[Reader-list] Nangla: Supreme Court stays demolitions
Aniruddha Shankar
karim at sarai.net
Wed May 3 11:51:38 IST 2006
On the 5th of April the High Court had ordered that the undemolished houses in
Nanglamachi be "removed" without waiting for resettlement of the affected persons.
During the last month the teachers and staff of the Ankur Society for
Alternatives in Education and Cybermohalla practitioners have been working
tirelessly to prevent the destruction of the homes that remain in Nangla. They
have been collecting and verifying documentation, conducting interviews and have
produced a substantial narrative that testifies to the fact that NanglaMachi has
been settled for 25 years, and that the inhabitants of Nanglamachi came to Delhi
to look for work. Apart from government documentation such as decades old Ration
Cards, Below Poverty Line Certificates and Voter ID cards, a clear picture also
emerges that Nangla was literally created by these people on top of a toxic fly
ash swamp on the banks of the Yamuna decades ago.
This narrative has been critical in the framing of a writ petition before the
Supreme Court which, after laying out the background and context of the
inhabitants of Nangla seeks to stop the impending demolitions.
The petition draws on established law flowing from the Constitution, the
decisions of the Supreme Court, international laws and covenants, natural
justice and, critically, the established scheme of the Delhi State Government on
the relocation of settlements such as Nangla that was framed with the approval
of the Central Government.
This scheme states that those who have established their homes before 31.01.1990
are entitled to an 18 sq.m. plot of land while those who have established their
homes between 01.02.1990 and 31.12.1998 are entitled to a plot of 12.5 sq.m.
The scheme states that the relocation would be partially financed by the
relocatees who will pay a sum of Rs. 7,000/- before being allotted a site.
The policy also states that the emphasis will not be on large scale relocations
and that relocations will not take place without a specific use being envisaged
for the site to be cleared. In my opinion, this is very important, as there is
no clear statement from anyone setting out the purpose for which the land that
Nangla stands on now will be used.
The scheme states that the major emphasis will be on in-situ upgradation of the
settlement, through widening of roads and alignment of plots and that the
settlements would come under the Environmental Improvement in Urban Areas Scheme
which looks at the provision of basic amenities and sanitation.
This policy has been affirmed by the Supreme Court which has further stated that
the land plots should be situated near adequate transport and other resources.
The petition argues that the demolition of Nangla has taken place in complete
contravention of these established practices and laws. In my opinion, this is an
example of the Court exercising the administrative and executive functions that
are the duty and right of the state, part of a larger process whereby the
judiciary is "forced" to "step in" to "stem the rot".
The petition claims that almost all residents of Nangla are fully covered by the
extant scheme of the State government and that the order of removal ignores this
fact.
In an order granting interim relief to the petitioners, the Supreme Court has
stayed the demolitions until the 9th of May, 2006.
So a thin ray of hope for the Nanglamachi residents but to sound a note of
caution, this is a very pivotal arena which we have now entered. An adverse
decision by this court could affect the lives of hundreds of millions of people.
Much hangs in the balance.
Will keep you all posted. If anyone wants a copy of the order, the petition or
the synopsis, please mail me.
Aniruddha Shankar
More information about the reader-list
mailing list