments have been  
so despicable, so racist that I don't want to subject myself to a  
discrimination of that sort. The Swedes, the Danes and the Germans  
have evacuated their patriots with blond hair and blue eyes. The  
immigrants that were given shelter to their countries "out of the  
kindness" of their governments have been systematically left behind;  
and the guest workers who stayed to enliven their economies and their  
babies who adjust the dynamism of their demographies, were left  
behind to fend for shelter under the shells. But I digress. The point  
I set out to make is that I refuse to be evacuated as a second tier  
denizen.
I had the opportunity to leave tomorrow by car to Syria, then to  
Jordan and from there by plane to wherever I am supposed to be right  
now. For days I have been itching to leave because I want to pursue  
my professional commitments, meet deadlines and continue with my  
life. For days I have been battling ambivalence towards this war,  
estranged from the passions it has roused around me and from  
engagement in a cause. And yet when the phone call came informing me  
that I had to be ready at 7:00 am the next morning, I asked for a  
pause to think. I was torn. The landscape of the human and physical  
ravages of Israel's genial strategy at implementing UN Resolution  
1559, the depth of destruction, the toll of nearly 250 deaths, more  
than 800 injured and 400,000 displaced, had bound me to a sense of  
duty. It was not even patriotism, it was actually the will to defy  
Israel. They cannot do this and drive me away. They will not drive me  
away.
This is one of the most recurring mistakes that the IDF makes, this  
is how we see things: THEY have destroyed this country, THEY are  
taking an opportunity to turn it to rubble and to usher us into  
oblivion, if there is ambivalence vis-a-vis the wisdom of Hezbollah's  
capture of the two soldiers, there is unambiguous, unanimous  
solidarity to stand in the face of Israel's barbaric arrogance. Some  
people see more in this war, some people see a moment of where the  
logic/values of the policies of the Moubaraks, the Abdullahs of the  
Arab world, i.e. the defeatist, pragmatic corrupt sell-outs will be  
humiliated as well. And I am sure, other people see other things as  
well.

The roads to Damascus are not safe. Its many different ways are  
shelled everyday. Drivers know what "calculated" risks to take, I am  
assured, but one never knows. Everyday the way out becomes more  
difficult. I decided to stay, I don't know when I will have another  
opportunity to leave.
The first contingent of Britons was evacuated early this evening.  
There are two ships, but the evacuation will take place over 3 days.  
Same for the French and Americans, their evacuations will last for 2  
days. While the evacuations are taking place, there was relative  
quiet. A welcome lull. There was activity in the street, even on the  
Corniche along the seaside. Refugees from the south, displaced from  
their homes and provided shelter in public schools strolled in Hamra,  
looking for a breath of fresh air. A break from the confinement in  
schools and other makeshift shelters.
Imagine the horror, the sad, sad horror: we are on borrowed time and  
the only reason we are not under threat, under any serious threat is  
because the passport holders of some of the G8 countries are  
evacuating safely to safer harbors. With this relative calm, the  
sense of impending doom becomes almost palpable, time, space, light  
and movement are subsumed in an eerie stillness. It feels vaporous  
and fills the air. As it wafts from room to room, from apartment to  
apartment, as it turns a corner and moves to another neighborhood,  
every gesture, every act is a little delayed, slowed, surreptitiously  
lethargic, every thought lingers too long in the unfinished or  
inchoate state. This eerie stillness numbs the passage of time and  
the cognitive perception of things material. Objects seem both  
familiar and unfamiliar. They are familiar in that they were there  
the day before and seem not to have moved from their place. They are  
unfamiliar because they seem to belong to another time, another life.  
There was another life, I had another life that seems distant and  
foreign now. The morning is different, noon is different, sunset is  
different. Another Beirut has emerged. War time Beirut. War time  
Lebanon. War time mornings, war time noons. Siege time Beirut, siege  
time morning, siege time sunsets. Everyone else in the world is going  
about their day as they had planned it or as it was planned for them.  
The shakers and movers of this world, the fledgling middle classes of  
the developping world, the 11 million children workers in India, the  
good-doers and the evil-doers. We are in a different geography of  
time, of agency, we are besieged, captive, hostage. No chance of  
Stockholm syndrome this time. Our every move is monitored: every  
moving vehicle delivering food, fuel, or medicines is monitored,  
every phone call is listened on, every email read, every dream  
snarled at, every desire crushed. Israel has the right to explode it  
to smithereens.
The shelling has not really let, don't get me wrong. It still goes on  
but it's more occasional, there are more "blank spaces" in between now.

Hezbollah
These "siege notes" have been receiving a number of reponses from  
Israelis. I have to say that most are of the annoying sort. First,  
they always begin by noting that I am intelligent and I get commended  
for my intelligence like Colin Powell gets commended for his English  
language speaking skills and you wonder what those making these  
observations expect from you and the world in the first place.  
Second, they systematically mistake expression of dissent and  
critique with Arab regimes and official discourse as some sort of a  
favorable disposition towards Israel. In other words there is,  
falsely, a tautology between regarding Israel as an enemy country and  
endorsing radical ideologies of Islamic fundamentalism or rabid  
nationalism. As if being a democrat, an egalitarian and a feminist  
implied that one could not have even more profound grounds for being  
critical of Israel and regarding that country as an enemy country  
that has sponsored and produced nothing but war, violence,  
wretchedness, misery, banditry and usurpation. And so heartened by my  
ambivalence towards this war they recommend that more conversations  
should take place between Israelis and I. Off course most propose  
that I make the effort to seek those Israeli interlocutors out. This  
extreme form of Habermas-mania, that assumes that deep conflicts can  
be "talked through" is the sumum of hubris. The experience of the  
peace process is telling: it is clear that Israelis cannot cannot  
cannot accept Palestinians as human beings whose humanity is of equal  
value as their own. This is the bottom line. And until that bottom  
line is changed, there is nothing that a member of a society that  
builds walls around itself to shut itself off from the world and shut  
the world from itself can tell me. Punto final.
One of my impromptu (Israeli) commentators warned of my candor,  
despaired at my position vis-a-vis Israel, and took generously time  
and space to explain to me that Hezbollah he/she must be crushed  
because if they were to win, they would destroy Israel and me,  
because of my values and lifestyle. This view, along with other views  
salient in western media (particularly American) of Hezbollah betrays  
ignorance. It is fatal ignorance.
The most gross miscalculation Israeli strategists are making is based  
on the assumption that Hezbollah is a) not a legitimate political  
entity in this country, b) its base is made up of extremists and c)  
its "elimination" would leave the Lebanese construct unscathed. In  
point of fact, pushing the Lebanese population to "rise up" against  
Hezbollah, or the scenario of a Lebanese implosion is the worst case  
scenario for all regional "parties", because the country would then  
become the jungle of violence and killing that Iraq is today.
Because I am a staunch secular democrat, I have never endorsed  
Hezbollah, but I do not question their legitimacy as a political  
actor on the Lebanese scene, I believe they are just as much a  
product of Lebanon's contemporary history, its war and postwar as are  
all other parties. If one were to evaluate the situation in vulgar  
sectarian terms, when it comes to representing the interests of their  
constituency they certainly do a better job than all the political  
representatives presently and in the past.
It would be utter folly (in fact it would be murderous folly) to  
regard Hezbollah as another radical Islamist terrorist organization,  
at least in the ideological and idiomatic vein of the American  
intelligentsia and punditry. (There is something about a stubbornness  
to misunderstand that betrays an intent to see a crisis linger or  
even escalate in the US. If Americans feel better being misguided  
idiots, Israelis should know better. If the Israeli intelligentsia  
wants to play deaf like Americans the only outcome will be an Iraq  
scenario, although I reiterate that Lebanon is not Iraq and the  
Lebanese are not and will not be Iraqi and will not be manipulated  
into the barbaric sectarian horror. We've tried that before and it  
does not work, and we are tired of fighting each other.)
Hezbollah is a mature political organization (that has matured  
organically within the evolution of Lebanese politics) with an  
Islamist ideology, that has learned (very quickly) to co-exist with  
other political agents in this country, as well as other sects. If  
Lebanese politics was a representation of short-sighted petty  
sectarian calculations, the lived social experience of postwar  
Lebanon was different. Sectarian segregation was extremely difficult  
to implement in the conduct of everyday social transactions, in the  
conduct of business, employment and all other avenues of commonplace  
life. And that is a capital we all carry within ourselves, there are  
exceptional moments when the country came together willingly and  
spontaneously (as with the Israeli attacks in 1993 and 1996), but  
there are other smaller, less spectacular moments that punctuate the  
lived experience of the postwar that every single Lebanese can recall  
where sectarian prejudice was utterly meaningless, experienced as  
meaningless.
When former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri was assassinated, the country  
seemed divided into two camps, the consensus was overwhelming however  
that we will not revert to fighting one another, to eliminating one  
another.
If Israel plans to annihilate Hezbollah, it will annihilate Lebanon.  
Hezbollah and its constituency are not only Lebanese in the  
perception of all, they are also a key, essential element of  
contemporary Lebanon. Moreover the specifics of UN Resolution 1559  
may have regional implications, but at heart and in essence they can  
only be resolved within the Lebanese consensus. Israel CANNOT take it  
upon itself to implement that UN resolution. There is off course  
sinister folly that Israel should implement any UN resolution  
considering its stellar record of snarling, snickering and shrugging  
at every single UN resolution that did not suit its sensibilities.
Hezbollah are not al-Qaeda, Israeli and US propaganda will portray  
them as much, and that is the downfall of public opinion, that is the  
tragedy at the root of the consensus that agrees to watching Lebanon  
burn. In more ways than can be counted they are different political  
ideologies, groups and movements. First, they are not suicidal.  
Second, they are not anti-historical. Third, they are a full-fledged  
political agent at the center of a dynamic polity. Their ideology is  
not an ideology of doom, they represent as much petty interests of  
their constituency as they are imbricated in the fabric of regional  
politics.

Israel, and Channel 2
I was watching Lise Doucet on the BBC interview one of Olmert's  
underlings yesterday after the speech. This is the folly of the  
Israelis, and I believe it will be their downfall, ultimately. He was  
lamenting that Hezbollah hit the "peaceful" city of Haifa, an Israeli  
city that he described as exemplar of coexistence between Jews,  
Christians and Muslims. Haifa! An Israeli city? Haifa? The name is  
Arabic. The jewel in the crown of Palestinian cities... A peaceful  
haven of coexistence between Jews, Muslims and Christians? My God! It  
took DECADES for Christians and Muslims to appear on the roster of  
"human beings" in the ledgers of the Israeli government. Decades of  
struggle, riots, pain and suffering. And they are still second class  
citizen, and they are still unwelcome, pushed out, day after day,  
crushed by the Israeli machine.
This eloquent underling was making the argument that Hezbollah wanted  
to destroy the city of "coexistence". Off course, he does not care  
that the city the IDF has currently under siege, the city they are  
bombing to rubble, the city where the red cross and civil rescue  
headquarters were shelled to the ground, Tyre, is itself a gorgeous  
jewel on the Lebanese coast. That it is a GENUINE city of coexistence  
amongst Christians, Shi'ites and Sunnis. And the delightful town of  
Marja'yun is also a city where sects and religions co-exist, and  
Zahleh... and so on and so forth... But no matter, the Israelis have  
always done this, and eventually, it catches up with them, and in the  
end, they realize that their narrative is so far removed from reality  
they have to back track. The key to understanding Israeli's  
relationship to our humanity lies in a text by David Grossman, one of  
Israel's foremost novelists, essayists and writers. He wrote it  
around the time of the First Intifada. Israel was then beginning to  
come into reckoning that the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza was  
no longer tenable or sound strategy for the well-being of its democracy.

By the second or third of these "siege notes", the emails reached  
Israel and Israeli blogs. A journalist from Israel's Channel 2  
contacted me by email and asked for an interview. I was uncomfortable  
with the idea at first, for fear that my words be distorted and my  
genuine, candid sentiments quoted to serve arguments I do not  
endorse. Exposing oneself with transparency has its charm and price.  
That journalist seems like a nice person, but I have no reason to  
trust her and she understands my misgivings. My only defense is  
transparency. She sent me the set of questions below for me to answer  
so she can air them on TV or use them for some report. I decided to  
share them with you all.

1. How your day looks like from the morning.  What you did today? did  
you have coffee? how do you get the news - television? radio? internet?
The routine of our days is totally changed. We now live under a  
regimen of survival under siege. Those of us still not wounded and  
not stranded do whatever needs to be done to survive until the next  
day. Coffee, yes, I have coffee in the morning, and at noon and in  
the afternoon. Perhaps I have too much coffee. The passage of time is  
all about monitoring news, checking everyone's OK, and figuring out  
what has to be done to help those in distress. News are on all the  
time. All the time, whatever media works.
There is a great need for volunteers to tend to the hundreds of  
thousands displaced now.

2. Can you describe the neighborhood you live in?
So it will be bombed? No thank you. I live in a very, very privileged  
neighborhood, far from the southern suburbs. After the evacuation of  
foreign nationals (and bi-nationals) is complete, everyone is  
expecting doom and if Israelis decide to give us a dose of tough love  
as they did in the southern suburbs my life will probably be in  
serious danger as my family's and everyone who has decided to stay here.

3. Can you say something about yourself - like what you do for  
living, if you can say.
I organize cultural events and I am a free-lance writer. I used to  
live in New York city and moved to Beirut Tuesday July 11th. I have  
no life at the present moment. I try to do a few things over the  
internet, but that's increasingly difficult.

4. Are you Lebanese or Palestinian?
Both and it gets more complicated I have Syrian blood too. And  
Turkish and Bosnian. I am the product of the Ottoman empire, and I  
say it with pride. I know it ires a lot of people. But I am VERY  
proud to claim my lineage. My father was expelled from Jerusalem in  
1948, he and his family lived in a gorgeous home in Talbiyeh. I think  
it is a day care school now. We own property in old Jerusalem as well  
and the Atlantic Hotel which was bombed by your "valiant"  
paramilitary pre-national militias in 1946.

5. In Israel our leaders think that by targeting Hezbollah and other  
places in Lebanon will make the rest of the local population against  
them. Is this true?
It is pure folly, but even if it were true it is a terrible strategy,  
an imploded Lebanon is a nightmare to all, not only the Lebanese but  
to everyone, does Israel want an Iraq at its doorstep? There seems to  
be consensus now in Israel over the military campaign. It is because  
Israelis are not yet pressing their leadership and military the smart  
questions. Do you actually believe it would be possible to eliminate  
the Shi'i sect from Lebanon, and that it would go down easy in the  
region? If the Americans are advising you, duck for cover or move.  
Need I list their record of wisdom and foresight recently? Vietnam,  
Central America, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq. If you need to listen to  
imperialists, find less idiotic ones, at least who have a sense of  
history. Gold help us all if Rumsfeld is also in charge of your well- 
being. This war will bring doom to all. Stop, cut everybody's losses.  
Wars can be stopped before the body count is "intolerable" or an  
entire country has been reduced to rubble.

6. What is the atmosphere in the streets of Beirut, if you can tell.
Beirut is quiet, dormant, huddled. We are caged, but there is  
tenacious solidarity. You have to understand that we see ourselves  
under an unwarranted attack from Israel. The capture of two soldiers  
DOES NOT justify Israel's response. There has been a status quo for  
the past 6 years that was well managed. Hezbollah was not in an  
impasse, the Olmert government was in an impasse. He ran on a  
campaign to solidify the "new" (illegitimate) borders, finish the  
wall and finalize the enclave and withdraw into the boundaries of  
that enclave. The Olmert government did not have the maturity or  
intelligence to know how to deal with the Hamas government. Your  
government was guided by arrogance. We, you and us, are here today  
because your political class is not up to the challenge. I am sorry,  
but the Hamas government was elected democratically, and there were  
myriad ways to deal with them. MYRIAD. But this is the stage of your  
destiny that you have reached, you build walls around yourselves (you  
to whom the Massada is a foundational trauma/myth!), and you chase  
barefoot, toohtless, illiterate, hungry people with state of the art  
military arsenal. And you insist that you are victims, and you insist  
that you are on the right side of history. All this bulllshit will  
catch up with you.

7. What is the atmosphere among your friends?
The consensus is solidarity. Our country is under attack. Otherwise,  
we are an exceedingly plural society every one has a theory and a  
point of view, and we co-exist. Humoring one another. What do you do  
when you are under siege? Do you eat one another, cannibalize on one  
another, or stand in solidarity to weather the storm?

8. Can you go to work, or do you have to stay home? (because some of  
the workers in the north of Israel did not go to work today)
The largest, largest majority do not go to work. Although it is a  
form of resilience. If the war goes on for longer, life will have to  
evolve a different routine. A large part of the work force is  
impaired from movement. And then there is the random shelling, it's  
also dangerous to go out. This has gone on from the first day of the  
siege. The south is now sinking in a humanitarian crisis. Beirut will  
soon.
(The new regulation by your glorious IDF this morning is to shoot at  
all moving vehicles larger than SUVs. One was just shelled in  
Ashrafieh. New danger, new things to look out for.)

9. Whatever crosses your mind.
Let's not go there... It's dark now, and I am too traumatized. I just  
want this to be over. I am waiting for a ceasefire. Are you? Is that  
too unmanly for your society? What do you need to see before you  
cease your fire? You want to hear me expire? You take down Hezbollah,  
and I am going down with them. Do you know when Hezbollah was born?  
1982. Where were you? Was it an exciting summer for you?

10. I, for example, went to my gym class this morning. I am at home  
now, listening to the radio on one side, writing mails on the other  
side. Air-condition is on, since it is extremely hot and humid in Tel  
Aviv. I live in the center of the city. Later I will go to the  
office. I think life in my city continues but in a lower volume.
Life as it were, or as previously understood, in my city has stopped.  
No gym classes, and I am accumulating cellulite, hence chances of  
finding second husband are lessened (can I make the IDF pay for  
that?). Air-conditioning is dependent on electricity or generator  
working. Power cuts are the rule now and the generator works only on  
a schedule. I like it when Israelis report their weather, it ought to  
have some cathartic virtue, because it's like a reality check one of  
the few reminders they are in this region and not in Europe. So yes,  
without air-conditioning and with power cuts, my "semitic" curls  
produce unruly coiffe and I have to admit, I am enduring siege with  
bad hair.
I am on email, but that's intermittant between two bouts of "breaking  
news"..

I hope you will wake up to the nightmare you have dragged us into. I  
hope you will want to have fire ceased as soon as possible. I hope  
you will deem our humanity as valuable as your own.

Best, Rasha.





To: fouadas at gmail.com

Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 2:27 PM

Subject: Day 8 of the Siege



Dear All,

I have to confess that writing is becoming increasingly difficult.  
Writing, putting words together to make sentences to convey meaning,  
like the small gestures and rituals that make-up the commonplace acts  
of everyday life, has begun to lose its meaning and its cathartic  
power. I am consumed with grief, there is another me trapped inside  
me that cries all the time. And crying over the death of someone is a  
very particular cry. It has a different sound, a different music and  
feels different. I dare not cry out in the open, tears have flowed,  
time and time again, but I have repressed the release of pain and  
grief. My body feels like a container of tears and grief. I am sure  
it shows in the way I walk.
Writing is not pointless per se, but it is not longer an activity  
that gives me relief. The world outside this siege seems increasingly  
far, as if it had evacuated with the bi-national passport holders and  
foreigners.

The past few days have been MURDEROUS in the south and the Beqaa  
Valley. The death toll has been increasing in a horrific exponential  
envigorated with the White House giving a green light for the  
military assault to persist. Beirut has been spared so far, but not  
the southern suburbs. Today is Day 12 of the war, the Israeli  
military has conducted 3,000 air raids on Lebanon in 12 days. Out of  
the total deaths so far, which range close to 400 (numbers are not  
definitive), almost 170 are children. The numbers of the displaced  
are increasing by the hour. Have you seen the pictures of the deaths?  
The mourners in Tyre? Have you seen the coffins lined up? And the  
grieving mothers.
It is impossible not to grieve with them, it is impossible to shut  
one's ears to their wailing. It haunts me, it echoes the walls of the  
city, it bounces off the concrete of destroyed bridges and buildings.  
In trying to explain what drove Mohammad Atta to fly an airplane into  
one of the towers of the World Trade Center, someone (I forget whom-  
sorry facts-checkers) once said to me that Atta must have felt that  
"his scream was bigger than his chest". That description stayed with  
me, I don't know if I agree with it, or if that's how Atta felt in  
reality, but it comes back to me now because I feel that my grief is  
bigger than my chest and I have no idea how to dissipate it.

The Southern Suburbs
I accompanied journalists to Haret Hreyk two days ago. I suspect I am  
still shell-shocked from the sight of the destruction. I have never,  
ever seen destruction in that fashion. Western journalists kept  
talking about a "post-apocalyptic" landscape. The American  
journalists were reminded of Ground Zero. There are no gaping holes  
in the ground, just an entire neighborhood flattened into rubble.  
Mounds, and mounds of smoldering rubble. Blocks of concrete, metal  
rods, mixed with furnishings, and the stuff that made up the lives of  
residents: photographs, clothes, dishes, CD-roms, computer monitors,  
knives and forks, books, notebooks, tapes, alarm clocks. The contents  
of hundreds of families stacked amidst smoking rubble. A couple of  
buildings had been hit earlier that morning and were still smoking,  
buildings were still collapsing slowly.
I was frightened to death and I could hear my own wailing deep, deep  
within me.
I stopped in front of one of the buildings that housed clinics and  
offices that provide social services, there seemed to be a sea of CD- 
Roms and DVDs all over. I picked up one, expecting to find something  
that had to do with the Hezbollah propaganda machine (and it is  
pretty awesome). The first one read "Sahh el-Nom 1", the second "Sahh  
el-Nom 17". "Sahh el-Nom" was a very popular sit-com (way, way before  
the concept was even identified) produced by Syrian TV in the 1960s.  
It was centered on the character of "Ghawwar el-Tosheh", who has  
become a salient figure in popular Arab culture. I smiled mournfully,  
at the irony. Around the corner passport photos and film negatives  
covered the rubble.
Haret Hreyk was a residential area. The residents, I was told by our  
driver who lived a few blocks away, were evacuated by Hezbollah to  
other places before the shelling began. Those who refused to leave  
then, left after the first round of shelling. Haret Hreyk is eerily  
ghostly, there are practically no people left in that neighborhood.  
In the two hundred meters radius removed however, life is on-going.  
Residents testified that Hezbollah was securing food, electricity and  
medicines to all those who stayed.
Haret Hreyk is also where Hezbollah had a number of their offices. Al- 
Manar TV station is located in the block that has come to be known as  
the "security compound" (or "security square"), the office of their  
research and policy studies center, and other institutions attached  
the party. It is said that in that heavily inhabited square of  
blocks, more than 35 buildings were destroyed entirely.
Hezbollah had organized a visit for journalists that day, as they had  
the day before. They provided security cover for the area for the  
international media cameras to document the destruction. There was a  
spokesperson greeting journalists. A small rotund man, dressed in a  
track suit, fancy sunglasses, a two-day old stubble carrying two  
state of the art cell phones. He spoke in concise soundbites and was  
affable. There was nothing menacing about his demeanor, in fact were  
it not for the destruction around him he looked more like he would be  
an assistant to Scolari (similar dress code and portend) than part of  
the media team of a "terrorist organization".
The security apparatus of Hezbollah was also impressive, underscoring  
the identity of Hezbollah. They were all affable, welcoming, dressed  
casually and unarmed. They all held walkie-talkies, and when looming  
danger of another Israeli air strike seemed tangible, they all  
ushered the group of some 30 (and more) journalists to clear the  
area. They issued their warnings calmly and confidently.
One of the buildings was still burning. It had been shelled earlier  
that day at dawn. Clouds of smoke were exhaling from amidst the  
ravages. The rubble was very warm, as I stepped on concrete and  
metal, my feet felt the heat.

Israeli Warfare Mystery
Doctors in hospitals in the south have testified on television that  
they a number of bodies that have reached them have an unusual,  
unfamiliar skin color. Some of surviving injured exhibit a pattern of  
burns that doctors have also never seen before. The question is  
beginning to get attention for the world community of physicians and  
human rights organization. Israel is suspected of loading its  
missiles with toxic chemicals. The fear, in addition to their  
toxicity being immediately lethal on its victims, is that the waters  
and earth may now be poisoned. The inhabitants of the south may have  
to suffer from Israel's wrath for a very, very long time, in chilling  
cold blood.
The as-Safir newspaper, the second largest running daily in Lebanon,  
has taken up the task to investigate the question.
Beyond the crime of toxic poisoning, the type of shells and bombs  
used is also astounding. I met a woman who was displaced from the  
borderig village of Yater. She is a native American, blue blood and  
apple pie, but with a hijab. She, her husband, her three babies and  
her husband's family, a total of 14 people were trapped in one room  
in their house in Yater. On the 6th or 7th day of shelling, she  
cracked and her kids could not longer handle the violence. Risking  
their lives, they jumped into their car, and decided to take their  
chance. They drove straight without stopping, taking circuitous ways  
when the main roads were impossible to tread. They expected to die on  
the road. After 14 hours of driving they made their way to the US  
embassy in the northeastern suburbs of Beirut. They were not aware of  
evacuations. They were lost on the way, and someone stole her  
husband's wallet with the 400$ in cash they carried (the totality of  
their fortune), his green card and her US passport. I came across her  
at the US embassy compound. She was trembling. She could barely tell  
her story coherently. She repeated over and over that she had seen  
houses fly, that the shells made the houses fly in the air and then  
collapse on the ground. She repeated that she ought not to have gone  
to the window, but she could not help it, she was curious, and she  
saw the houses fly.
As a holder of US passport (and real native) she had been allowed  
into the embassy. Her husband, only a green card holder, was not. The  
US embassy changed their policy, I was later told by people and  
journalists, but at various stages in the evacuation, green-card  
holders were not included in the evacuations plan. Pardon me, in the  
plans for "assisted departures".
I don't know what happened to the American mother from Portland  
Oregon and Yater south Lebanon. I know her babies are lactose  
intolerant and their only food was the stock of soy milk she had with  
her. She was very young, a face earnest, her skin transluscent white.  
In her pale blue eyes there was despair and fright that she will not  
recover from for a very long time.

The Displaced
The displaced have been dispersed in the country. They have been  
placed in schools, universities, government owned buildings. Aid is  
arriving, but still in chaotic manner. Volunteers are beginning to  
get tired. However nothing compares to the distress of the displaced.  
They are in a state of complete emotional upheaval. Their presence  
has already changed the habits and rituals of the neighborhoods where  
they have been placed.
As the sun begins to set and the harshness of its rays begins to dim,  
you find families strolling on Hamra street (a main commercial  
thoroughfare in West Beirut). Shops are closed, sandwich shops are  
closed, cafes are intermittantly open, but the sidewalk provides an  
opportunity to escape the confinement from the shelter where they  
been relocated. You can see it in their walk, their body language.  
Their pace searches for peace of mind, not for a destination, their  
lungs expand drawing in oxygen to inspire quietude and calm, not for  
cardiovascular pressure. They have a deep, mournful, sorrowful gaze.  
They left behind their entire lives, maybe even their beloved.
In Ras Beirut, small backstreets have come to life. To escape the  
heat of indoor confinement, displaced families relocated to old homes  
or government-owned buildings, have grown in the habit of placing  
plastic chairs and their narguiles on small front porches or entrance  
hallways of buildings. I had to walk home after a long day of working  
with journalists, two nights ago, and as I zigzagged through these  
back streets, I was comforted by their gentle presence. They chatted,  
softly, quietly, huddled in groups, watching the night unfold,  
fearful of the sound of Israeli warplanes.
The ceaseless newscast from a radio kept everyone informed. It too  
sounded softly. It was a gentle summer night, and the families  
dispersed and uprooted surrendered to the gentleness of the night.
On the next block, three young woman stood in line, queuing for  
access to a public payphone. That too has become a familiar sight in  
Beirut. People lining at public payphones. They stood, clearly tired  
but resilient. To my "good evening", I was greeted back with smiles  
and another "good evening". I was relieved to see that they felt  
safe, that they roamed the city at night without qualms. How long can  
they afford to pay for these phone calls is another question. There  
is a definite need for a long term plan. This emergency solution will  
soon reach a crisis, and state structures need to be prepared to face  
the anger and frustration of nearly 500,000 people.
On the next block, a Mercedes car packed with people was parked at a  
corner, in front of the entrance of a building. The car's doors were  
flung open and the radio broadcast news. It was a visit. Two  
displaced families on a nightly visit. Everyone was gentle, and a  
soft breeze blew with clemency.



---- Original Message -----

From: RASHA

To: undisclosed-recipients:

Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 2:02 PM

Subject: Notes from the Siege 9&10



Dear All,

My siege notes are beginning to disperse. I write disjointed  
paragraphs but I cannot discipline myself to write everyday. Despair  
overwhelms me. A profoundly debilitating sense of uselessness and  
helplessness. Writing does not always help, communicating is not  
always easy, finding the words, deciding which stories should be  
included, and which should not. The experience of this siege is so  
emotionally and psychically draining, the situation is so politically  
tenuous...
I miss the world. I miss life. I miss myself. People around me also  
go through these ups and downs, but I find them generally to be more  
resilient, more steadfast, more courageous than I. I am consumed by  
other people's despair. It's not very smart, I mean for a strategy of  
survival.

My day started today (in effect it is Day 13 of the War, but just  
another morning under siege in my personal experience) with news from  
Bint Jbeil, reported on al-Jazira. Ghassan Ben Jeddo, the director of  
the Beirut office was analyzing the situation on the southern front  
in Bint Jbeil. He announced flatly that Hezbollah had conceded to the  
military surrender of Bint Jbeil, that the IDF had besieged the town,  
and that the town had been almost entirely flattened to rubble. My  
breathing became tight. I knew well, and had been told for days, that  
military defeats and victories were very tricky to determine in this  
type of unusual warfare, because a conventional army has clear  
retreats and advances whereas a band of guerrillas behaves in an  
entirely different way. The military defeat in itself did not really  
matter enough to cause tightness in my chest, although I was a little  
worried about the IDF feeling empowered to proceed with "scorched  
earth" plans or some other nightmarish fantasy. My breathing became  
tight because I immediately thought about some 1,500 people, making  
up some 400 families whom I had heard the day before were trapped in  
Bint Jbeil. Some were displaced from villages around Bint Jbeil. They  
were trapped there in two buildings, one of which was a government  
school. I could not imagine what they were living. As the al-Jazira  
showed footage from around Bint Jbeil, there was a continuous  
soundtrack of pounding from Israeli tanks. I could only see them and  
hear that pounding: were they huddled together? Were they laid down  
on the floor, their hands over their heads? How does one survive 2  
days of continuous shelling like that? Had they any hope of fleeing?
They stayed with me, 1500 souls in Bint Jbeil. I went to the public  
garden where displaced people were now living, I went to the  
cooperative supermarket in Sabra, I went to an air-conditioned cafe  
with WiFi, and the 1500 souls were with me. I had lunch, tried to  
write, still with me. Until after sunset, a journalist friend told me  
he had interviewed the mayor of Bint Jbeil in the afternoon. The man  
had suffered a stroke this past Sunday and had been evacuated for  
treatment. By today he had recovered and was struggling to find a way  
to get the remaining 40 Lebanese-Americans trapped in Bint Jbeil. My  
friend allowed me to sigh with some relief, the trapped souls were  
400 not 1,500 today...  (Most of the residents of Bint Jbeil are  
Lebanese-Americans from Dearborn and Detroit Michigan.)

Is there a point to relaying on to you the events of the past few  
days? I am still stuck to the television. I am still living from  
breaking news to breaking news. I now get things from the second-tier  
horse's mouth, so to speak, journalists whom I have taken to hovering  
around.
Khiyam shall soon be rubble. As is Bint Jbeil. After Khiyam will be  
Tyre. The Beqaa has received pounding. Israelis targetted factories,  
some operational, others under construction. None were Hezbollah  
fortresses off course. They also hit a UNIFIL outpost last night  
killing UN international observers.

This will be a long note because it is a cluster from the past few  
days. It will most likely be a tedious read. It reflects my  
encounters these past few days, conversations and discussions with  
friends journalists and analysts as well as vignettes from Beirut  
under siege. As I attempt to tie all of these sections together, I am  
back at the Cafe with WiFi. Yesterday they played the soundtrack from  
Lawrence of Arabia. I don't know if they were aware of the "post- 
colonial" and "postpost-colonial" dimension. Condi was in Jerusalem.  
The Bedouins were firing rockets at Haifa. And Faisal spoke late into  
the night, promising the rockets would go further than Haifa.
Today, they have a Charles Aznavour playlist. Somebody with executive  
power in this cafe is a shameless sentimental. This is the first sign  
of a return to normalcy in my experience so far. I, an unrepentant  
sentimental as well, am very fond of Aznavour, this playlist has been  
the soundtrack to my convalescence from amorous setbacks, it is a  
first tangibe reminder that I had once a different life.

Hezbollah, now the symbol
It took a few days into this war for Hezbollah to acquire a new power  
of signification. The semiologists, the political sociologists, and  
hords of regional experts and policy advisors have to watch this  
carefully, they better at least, if they are to understand this  
moment and the new political idiom. And they have quite something to  
contend with, Hassan Nasrallah's pronouncements, al-Manar TV, the  
video productions, the manufacture of image and meaning.
Hezbollah have now become the only Arab force to have refused to  
accomodate, even slightly, Israel's missives and caprices. They are  
undaunted by the military might of the IDF, its awesome ability to  
bring wretchedness to a people and a country and its ability to shrug  
at international laws regulating warfare, conflict and non- 
aggression. They are also undaunted by the moral highground provided  
by the US, and presently the Arab League and the International  
Community (whoever this construct stands for). In that, they have won  
the hearts and minds of Arab masses. The so-called Arab street (that  
vague beguiling force at once vociferous and inept that the western  
media have reified into a pressure valve of the potential/appetite  
for Terror â?"or anti-western sentiment) has been won in heart and  
mind by Hezbollah's retaliation to the Israeli assault. The Arab  
world is mesmerized by this movement that has developped the ability  
to fight back, inflict pain and for the first time in the history of  
the Arab-Israeli conflict pause a real threat to Israel. Hezbollah  
does not have the ability to defeat the Israeli army. No one in the  
region can and none of the Arab states is willing, in gest or merely  
using the power of suggestion, to challenge Israel's absolute  
hegemony. (I don't know whether Iran can or not, but in principle  
Israel's military abilities are superior to the Islamic Republic's  
conventional army.)
In its careful study of a military strategy for defense, conducted in  
full cognizance of the movement's weakness and strength and of  
Israel's weakness and strength, Hezbollah has achieved what all Arab  
states have failed to achieve. Since the war broke out, Hassan  
Nasrallah has displayed a persona and public behavior also to the  
exact opposite of Arab heads of states, he may be in the  
"underground" for security reasons, but he is not discheveled, he  
speaks in a cautious, calculated calm, a quiet dignity. His adresses  
have been punctuated with key notions that have long lapsed from the  
everyday political vocabulary in the Arab world: responsibility (for  
defeat, victory and the toll on Lebanon), dignity, justice,  
compassion (for the suffering inflicted on people and for the  
Palestinian Israeli victims of Hezbollah shelling in Nazareth and  
Haifa). A stark contrast with the political class in the Arab world  
that speaks of "calculated retreats", "compromises for peace", and  
the real politik convictions that induce Amr Moussa to cast himself  
as the gesticulating pantomime for the Saudis and the Americans. In  
an interview with al-Jazira, Ahmad Fouad Najm, the famous Egyptian  
popular poet quoted a Cairene street sweeper who said to him that  
Hassan Nasrallah brought back to life the dead man buried inside him.  
This is the "pulse" of the much-dreaded Arab street. This too is a  
measure of Israel's miscalculation. Moreover, at the moment when  
Sunnis and Shi'as have been blinded in murderous rage in Iraq, when  
Idiot-King Abdullah of Jordan and a handful Barbaric Wahabi pundits  
babbled on about the dangerous emergence of a "Shi'i crescent" in the  
region, Israel's assault has brought to the fore a solidarity that  
transcends the Sunni-Shi'a divide in the Arab world, and consolidated  
a front of those who reject Israeli hegemony and those who cower to  
it in fear.
This new symbolic power beyond the boundaries of Lebanon was willed  
by Hezbollah in the postwar, it peeked in 1996, when Israel conducted  
its notorious "Operation Grapes of Wrath". After the Israeli  
withdrawal from south Lebanon, Hezbollah claimed the credit for  
liberation. Some analysts saw the Israeli withdrawal from the  
occupied south as a strategic move to end the "Lebanon" file, and  
deprive Syria from a crucial hand in its negotiations with Israel  
(Hafez el-Assad died shortly after). Other analysts saw the Israeli  
withdrawal as Hezbollah's defeat of the IDF in a long, long war of  
attrition. Nevertheless, Hezbollah represented itself in its  
propaganda machine as the only armed force in the Arab and Muslim  
world to have in fact defeated Israel.
In this present crisis, and from Hassan Nasrallah's first  
pronouncement (the radio/audio adress he delivered), the "open"  
belligerance that Israel is conducting on Lebanon has been  
represented as a turning point battle in the saga of the Arab-Israeli  
conflict. A saga replete with humiliating defeats for Arab armies, a  
turning point because Hezbollah promised to deliver a victory (as it  
has achieved many victories in the past). In other words, he  
transformed this present conflict from a "Lebanese" question into an  
Arab and regional conflict.
The significance of defeat and victory is bearing a deep impact far  
and beyond the boundaries of Lebanon. This is one of the reasons  
Condoleeza Rice's notion of a "New Middle East" smacks of first rate  
hubris. The "New Middle East" is taking shape elsewhere, or the real  
new Middle East is here, and there is little the White House, Ehud  
Olmert, 23-ton shells autographed by the beautiful children of Israel  
(the pictures are quite astounding) dropped in the middle of refugee  
camps to unearth underground bunkers of "terrorism", can do about it.
In the first few days of the Israeli assault on Lebanon, there was  
barely any movement in Arab capitals. The Arab world seemed content  
watching us burn on TV, our fate seemed sealed with the Arab League  
meeting. I remember writing my rage in one of these dispatches.  
However, after Nasrallah's first adress, which ended with the  
spectacularly staged shelling of the Israeli warship, Hezbollah's  
sustained ability to hold its fort and to shell cities as far as  
Haifa and Nazareth, in addition to the sight of Israel's sustained  
massacres of civilians and destruction of Lebanon, turned the tide.  
Hezbollah's position in the region and in Arab consciousness is  
etched with an empowering, envigorating significance.

The New Middle East, Conspiracy and Hassan Nasrallah's televised adress
Condoleezza Rice showed up in Beirut two days ago. The message she  
carries is that the US will not enforce a ceasfire. Israel estimates  
it needs an additional week before the atmosphere is "conducive" to a  
ceasefire. This means they need a week to achieve their aims. Their  
aims have changed over the past two weeks, although they have  
formulated a set of demands to the White House and the G8.
Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Saniora on his way to the Rome  
conference said he did not expect the meeting to produce a ceasefire.  
Only Kofi Anan seems to expect that from this high-profile meeting.
She did not speak of a New Middle East in Lebanon, in fact there were  
no public pronouncements made in Lebanon, but she did hold several  
press conferences in Israel, where reference was made to this new  
map. The "New Middle East" has not been officially unveiled by the  
Americans.
It emerges at a moment when Israel has failed at undermining Hamas  
with all the means the world has afforded to support it: diplomatic  
pressure from the US and EU, an effective paralysis of Hamas' ability  
to govern, an internal conflict between Hamas and Fateh, the  
incarceration of cabinet members and parliamentarians, a humanitarian  
siege, and a full scale military assault on Gaza. The Palestinian  
population has yet to unseat Hamas or question the legitimacy of its  
position.
This moment is also when Iraq seems to have effectively slipped into  
a civil war and the US and UK occupation forces are neck-deep in a  
quagmire with violence escalating to frightful scale. Civil conflicts  
and violence develop a momentum and logic of their own that create  
their own hell, and Iraq seems to be teetering at the precipice of  
this hell with no sign of decisive and effective intervention to  
bring it to a halt. This moment is also when the negotiations with  
Iran over the development of nuclear weapons are taking baby steps  
and in circles.
With the war in Lebanon, the "moment" in which the "New Middle East"  
is unveiled is a moment where Hezbollah has emerged as a force that  
is able to humiliate the Israeli military on the field of battle, and  
represent the Israeli civilan leadership as reckless, confused and  
bloodthirsty. Hezbollah define their victory as maintaining their  
ability to deter Israel from assaulting Lebanon, namely, deterring a  
ground attack (the battle in a cluster of villages has been going on  
for 5 days now) but mostly firing rockets and missiles into the  
Israeli interior. In that regard, they are so far victorious.
So the question is on what grounds are the US, Israel and the EU  
imagining the "New Middle East"? And how do they imagine its  
implementation?

Past midnight last night, al-Manar television announced they would  
broadcast a pre-recorded adress by Hassan Nasrallah. He wanted to  
present his views and reactions to the diplomatic activity that has  
been taking place in the past few days. He also wanted to send a  
message to the nation, Israel and the wider world regarding  
Hezbollah's strategy in this conflict. For Nasrallah the "New Middle  
East" was the final indication that Israel's assault was premeditated  
(and part of a greater US plan) and that Hezbollah's victory would be  
the principal bullwark to thwarting the conspiracy of this "New  
Middle East". He also revealed that Hezbollah had now received  
information that Israel had planned the assault on Lebanon and  
Hezbollah for September or October. Israel planned to roll a massive  
ground force across the borders, with a cover from the air targetting  
Hezbollah leadership and roads and bridges that aimed at crippling  
the movement from responding. The element of surprise was key to the  
success of that military strategy. With the present conflict, Israel  
had proceeded with its plans, but without the element of surprise.  
And that is one of the reasons Hezbollah have the upper hand so far.  
And finally, he reiterated the "surprises" that Hezbollah had  
delivered to Israel thus far: the warship, hitting as far into  
Israeli territory as Tabariya, hitting as far as Haifa. He announced  
that Hezbollah was now ready to hit targets "beyond Haifa", at a time  
of their choosing. Did he mean Tel Aviv? Would he hit Tel Aviv? Was  
it his retaliation at psychological warfare?
This morning, Olmert's office announced they had heard Nasrallah's  
threat and would respond accordingly.

More on Being a Proud Arab
Saudi Arabia pledged hundreds of millions of dollars in aid and  
whatever to help Lebanon in these tragic times. I wish the political  
class of this country had the spine and intelligence to reject this  
fortune or negotiate its political cost from the position of the  
empowered. Hezbollah is changing the terms, and unfortunately the  
cabinet of Fouad Saniora, as well as the Hariri movement is still  
behaving in total subservience to Saudi Arabia, protecting Saudi  
hegemony in this country and the region.
The Jordanians sent us a plane load of emergency relief supplies. It  
just landed in our destroyed airport. The Israelis gave the Jordanian  
plane the security cover. Jordan and Kuwait are sending environmental  
experts to help us clean the sea from the oil and fuel spills that  
Israelis dumped. Did I mention this? Did I mention that after their  
warships retreated to a distance safe from Hezbollah's firepower,  
they spilled enough oil to cause an environmental disaster on our  
coastline? Did I mention that no one has been to fish a fish and that  
the shores are now pitch black?

This said, I still cannot get over, or forgive the Saudi, Egyptian  
and Jordanian actions vis-a-vis the Israeli war on Lebanon. There was  
a chance to stand upright, to redress from the hunch of servility.  
For a moment there was an opportunity to salvage dignity and turn the  
tables for good. They chose to cower, to protect US and Israeli  
interest and extend moral cover for Israel to destroy this country.  
The Arab League is complicit in the destruction of this country.  
Fawwaz Traboulsi said it time and time again on television stations,  
they have a myriad means at their disposal to shake Israel and the US  
if only to impose red lines, to defend a notion of sovereignty. They  
could have withdrawn their ambassadors from Israel, they could have  
suspended the peace accords with Israel, they could have threatened a  
regional escalation during the Arab League meeting. Saudi Arabia  
could have used its hegemony over the oil market or its deposits in  
US banks. Instead, Amr Moussa opined that the road map for peace was  
defunct. This is servile complicity.
Imagine how much they would have gained in the eyes of their  
societies and as regional actors, had they simply stood in one line- 
up in the face of Israel. Obviously, it is hubris on my part to  
imagine these heads of states capable of any action beyond  
humiliating subservience. This is one of the meanings of defeat. The  
total relinquishing of agency and dignity.
The political culture that prevails in the Arab world has a very  
select cast of roles for officials (whether elected or not), at heart  
they are variations on three main roles: taxidermists, court-jesters  
and kitchen undercooks (the more accurate word is in French,  
"marmitons"). They resurrect dead effigies, brandish defunct  
ideologies, they gesticulate and throw fits to soothe, distract, and  
deter, or they slice and dice, pick-up the peels and clean-up in the  
"big kitchen" of regional politics. This too is a face of defeat.
There has been much, much ink spilled on the impact of "defeat" on  
Arab societies, identity, political culture, etc. The other meaning  
of defeat is the inability to imagine political alternatives beyond  
the debilitating bi-polar pathology (and I use the metaphor with the  
psychic disorder in mind) of US/Israel vs. fundamentalist political  
Islam. These simply cannot be the two options for citizenship,  
identity, governance and political representation. (Perhaps it is  
impossible in Palestine because occupation is war, and war creates  
situations in extremis â?"and yet the Palestinians, Moslems and  
Christians, did not cower from electing Hamas into government, in  
cognizance of the costs). And so far, that "third" option (obviously  
not Blair's "Third Way") is not yet clear or cogent.
In the present conflict, a secular egalitarian democrat such as I,  
has no real place for representation or maneuver. Neither have I and  
my ilk succeeded in carving a space for ourselves, nor have the  
prevailing forces (the two poles) agreed to making allocations for  
us. That is our defeat and our failure. In Lebanon, we are caught in  
the stampede and the cross-fire. As I noted in one of these siege  
notes, I am not a supporter of Hezbollah, but this has become a war  
with Israel. In the war with Israel, there is no force in the world  
that will have me stand side by side with the IDF or the Israeli state.
It was my foolhardy hope, that the Lebanese front that emerged after  
the mass mobilization on March 14th would rehabilitate its nearly  
depleted political capital (depleted down to its most base and vulgar  
sectarian constituencies) and refuse to meet with Condoleeza Rice.  
Out of principle that the US and Israel are waging a war on one of  
the chief agents in Lebanon's political landscape. Instead, all these  
handsome men and women showed up at the US embassy, smiling, wearing  
their Sunday suits, aping the display of servility that the Idiot- 
Kings and Senile-Presidents-for-Life display at the Arab league  
meetings. She showed up at the embassy and enjoyed this band of court- 
jesters and taxidermists society while the Depleted Uranium Smart  
Bombs were delivered from the US military base in Qatar to Israel.
Was I foolhardy to have once seen an opportunity for change when the  
March 14th mobilization swept the capital? Surely now, in light of  
this war. And you would think that by reading newspapers, this band  
of brothers (and sisters) would learn something. You would think that  
by watching what happened to their equivalent band of brothers in  
Fateh would inspire another behavior. To no avail. Look at the  
pathetic story of Mohammad Dahlan. Once a proud young man from Gaza,  
once a hero of the Palestinian resistance, once a prisoner in  
Israel's gaols, once a popular leader in the streets of Gaza. He was  
so corrupted by power, he became the US Foreign Secretary's Boy Toy.  
His street smarts became thuggery, his humble origins fed his  
appetite for cheap thrills: nice suits that he never hung well on his  
shoulders, fancy cars that he never had a chance to drive on decent  
roads, fine cuisine that he never knew how to order and first class  
tickets to capitals where he flew to surrender more and more and more  
servility. The story of Dahlan, although small and borderline  
insignificant should be told to children. I look forward to the day  
when he will not be able to walk in the streets of Palestine.. Why do  
I single out Dahlan when so many others like him roam the unpaved  
roads of Palestine, because for a brief moment I believed he was a  
man. A time long ago that I cannot recall now.

In Lebanon, the Displaced, the Schizophrenia
Within Lebanon, the situation is different. The White House and  
Israel are hedging their bets on an internal rift. The most dangerous  
would be a Sunni-Shi'i divide. So far the country has been united,  
but warning signs are let out everyday. The sectarian polarization is  
still cut grossly along the lines of the pro-Syrian and anti-Syrian  
camps, they cut across the conventional sectarian rifts that  
polarized the country during the civil war, and to some extent in the  
postwar. In every speech, Hassan Nasrallah has hailed and expressed  
gratitude for the fantastic popular support that has rallied around  
the resistance. The council for sunni religious associations met  
yesterday, reiterating their support for the resistance and  
condemning the silence and cowardice of the Arab world.

It is compelling to see the hords of volunteers tend to the  
displaced. There are two main organizations channeling emergency aid  
and resources to the NGOs tending to the displaced, they are the  
Hariri Foundation and the National Relief agency. The management of  
relocating and lodging the displaced has been less than ideal, and I  
am of the opinion that the government has not really galavanized its  
full abilities to face up to the crisis. The Ministry of Social  
Affairs, the Ministry of Health and other concerned public agencies  
are coordinating efforts to bring some order into the chaos. However,  
there is increasing critique that they are not marshalled as they  
were in the past. True the scale of displacement is harrowing and  
keeps increasing everyday and the government has never had to contend  
with a challenge so tremendous. We now count 800,000 people who are  
displaced. Access to shelters, schools and other sites of relocation  
has been uneven. Problems have begun to emerge. I have made an effort  
to collect as many anecdotes as possible, to get an overall sense of  
the situation. So far, I have not been able to. The overwhelming  
question seems to be managing the distress and frustration of the  
displaced and the exhaustion of volunteers. The crisis seems to drag,  
and longer term solutions will have to be implemented because  
immediate emergency solutions are usually not sustainable over time.
The anecdotes tell stories of everyday heroes and everyday greed and  
sectarian prejudice. It's a mixed bag. Unanimously however, the work  
that Bahia Hariri, sister of slain former Prime Minister Rafic  
Hariri, and parliamentarian from Sidon (the northernmost first city  
in south Lebanon), has been stellar. Using the arm of the Hariri  
Foundation in Sidon, she is housing 12,500 displaced from the south  
(mostly Shi'ites) and tending to all their needs.. There are ironic  
anecdotes too, for example schools in the Palestinian refugee camp of  
Ain el-Helweh have been opened to house Lebanese refugees.

The brunt of this war are felt unevenly in the country. The eastern  
suburb of the city and significant areas in the mountains have been  
more or less spared from shelling and violence. Occasional Israeli  
air raids spread fear. The targetting of the broadcast tower for the  
major Lebanese television stations that claimed the life of an  
employee at the LBC (Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation) was a  
poignant reminder, but the astounding wretchedness inflicted on the  
South and the Beqa'a have not been inflicted elsewhere.
This is not atypical of Lebanon's exprience of its civil war and of  
the postwar occupation of south Lebanon. This dysynchrony in  
"experiencing" the Israeli assault translates sometimes to a  
schizophrenia. There are people sun-tanning, partying, taking it easy  
while others are displaced. This too is part of the political class's  
engagement in the war. They could inspire a different mindset.
In the Israeli invasion of 1982, I was in West Beirut. I was 13 years  
old. All my friends and classmates fled the siege of West Beirut. The  
political rifts were different then, but I remember that when I  
returned to school after the withdrawal of the Israeli forces that  
fall, I carried the burden of the trauma of the siege while my  
classmates had memories of fun and games of that summer spent in the  
mountains. While they recalled witnessing shells fall on Beirut from  
a distance, I recalled their sound as they exploded. I resented all  
the stories they told of that summer. They were all happy stories. I  
shut my ears when they recalled them. Until now, there are a set of  
songs that were popular then, that I cannot hear without feeling a  
pinch of anxiety in my stomach. It's the impact of that trauma. Part  
of the reason I cannot leave Beirut is that I don't want to become  
like them. It's like a pledge I made to myself. But this is happening  
again, on a smaller scale, because the shelling has reached beyond  
the southern suburbs of Beirut and the south.
These distances that separate the people of this country have to be  
bridged somehow. The "united" front has to find a more cogent gel. We  
have everything to win if we are able to meet that challenge. We have  
our country to win. If we remain hapless victims who beg, and who  
remain beholden to the "charity" of Arabs we will never have full  
sovereignty... Hezbollah's victory can be articulated to become  
Lebanon's victory (this too might be naive folly on my part, but I  
need to believe this, at least for the next few days, so just humor  
me). Particularly now that the Syrians are making noises about plans  
to roll their rusted tanks and army of underfed and illiterate  
soldiers with its thuggish command back in the country.
I am so weary of the return of Syrian control over Lebanon. The  
Syrian people, all those pictured cursing the Lebanese for their  
arrogance and lack of gratitude should protest against a re-entry of  
the Syrian military into Lebanon. And if the self-described "last  
fort of dignity of the Arabs" are inspired to fight Israel, they have  
the entire front of the Golan to do so. The Lebanese will not  
liberate the Golan, the Syrians will have to. You don't subcontract  
liberation. Moreover, Hezbollah has claimed time and time again that  
they are prepared for the long haul and don't need a bullet from any  
of the Arab states.This is another reason for the Lebanese political  
forces to band around the resistance and shield the country.We might  
have a chance to rebuild this country without owing a percentage of  
every contract to a thug from the Syrian junta, and that feels like  
humane relief.

I will end this siege note with another of the obsessions that taunt  
me. People caught under rubble. In describing the surreptitious  
commonplace horror of the civil war in a televised interview perhaps  
ten years ago, the famous Lebanese novelist Elias Khoury drew the  
following scene. While everyday life was taking place, traffic,  
transactions, just the mundane stuff of life, and as you walked  
passed buildings, you knew that in the underground of that  
commonplace building, there might be someone kidnapped, waiting to be  
traded or simply held in custody for money or whatever reasons  
militias kidnapped for. And you walked by that building.
I am haunted by the nameless and faceless caught under rubble. In the  
undergrounds of destroyed buildings or simply in the midst of its  
ravages. Awaiting to be given a proper burial.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/attachments/20060726/ef55bf69/attachment.html 


More information about the reader-list mailing list