[Reader-list] Apology for Mahmood Farooqui

[Kshmendra Kaul]

Dear Mahmood
 
I must apologise to you for the manner in which I had worded an earlier post.
 
Allow me to rephrase myself with the amendments placed in CAPITALS:
 
"""""""" Whether 'all press' is communal or not, you certainly SEEM TO BE. You are SEEMINGLY trying to instigate communal feelings by suggesting a communal slant.""""
 
Kshmendra
 

--- On Thu, 8/14/08, Kshmendra Kaul <kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Kshmendra Kaul <kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Reader-list] kashmir pictures
To: "sarai list" <reader-list at sarai.net>, "mahmood farooqui" <mahmood.farooqui at gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, August 14, 2008, 7:13 PM

Dear Mahmood
 
Whether 'all press' is communal or not, you certainly are. You are
trying to instigate communal feelings by suggesting a communal slant.
 
Times of India and Hindustan Times showed photograph of a hoodlum attacking a
policeman.
 
Inquilab showed the photograph of a person injured by police firing. If this
person was a part of the mob attempting to break the law and/or attacking the
police, then the injured person was a hoodlum injured by police firing.
 
What is communal in all of this? You are the one making it communal.
 
There was confrontation between the police and law breaking hoodlums in Kashmir
and in Jammu. What makes either situation communal?
 
Which is the 'communal' one between two kinds of photographs, one
where law enforcers are shown as being attacked by law breakers and another one
where law breakers are shown as having been hurt by law enforcers.
 
Perhaps if you had furnished the captions accompanying the photographs, one
could make a call on which newspaper showed a 'communal' tinge
 
Kshmendra
 
 
 
 
--- On Wed, 8/13/08, mahmood farooqui <mahmood.farooqui at gmail.com> wrote:

From: mahmood farooqui <mahmood.farooqui at gmail.com>
Subject: [Reader-list] kashmir pictures
To: "sarai list" <reader-list at sarai.net>, "Aamir
Bashir" <unattore1 at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 12:33 PM

Yesterday, nine Kashmiris were allegedly killed in the valley because of the
police firing.

Today, in the Bombay editions of the Times of India and Hindustan Times,
there is an identical image of a policeman being attacked by a Kashmiri.
There are no images of any Kashmiris being killed or attacked by the police.

The Urdu daily Inqilab, however, shows a Kashmiri injured by the police
firing.

Is it simplistic to say that all press is communal?

Is the poser itself simplistic?
_________________________________________
reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
Critiques & Collaborations
To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in
the subject header.
To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list 
List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>


  
_________________________________________
reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
Critiques & Collaborations
To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in
the subject header.
To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list 
List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>