[Reader-list] gujrat election

TaraPrakash taraprakash at gmail.com
Fri Dec 28 07:39:26 IST 2007


Nice to be back again on the list.
Don't know how I got unsubscribed and my messages started getting bounced.
So here is one of them forwarded again.

Regards
----- Original Message ----- 
From: TaraPrakash 
To: Kshmendra Kaul ; reader-list at sarai.net 
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Reader-list] gujrat election


Dear Kshmendra.
The first major attack on the democracy in India, I believe,  came in the form of the emergency imposed by Indira Gandhi. Of course, there were certain supporters of the emergency and there still are some, but for the first time Congress was voted out of the power in the center. Very soon, however, the elections had to be held again which resulted in congress coming back. It did not mean that people had forgiven Indira Gandhi for the attrocities commited during the emergency. But people did not have any solid alternative. Electoral victory does not always mean that people have given you a clean chit.
The party which was alternative to Modi's winning party was no better in the opinion of the voters in Gujarat. Supporting Congress might have been interpreted as a support to the policies of the center government run by the Congress. So may be you should take Modi's victory as rejection of the policies of the central government by the people of Gujarat. Don't forget that the way Congress had organized its election campaign, it was depending on the high command more than the local leaders. But, of course,  you are free to have your opinion and believe that people were actually mesmerized by Modi.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Kshmendra Kaul 
  To: TaraPrakash ; reader-list at sarai.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 4:17 AM
  Subject: Re: [Reader-list] gujrat election


  Dear Tara Prakash

  I already accepted your earlier stated clarification that you do not want to homogenise.

  I am now trying to make sense of what "exactly" you meant. So let me re-state my enquiries:

  1. If all the 'forces' named by you ( so-called pseudo secular forces + soft Hindutva forces + major part of the hard-core Hindutva forces) were pitted against Modi, then who are the ones that voted  Modi back into government?????? It cannot be the "hard-core Hindutva forces" because according to you the major part of them were against Modi. Who therefore does Modi represent??????

  2. If a substantial part of the 65% vote (in the Gujarat election) was secured by those who you call the representatives of evil "main forces" (as per Tara Prakash, whether they won or lost), then wouldnt a logical deduction from Tara Prakash's premise be that those participating voters were "evil" too??????

  These are questions. Of course you can say "I said what I said and I do not care what meanings are conveyed or whether anything meaningful is conveyed at all; I said what I said" 

  Kshmendra Kaul


  TaraPrakash <taraprakash at gmail.com> wrote:
    If this is how you understand the message, let this be the import of my message. I of course do not want to homogenize in any circumstance. 
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Kshmendra Kaul 
      To: TaraPrakash ; reader-list at sarai.net 
      Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2007 8:01 AM
      Subject: Re: [Reader-list] gujrat election


      Dear Tara Prakash

      Your words were very clear and did not need any interpretation by me. Maybe it was an unfortunate turn of phrase and words by you. In any case, now, you have clarified that you did not mean that all Hindus are evil.

      You have again said some interesting things. For one:

      """""" Not only so-called pseudo secular forces or soft Hindutva forces were campaigning against Modi, but major part of the hard-core Hindutva forces were also against him.""""

      If all the 'forces' named by you were pitted against Modi, then who are the ones that voted  Modi back into government? It cannot be the "hard-core Hindutva forces" because according to you the major part of them were against Modi. 

      AND you go on to say:

      """"" I stick to my opinion that the main forces contesting these election both represented evil."""""

      Gujarat had a 65% voter turn-out. That is quite a high percentage for any part of the world. If a substantial part of this 65% vote was secured by those who you call the representatives of evil "main forces" (whether they won or lost), then those participating voters would be "evil" too.

      So, in the "Gujarat according to Tara Prakash" it was 'mainly' the 'evil' contesting and 'mainly' the 'evil' voting.

      Kshmendra Kaul



      TaraPrakash <taraprakash at gmail.com> wrote:
        Dear Kshmendra.
        An intriguing interpretation of my message.
        I did not intend to homogenize Hindus, as the message I was responding to, did.
        I don't see Hindu farmers getting anything positive from Modi's policies. Nor other poor Hindus.
        Not only so-called pseudo secular forces or soft Hindutva forces were campaigning against Modi, but major part of the hard-core Hindutva forces were also against him. In this specific "electoral fight" even if Modi had lost there would not be much positive expected. 
        I stick to my opinion that the main forces contesting these election both represented evil. It does not mean that I am calling Hindus evil. The evil had to be elected because there were no other alternatives. 
        It will be presumptuous on my part to define Hinduism here, but I refuse to restrict it to some opportunist ruffians. I refuse to buy the Hindutva brand sold by the brigade.



          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: Kshmendra Kaul 
          To: TaraPrakash ; reader-list at sarai.net 
          Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 4:25 AM
          Subject: Re: [Reader-list] gujrat election


          Dear Tara Prakash

          Intriguing comment by you. You wrote:

          """"'The fight in Gujarat was a fight between Hindus and Hindus if Hindus have won, Hindus have lost too. So your victory gets canceled. Evil wins and evil loses."""""

          It suggests rather states very blatantly that in your opinion whether the Hindu wins or loses, the Hindu is evil. Or at least in the specific case of Gujarat's electoral fights, according to you, whether the Hindus were on the winning side or the losing side, the Hindus are evil.

          Kshmendra Kaul




          TaraPrakash <taraprakash at gmail.com> wrote:
            Isn't it rather a defeat of Hindu forces? Ask Praveen Togadia. Ask the
            RSS members discontented with Modi. Ask the guy giving Modi "Brahmin ka
            shaap" for getting his son murdered. Will another Hindu terrorist Advani be
            happy with the results? Is Uma Bharati pseudo secular or pseudo communal for
            floating her own party against BJP?
            The fight in Gujarat was a fight between Hindus and Hindus if Hindus have
            won, Hindus have
            lost too. So your victory gets canceled. Evil wins and evil loses.
            May be you will be more careful before putting your foot in to your mouth
            next time.

            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: "Vedavati Jogi" 
            To: ; 
            Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 12:20 AM
            Subject: [Reader-list] gujrat election


            >
            >
            >
            >
            > whether it is a victory for bjp or for modi....its a useless question.
            > its a victory for hindus. and i hope it will be an eye opener for psudo
            > seculars!
            >
            > you can't always divide hindus & rule. thank you gujjubhais for showing
            > the world that when hindus unite, hindu vote bank too can be formed!
            >
            > vedavati
            >
            >
            > _________________________________________________________________
            > Tried the new MSN Messenger? Itâ?Ts cool! Download now.
            > http://messenger.msn.com/Download/Default.aspx?mkt=en-in
            > _________________________________________
            > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
            > Critiques & Collaborations
            > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
            > subscribe in the subject header.
            > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
            > List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>

            _________________________________________
            reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
            Critiques & Collaborations
            To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in the subject header.
            To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list 
            List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>



----------------------------------------------------------------------
          Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/attachments/20071228/8ce92b6a/attachment.html 


More information about the reader-list mailing list