[Reader-list] Proclamation of Emergency and CPO in United States
yasir ~
yasir.media at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 01:42:49 IST 2007
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: naeem sadiq <naeemsadiq at gmail.com>
Proclamation of Emergency and CPO in United States
November 3, 2007
Chief of Staff US Army, General George Tracy today issued a
proclamation declaring Emergency, suspending the 1787 US
Constitution, dismissing all judges of the superior courts, placing
Supreme Court Chief Justice John H Roberts. under house arrest,
placing a ban on media, and taking away fundamental human rights of
all US citizens. He also arrested the President of the American Bar
Association William Lukenorm and four other prominent attorneys and
sent them to the Guantanamo Bay's Detention Camp X-Ray. He issued
executive orders that despite being a serving military General, he is
eligible to contest elections for the post of the President of USA .
He then went to the outgoing US Congress and asked them to give him a
vote of confidence, if they know what is good for them. He then
declared himself the President of USA for next five years. In order to
ensure continuity of justice , he reduced the age of judges and picked
up sixty odd youngsters , who were duly bribed or coerced to take
oath under the new rules made by the Chief of the Army Staff. These
rules are called CPO or Chief's Personal Orders, and these judges
referred to as CPO judges.
Many countries of the world have indicated grave concern over the
new developments in USA and expressed hope that General Tracy would
soon have the country back on the path of democracy.
December 15, 2005
General George Tracy today removed the state of emergency, lifted CPO
and restored the US constitution. However before its restoration,
the following changes were made to the constitution.
Actions of declaring the emergency and proclamation of CPO were legal
orders and can neither be challenged nor require a ratification by the
Congress.
Actions of sacking all judges and putting them under house were
legal orders and can neither be challenged nor require a ratification
by the Congress.
The new judges who took oath under the Chief's Personal Orders (CPO)
are the legal judges of USA and this action can neither be challenged
nor requires a ratification by the next Congress.
A serving military General who has taken oath not to take part in
politics and to uphold the constitution can now violate, suspend or
amend the constitution in what ever manner he feels like and these
actions can neither be challenged nor require a ratification by the
Congress.
Many countries of the world have expressed great satisfaction at the
restoration of constitution in USA and have expressed hope that the
country would soon be back on the path of full democracy.
Meanwhile Leaders of Democratic and Republican parties have assured
General Tracy of their full support and complete participation in the
next general elections scheduled to be held on January 8, 2008.
_______________________________________________
All mailing list
All at talk.pakvoices.net
http://talk.pakvoices.net/listinfo.cgi/all-pakvoices.net
More information about the reader-list
mailing list