[Reader-list] The Hindu on Tibet

Rohit Shetti rohitism at gmail.com
Mon Apr 14 12:08:16 IST 2008 

Dear Inder Salim,

That is indeed very well-said... I also feel that freedom struggles are
incomplete without the angle of environmental sustanance & cultural freedom
thrown in.. infact that ought to be more powerful than geo-political
concerns.

Rohit


On 4/14/08, inder salim <indersalim at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> dear Sonia
>
> " I think Kashmiris can
> learn something from them"
>
> thanks Sonia for endorsing what i actually want to be debated on the list.
> But this non-violent technique to carry forward struggle(s) is just
> the first step towards what i actually want.
>
> Social, psychological and Environmental issues  are  dear to me,  and
> therefore, i dont see any  struggle meaningful unless these  are
> clubbed with the freedom sturggles.  This new politics can really give
> direction to our future on  earth. This way we will know whether
> people of a particular area actually want a freedom or just want to
> unfurl a colour ful piece of cloth 'flag' ( parcham ) in the backyards
> or secretraits.
>
> So people of Tibet too need to know that the recent gains made by
> their non-violent methods of protesting are limited unless they learn
> to club the issues.
>
> When M.Yousuf said that someone can not be the SHO of a woman thana,
> and a woman beater at the same time, i thought of those Tibetians who
> kill Tigers and call themselves Buddhists at the same time. If they
> continue to do so, they simply dont deserve a free country.
>
> About Kashmir, i must add that the strong Sufi traditions of Kashmir
> are amply equpped with systems of thought that can be converted into
> new forms of protesting. That can really be creative. This way, an
> actual support can trickle into the valley. People like me,  who can
> not take a gun in his hands to kill even a bird, let alone a human
> being,  too can join the struggle. A new agenda can be fixed, that can
> be part of a globalized world order, re-emphasizing 'the oriental' as
> Edward Said might have loved to see....
>
> converting a violent organization into a non-vilent organiztion is too
> simplistic, but a significant one to march ahead for a new world
> politics, if there is one.
>
> I am optimistic.
>
> with love
> inder salim
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:33 AM, S. Jabbar <sonia.jabbar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The article was directed at the people of India who have singularly
> failed
> > to stop human rights violations in Kashmir.  It is extremely critical of
> the
> > Indian state's militaristic response. Nowhere in the article or indeed
> > anywhere in my writings have I supported the military action against
> > civilians in Kashmir.  If you choose to interpret the article as
> hypocrisy
> > I'd suggest you read it again. If you still choose to do so, it is your
> > prerogative, and I am saddened by what I see as your prejudiced reading.
> >
> > But as someone who admires Gandhi I take your criticism seriously and
> > somewhere I agree with you. I have tried since 1995 to work on Kashmir,
> to
> > somehow stop the killings, rapes, disappearances and torment of innocent
> > civilians whether by the Indian armed forces or the militants through my
> > writings and activism. In this I have singularly failed. All I have
> managed
> > to do in all these years is to generate a little debate and comfort a
> > handful of families.  In return I have received more than my share of
> love
> > and hospitality from the people of Jammu and Kashmir, a debt that I can
> > never repay.  It is this debt that makes me continue my work in Kashmir.
> >
> > Having said that, I'd like to draw your attention to a question I have
> for
> > you and to other young Kashmiris. I, as an "Indian" may have failed to
> help
> > people in Kashmir through the twenty devastating years of war, but what
> have
> > you done? I find the moral high ground you occupy just because you
> happen to
> > be born a Kashmiri unacceptable.
> >
> > I am reminded of the time when I could not go to Kashmir for a few
> months
> > because of Gujarat.  I was deeply involved in organising and
> coordinating
> > efforts of activists, lawyers and NGOs.  When I returned to Kashmir, a
> > prominent human rights lawyer accused me of forgetting Kashmir.  I
> explained
> > the Gujarat situation to him, described to him how we had worked day and
> > night to counter the monstrous actions of the Sangh Parivar, but in the
> end
> > he said, 'OK, OK, but you haven't done much for Kashmir.'  I asked him
> what
> > he had done for Gujarat and he fell silent.
> >
> > The point is I believe there cannot be an hierarchy of pain.  The pain
> of
> > the Kashmiri is not greater than the pain of a Sri Lankan or an Afghan
> or
> > indeed, a Tibetan. In this I find Rosa Luxembourg most instructive and I
> > will quote her in full:
> >
> > What do you want with this particular suffering of the Jews?  The poor
> > victims on the rubber plantations in Puntamayo, the negroes in Africa
> with
> > whose bodies the Europeans play a game of catch are just as near to
> me.  Do
> > you remember the words written on the work of the General Staff about
> > Trotta's campaign in the Kalahari Desert? "And the death rattles, the
> mad
> > cries of those dying of thirst, faded away into the sublime silence of
> > eternity."
> >
> > Oh this "sublime silence of eternity" in which so many screams have
> faded
> > away unheard.  It rings with me so strongly that I have no special
> corner of
> > my heart reserved for the ghetto.  I am at home wherever in the world
> there
> > are clouds, birds and human tears.
> >
> > ----
> >
> > Returning to the issue of what you call my hypocritical engagement with
> the
> > Tibet issue.  Instead of stopping me from doing so, I suggest you
> encourage
> > more people to engage with the Kashmir issue.  Let there be debate.  Let
> the
> > Indian government be shamed into repealing its draconian laws and
> punishing
> > those guilty of rights violations.  And I don't believe that it is
> > hypocritical for a Japanese to engage with Kashmir when his or her
> > government has as yet not apologised to China or for an American to do
> so
> > because of Iraq, or for a Kashmiri Muslim to speak up for the Tibetans
> > because of the Pandit exodus.
> >
> > The world is small.  You accuse me of nationalism and yet you want my
> > energies to be confined to the borders of my nation.  There are many
> > struggles I should have done more for, not just Kashmir.  I am deeply
> > disturbed by what the Indian state has done in the Northeast.  I believe
> > India's attitude here has been one of a colonial power, and yet I have
> not
> > had the time or energy to do more.  The same goes with Burma, as well as
> > Balochistan.
> >
> > The Tibetans are a small nation of 6.5 million people and yet there is
> > something about their non-violent struggle that has attracted millions
> of
> > people across the globe to come to their support.  I think Kashmiris can
> > learn something from them.
> >
> > If you are based in Delhi please join us.  The Tibetans have been camped
> in
> > Jantar Mantar for the past few weeks and every evening there is a candle
> > light vigil.  On the 17th we are planning a parallel peace run: the
> Torch
> > for Tibet.  Nothing would make me happier than to see a Kashmiri running
> > with us.
> >
> > With this I close my end of this particular debate, again for want of
> time.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/13/08 8:02 PM, "Wali Arifi" <waliarifi3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > *"This has got to stop. People cannot be killed every day because our
> > leaders
> > > have no idea on how to proceed with initiatives that they themselves
> > take. If
> > > Kashmir is indeed an inseparable part of India as we have been told
> > for more
> > > than 50 years, then we must as Indians rise, and in one voice say:
> > stop
> > > killing our own people."*
> >
> > The end lines of Ms Jabbar's piece sums it up and
> > > describes her position
> > about places like Kashmir. All the questions raised so
> > > far stand answered!
> >
> > Double standards of people like Ms Jabbar come out clear.
> > > For her, the
> > world's highest militarised area doesn't qualify as an occupation
> > > because
> > its the military of her own nation that she appears to be advising in
> > > her
> > piece.
> >
> > Hypocrisy... Is this?
> >
> > Best
> >
> >
> > On 4/12/08, S. Jabbar
> > > <sonia.jabbar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > FYI This is from the neo-Gandhian in 2001,
> > > published in the op-ed section
> > > in the Indian Express.
> > >
> > >
> > > Cease
> > > Firing!
> > >
> > > By Sonia Jabbar
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > After announcing one or the other step in
> > > Kashmir "in the right direction"
> > > the Indian State is in the habit of falling
> > > asleep with its head in the
> > > sand, hoping that if and when it wakes up things
> > > would have sorted
> > > themselves out‹somehow.  The Prime Minister's Ramzan Cease
> > > Fire announcement
> > > is the most recent example of this policy.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I was
> > > in Kashmir in the early days of the cease-fire and the relief and
> > > hope it
> > > promised amongst the Kashmiris was remarkable. There was a
> > > carnivalesque
> > > feeling in the air: shops alight and open until late, large
> > > crowds in the
> > > market places, mosques and shrines, feasting and revellry
> > > after the day's
> > > fast. Even hardened separatists heaved a sigh of relief and
> > > welcomed the
> > > Centre's move. Three months later things are back to normal:
> > > curfew,
> > > custodial killings, firing on demonstrations, civilian casualties.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Consider the events of the last few days: Jaleel Ahmed Shah was picked
> up> by
> > > the Special Operations Group (SOG, the counter-insurgency arm of the
> J&K
> > >
> > > Police) and the army from his residence in Haigam, Sopore, on the
> 13th. Two
> > >
> > > days later the people of Haigam were told that Shah had been killed in
> > >
> > > "retaliatory action" when he had ambushed an army/SOG patrol in the
> forest
> > >
> > > area of Juhama, Baramulla.  As it often happens, the police delayed in
> > >
> > > handing over Shah's dead body to his relatives. This prompted the
> residents
> > >
> > > of Haigam to lead a demonstration of an estimated 6,000 people onto
> the
> > >
> > > Srinagar-Baramulla highway, demanding Shah's body be handed over to
> his
> > >
> > > relatives. An officer leading an army convoy, on finding the road
> blocked by
> > >
> > > the protestors, ordered his men to open fire on the crowd. 5 civilians
> were
> > >
> > > killed, 30 were injured. Police sources say that the police was
> already
> > >
> > > present, persuading the crowd to leave when the army opened fire. One
> > >
> > > policeman was also injured in the firing. Of the two women killed, one
> was a
> > >
> > > first-year B.A. student.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The security forces claim that Jaleel Ahmed
> > > Shah was a dreaded district
> > > commander of the Harkat-ul Jehad-i- Islami
> > > (HUJI) and had masterminded
> > > several attacks on the army and on civilians.
> > > But this is in direct
> > > contradiction to their own claim that the HUJI has no
> > > presence in the
> > > Valley, but in the Jammu area.  Also contradicting the claim
> > > of Shah's
> > > affiliation to the HUJI is a statement by Yasin Malik who says
> > > that Shah was
> > > the Distict Secretary of the JKLF and had even participated in
> > > the blood
> > > donation camp recently organised by the JKLF for the victims of
> > > the Gujrat
> > > earthquake. The JKLF declared a unilateral cease-fire in 1994 and
> > > has since
> > > advocated a non-violent, secular, political struggle. Since the
> > > Indian State
> > > lifted the ban on the organisation last year it has a right,
> > > under law, to
> > > exist. Its workers and office bearers have the right to
> > > profess their
> > > ideology and engage in political activities.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > A day
> > > after the Haigam firing, workers of the JKLF organised a
> > > demonstration at
> > > Lal Chowk protesting the custodial killing of Shah and the
> > > 5 deaths at
> > > Haigam.  A plain clothed security man fired into the
> > > demonstration killing
> > > one young man immediately. Another is in hospital with
> > > a bullet in his head.
> > > Curfew has been clamped in Srinagar. The tremendous
> > > goodwill generated in
> > > the early days of the cease fire towards the Indian
> > > state stands to be lost
> > > unless immediate measures are taken to rectify the
> > > situation.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The
> > > Centre must not be tempted to retract the cease-fire in view of the
> > >
> > > escalation in violence. But an extension of the cease-fire would be
> > >
> > > meaningless if it were seen simply as an instrument to score brownie
> points
> > >
> > > against Pakistan in the international arena. It must demonstrate its
> > >
> > > sincerity on the ground in Kashmir *if* it genuinely wants peace in
> > >
> > > Kashmir.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > A high-ranking minister or official from New Delhi should
> > > visit the Valley
> > > and listen to the grievances of the people. In the decade
> > > long war in the
> > > Valley where thousands of innocent people have been killed,
> > > it is a rare
> > > occassion when a minister visits. And yet, Kashmiri Muslims
> > > have seen how
> > > the gruesome killings of 36 Sikhs of Chittisinghpora brought
> > > planeloads of
> > > concerned officials from the Centre.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The SOG/STF
> > > should be reined in. Fifteen of the twenty-three extrajudicial
> > > executions
> > > recorded since the cease-fire have been attributed to the
> > > SOG/STF. The
> > > granting of impunity to the security forces under the bogus
> > > claim that
> > > holding them accountable would somehow "demoralise the forces" is
> > >
> > > unacceptable to any self-respecting democracy.  Senior officers in the
> > >
> > > Police and Army while admitting to working under tremendous pressure
> have>
> > > stated often enough how they would welcome a more transparent system
> as it
> > >
> > > would discipline the forces. But finally, it should be recognised that
> > >
> > > abuses by the security forces will only stop when they are pulled out
> of the
> > >
> > > Valley. And that can only happen when a genuine peace gets a foothold
> in
> > >
> > > Kashmir.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > For a genuine peace to be established Kashmiris need to be
> > > treated like
> > > other citizens of this country with full democratic rights. If
> > > the Kar
> > > Sevaks were not shot at in Ayodhya and the Shiv Sainiks during their
> > > V-day
> > > celebrations, why should Kashmiris be shot at for protesting against
> > >
> > > killings of non-combatant Kashmiris?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Centre should recognise that
> > > the Kashmir issue has festered for over
> > > half a century because it did not
> > > allow any healthy opposition to grow and
> > > democratically challenge the
> > > governments that New Delhi foisted upon
> > > Kashmir. Opposition and protest are
> > > vital safety valves for any democracy.
> > > Plug them and you have pressure
> > > growing and exploding like it did in 1989
> > > when Kashmiri youth picked up the
> > > gun.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Opposition to the National Conference government and Farooq
> > > Abdullah is
> > > virtually non-existent in the Assembly. This is hardly a healthy
> > > political
> > > scenario. The only opposition rests outside the Assembly, within
> > > the
> > > Hurriyat Conference.  In such a situation the Centre needs to be a
> > > little
> > > less paranoid about the Hurriyat's miniscule pro-Pak element and
> > > engage with
> > > it seriously.  This would be the next logical step in the peace
> > > process.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Hurriyat had announced in early December its intentions
> > > to visit
> > > Pakistan to hold talks with the militant organisations, and set the
> > > date for
> > > their departure as January 15. The mandarins in the Home Ministry
> > > vacillated
> > > and continue to stall their initiative by not issuing passports‹
> > > a decision
> > > entirely uncalled for. Abdul Ghani Lone's brave statements
> > > against foreign
> > > militants on his last trip to Pakistan and the Hurriyat's
> > > transparent agenda
> > > for Pakistan should have convinced the Centre how
> > > necessary it is to allow
> > > the Hurriyat to travel without impediment.  The
> > > continued intransigence on
> > > the passport issue impresses no one, and only
> > > underscores the whimsical
> > > high-handedness of the Indian State.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The
> > > Valley is in shadow again today. Six families are bereaved. There will
> > > be
> > > six funerals. I have seen this scene played out hundreds of times:
> > > Mothers,
> > > grandmothers, children, uncles will be sitting around the bodies
> > > weeping;
> > > weeping for a boy or girl who was a student, a worker, a
> > > businessman.  He or
> > > she was just going to be married or just had a child, or
> > > there would be some
> > > little detail about this person that would make the
> > > whole thing terribly
> > > tragic. Afzal or Imran or Ghulam Mohammed was
> > > soft-spoken, I would be told,
> > > had never picked up the gun.  And yet, here he
> > > lies, cold, never to wake
> > > again.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This has got to stop. People cannot be killed every day because
> > > our
> > > leaders have no idea on how to proceed with initiatives that they
> > > themselves
> > > take. If Kashmir is indeed an inseparable part of India as we
> > > have been told
> > > for more than 50 years, then we must as Indians rise, and in
> > > one voice say:
> > > stop killing our own people.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/11/08 8:41 PM,
> > > "Wali Arifi" <waliarifi3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >  One would have hoped that this
> > > response was posted on the Sarai forum.
> > > These are no personal issues
> > > though...
> > >
> > > Now that Ms Sonia Jabbar wants a response to her work/writing
> > > about
> > > Kashmir, may I ask if she considers Kashmir a military occupation,
> > > just like
> > > Tibet, or a law and order issue most nationalist Indians like to
> > > beleive it
> > > is?
> > >
> > > Not that her readership and observance is not aware of Ms
> > > Jabbar's
> > > neo-Gandhian activism in Kashmir. Could Ms Jabbar also, for the
> > > benefit of
> > > Sarai subscribers, point out any published stand on what she
> > > believes
> > > Kashmir issue to be?
> > >
> > > And does she also have anything to say
> > > about Kashmir reportage by the
> > > likes of Praveen Swami and Barkha Dutt both
> > > of whom along with many others
> > > owe their careers as journalists to
> > > misrepresenting Kashmir.
> > >
> > > best
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/11/08, *sonia jabbar*
> > > <sonia.jabbar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Easy for you to accuse me of  enjoying 'an
> > > organic
> > > relationship with the powers that be.'  Easier to say I  observe
> > > criminal
> > > silence than to find out what I've said  and  respond intelligently
> > > and
> > > substantively to my writings and activism.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at
> > > 12:28 AM, Wali Arifi <waliarifi3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear all
> > >
> > > It is not
> > > clear why the signatories to the letter are agitated about the
> > > way
> > > The
> > > Hindu has dealt with the Tibet issue. The editorial in question
> > > actually
> > >
> > > reflects the newspaper's consistent outlook about many similar issues.
> > >
> > > The
> > > newspaper's well known Rural Editor simply chose to overlook recently
> > >
> > > exposed state terrorism by the CPI(M) government in Nandigram. Mr P
> > >
> > > Sainath,
> > > the interrogator of Indian social reality, in complete contrast to
> > > what he
> > > is known for, chose to remain silent about purging, massacre and
> > > onslaught
> > > of corporate world. All this in conformity with the newspaper's
> > > proximity
> > > to
> > > the so called CPI(M) ideology and the party.
> > >
> > > Similarly,
> > > The Hindu's "ace reporter" and its "Kashmir expert", Mr Praveen
> > > Swami,
> > > appears to have been left above any ethical or professional
> > > scrutiny
> > > - the
> > > right a newspaper is supposed to unequivocally reserve for itself
> > > and
> > > its
> > > readers. The newspaper willingly chooses to ignore how Swamiji has
> > > over
> > >
> > > time been turned into a dumping yard for its scrap book by the
> country's
> > >
> > > intelligence establishment. The ace journalist does not even seem to
> > >
> > > exercise the basic minimum professional duty of cross checking
> information
> > >
> > > dolled out to him by his intelligence handlers.
> > >
> > > For patient readers the
> > > link bellow provides just an example, the tip of
> > > the
> > > Swamiji iceberg.
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.thehindu.com/2008/04/04/stories/2008040458210100.htm
> > >
> > > While the
> > > ace reporter was being briefed for this particular report (I am
> > > taking the
> > > sweet liberty to imagine once like Swamiji so regularly does),
> > > his (and thus
> > > The Hindu's) trusted handlers forgot to check that the
> > > Hizbul
> > > Mujahideen
> > > (HM) ceasefire dates were off the mark only by three years.
> > > According to
> > > Swamiji, HM's July 2000 ceasefire was scripted by the group's
> > > ideologue in
> > > 2003!
> > >
> > > For a discerning reader, The Hindu cannot be disappointing in this
> > > regard.
> > > Be it Tibet, Kashmir, Nandigram or the issue of Northeast. In fact,
> > > its
> > > Kashmir reportage happens through the intelligence establishment with
> > > just
> > > tulip gardens from the ground. Or, may be the newspaper is mandated
> > > only
> > > to
> > > write about US imperialism.
> > >
> > > For the signatories of the letter
> > > to the newspaper, particularly Sonia
> > > Jabbar, Shashi Tharoor and Ramachandra
> > > Guha, who enjoy an organic
> > > relationship with the powers that be, it is easy
> > > to understand how they
> > > give
> > > themselves the moral right to talk about Tibet
> > > and choose to exercise
> > > criminal silence about what India has been doing in
> > > Northeast and Kashmir.
> > >
> > > Nationalism, lady and gentlemen, is quite a
> > > mandate!
> > >
> > > Best
> > > On 4/9/08, radhikarajen at vsnl.net <radhikarajen at vsnl.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I very much appreciate your concern and anguish, but it is
> > > wellknown
> > > fact
> > > > that our "cadres" always hail china and welcome them with
> > > painting red
> > > the
> > > > whole of the city like they did in 1962.The very fact
> > > that the line
> > > marked
> > > > as Mcmohan line as border between british india in
> > > 1945 after the end of
> > > > world war, even today remains unsurveyed, thanks to
> > > our cadre friends
> > > > engineering hindi-chini bhai bhai. It is not late even
> > > now to make a
> > > joint
> > > > survey and with dialogue end the border row and
> > > disputes with China,
> > > then
> > > > two nations, the developing economies of Asia,
> > > both India and China can
> > > have
> > > > honourable  interaction with all nations
> > > in the comity of nations, even
> > > US
> > > > would be thinking twice if our leaders
> > > think of the nation and its
> > > freedom
> > > > than kickbacks in N-deal for the
> > > first family.!
> > > > Regards.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "S.
> > > Jabbar" <sonia.jabbar at gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 5:44 pm
> > >
> > > > Subject: [Reader-list] The Hindu on Tibet
> > > > To: sarai list
> > > <reader-list at sarai.net>
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Letter to the Editor:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Hindu's bias in favour of the Chinese Government in its
> > > > > editorial
> > > on
> > > > > Tibet (March 28, 2008) is dismaying.  The reasons behind the
> recent
> > >
> > > > > demonstrations by Tibetans are transparent. You speak of sustained
> > > > >
> > > growth,omitting the fact that Han Chinese control the economy,
> > > > > Party
> > > and
> > > > > government. Impartial observers have documented the onslaught on
> > > >
> > > > naturalresources, the repression of Buddhism, the enforced
> > > > >
> > > denunciations of the
> > > > > Dalai Lama.
> > > > >
> > > > > The subjugation of Tibet is
> > > most evident in re-settlement policy.
> > > > > In 1952
> > > > > Chairman Mao
> > > complained that there were "hardly any Han in Tibet."
> > > > > By 1953
> > > > >
> > > there were 100,000 Chinese in the province of Qinghai, the renamed
> > > > >
> > > easternTibetan province of Amdo. In 1985 there were 2.5 million
> > > > > Chinese
> > > and 750,000
> > > > > Tibetans in Qinghai. By the 2000 census only 20% of
> > > Qinghai's
> > > > > population was
> > > > > Tibetan.
> > > > >
> > > > > This demographic
> > > engineering undermines the comparison you draw
> > > > > betweenTibet and Kashmir.
> > > Right-wing groups in India have long
> > > > > demanded the
> > > > > re-settlement of
> > > the Kashmir Valley. However, Article 370 disallows
> > > > > non-state subjects
> > > from buying land; and it is to allay Kashmiri
> > > > > anxietiesthat New Delhi
> > > has not granted autonomy or separate
> > > > > statehood for Ladakh and
> > > > >
> > > Jammu.
> > > > >
> > > > > Beijing's abusive denunciations of the Dalai Lama and its
> > >
> > > > > stonewalling of
> > > > > his proposals make it difficult to accept their
> > > sincerity. A just
> > > > > solution"within the framework of one China" is
> > > precisely what the
> > > > > Dalai Lama has
> > > > > pursued.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Hindu's
> > > wholesale reproduction of the official Chinese line on
> > > > > Tibetdoes it
> > > little credit.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sonia Jabbar
> > > > >
> > > Ramachandra Guha
> > > > > Mukul Kesavan
> > > > > Madhu Sarin
> > > > > Jyotirmaya
> > > Sharma
> > > > > Dilip Simeon
> > > > > Tenzin Sonam
> > > > > Shashi Tharoor
> > > > >
> > > _________________________________________
> > > > > reader-list: an open
> > > discussion list on media and the city.
> > > > > Critiques & Collaborations
> > > > >
> > > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> > > > >
> > > subscribe in the subject header.
> > > > > To unsubscribe:
> > > https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-
> > > > > list
> > > > > List archive:
> > > <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> > > >
> > > _________________________________________
> > > > reader-list: an open discussion
> > > list on media and the city.
> > > > Critiques & Collaborations
> > > > To subscribe:
> > > send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> > > > subscribe in the
> > > subject header.
> > > > To unsubscribe:
> > > https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > >
> > > > List archive:
> > > &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> > >
> > > _________________________________________
> > > reader-list: an open discussion
> > > list on media and the city.
> > > Critiques & Collaborations
> > > To subscribe: send
> > > an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> > > subscribe in the subject
> > > header.
> > > To unsubscribe:
> > > https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > >
> > > List archive:
> > > &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________
> > > __________________________
> > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and
> > > the city.
> > Critiques & Collaborations
> > To subscribe: send an email to
> > > reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in the subject header.
> > To
> > > unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > List
> > > archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________
> > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> > Critiques & Collaborations
> > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
> > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://indersalim.livejournal.com
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>

More information about the reader-list mailing list