[Reader-list] Kashmir Fact Finding
radhikarajen at vsnl.net
radhikarajen at vsnl.net
Wed Aug 27 19:22:35 IST 2008
Were you in II world war with hiter and his propaganda machine or did you get any transplant from those ?
----- Original Message -----
From: Khurram Parvez <khurramparvez at yahoo.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:03 pm
Subject: [Reader-list] Kashmir Fact Finding
To: SARAI <reader-list at sarai.net>
>
> People’s Union for Democratic Rights, Delhi
>
>
> PRESS RELEASE, 26th August 2008
>
> Findings of an Investigation Conducted From 22 to 25 August 2008
>
> A six-member team from four human rights organisations conducted
> an investigation into the “economic blockade” in Kashmir and its
> aftermath. The team toured the districts of Srinagar, Budgam,
> Baramulla, and Bandipora. The team spoke to victims of the
> violence and their families, people who were part of protests,
> doctors at the SMHS hospital, journalists, the Kashmir Chamber of
> Commerce, and office bearers of many social and political
> organisations. However, the fact finding was disrupted as the
> state announced an indefinite curfew from the morning of 24th
> August. The release also addresses the second round of curfew
> currently in force. The total loss of life during the two periods
> of curfew stands at over 35.
> The main findings of the team are summarized below:
>
> 1. Azaadi is the primary demand in Kashmir
> The team arrived in Srinagar on 22 August and witnessed the
> massive protest meeting at the Idgah grounds. People gathered
> there publicly declared their primary demand for azaadi (freedom)
> at the meeting venue and through numerous street processions in
> various streets of Srinagar on 22 and 23 August. During our
> interviews with individual families and with groups, people voiced
> the same demand. A wide range of social and political
> organisations have also reiterated this demand.
>
> 2. Use of curfew to create a confrontation
> Curfew was imposed from the evening of 11 August and again from
> the morning of 24 August. The first time it was imposed hours
> after the security forces opened fire at many places on an unarmed
> procession heading to the Muzaffarabad border killing at least __
> people. It was expected that people would come out in the
> following day to protest against the killings. Curfew thus became
> an instrument to prevent people from assembling and gave security
> forces the power to use force against unarmed protestors.
> The second time curfew was imposed with the express purpose of
> preventing the dharna at Lal Chowk. The previous gathering at
> Idgah, where this dharna was announced, had been peaceful.
> Therefore curfew became the means by which a confrontation was
> created, which could have been easily avoided. The clamping down
> on media and the brutal attacks on journalists happened while the
> team was still there. Arrests of leaders, raids of homes and
> intimidation of local residents by the army and CRPF are happening
> even now. On 24th itself, our team issued an appeal to the central
> government to lift the curfew to prevent loss of life.
>
> 3. Deliberate blockade of supplies and its indifferent handling.
> While our team has not investigated the happenings in the Jammu
> region, its impact on Kashmir has been confirmed through our
> interviews. Protests in Jammu, which started from early July, took
> a more violent turn from the beginning of August. This led to
> severe restriction on the movement of goods and people on the
> Srinagar-Jammu highway and even into Punjab. Records at the
> highway check points, as reported in the Economic Times (21.8.08),
> confirm the substantial lowering of goods traffic in July and its
> worsening in August. Shortages were created as a result: of oils
> and cooking gas in the rural areas, of cereals and medicines in
> the urban areas. Given the fears of Kashmiri transporters and
> drivers, the impact was far worse in traffic moving out of
> Kashmir. This has led to substantial losses for fruit growers as
> well as handicrafts and carpet manufacturers and transporters.
> Fruit could be found rotting at many places and handicraft
> manufacturers report
> cancellation of export orders for the ramazan season and fears
> for the Christmas season. The team was told that till 23rd August,
> 80 % of the trucks were not leaving the valley for fear of attacks
> and only some 15-20 trucks were able to carry the apples out of
> the valley after assurance of safe passage from the government.
> The loss—over 75% of the fruit are rotting in the Sopore mandi. In
> Seer Jagir, a village in Sopore tehsil, the team met small farmers
> with average land holding of 4-5 acres, which produces on an
> average 3000 boxes of apples per annum. The 30 farmers in this
> village reported that they have lost on an average Rs 2 lakh this
> season. Therefore, the total loss of this small village account to
> nearly 60 lakh. The government’s lackadaisical attitude in
> ensuring supplies and its attempt to deny the ‘blockade’ led to
> feeling of ill-will in Kashmir.
>
> 4. Firing incidents (11-14th August) were unprovoked and aimed to kill
> The team investigated 15 cases of deaths that occurred on account
> of firing by CRPF and JK police between 11 and 14 August. The
> actual death toll is estimated to be above 30. The findings show a
> clear pattern: (a) The firings were aimed to kill. This was
> evident from eye witness accounts which showed that the firings
> were indiscriminate and aimed directly at the crowd. At Paribal,
> near Bandipura town on 12th August the RR and JK police fired on
> the crowd from above the hill where the 15 RR camp is located. (b)
> A large number of deaths resulted from injuries in the abdomen,
> chest, head or upper or lower back. The same was confirmed by
> hospital records. (c) In some cases, as at Lasjen on 12 August,
> protesters were deceived into by an assurance of allowing peaceful
> procession and then resorting to firing. Three people were killed
> including one 50 year old woman and six others received bullet
> injuries.
>
> 5. Attacks on those Injured
> The total number of people injured in the period between 11 and 14
> August is not clearly established. However, at SMHS hospital
> alone, over 500 patients were admitted in the same period. The
> team met families and those injured and killed in the attacks. We
> were repeatedly told that the security forces never tried to reach
> the injured to hospital. Worse, vehicles carrying injured to
> hospital were routinely attacked. Hospital sources claim that a
> number of ambulances were attacked. The same is confirmed by news
> reports today and the health department has threatened to stop
> ambulance services given the injuries received by ambulance
> drivers. Our team was told that in Lasjen, even those carrying
> dead bodies back from the hospital were attacked on 12th August.
> Elsewhere, in Bandipora the same was reported. The van carrying
> Mehrajuddin Kakh, injured in the Bandipura killing on 12 August,
> was attacked by CRPF and STF at Parimpora. Not only were the occupants
> attacked, Mehrajuddin’s thigh injury was brutalized by twisting a
> lathi in it. He died the same night. Equally, Imran Ahmed Wani who
> was injured in the Bagi Mehtab firing on 12 August was
> deliberately refused ambulance service for nearly two hours. In
> fact, when he did get into one, it was attacked at Rambagh Pul. He
> was declared dead on arrival at the hospital.
>
> 6. Attack on the SMHS hospital, Srinagar
> What is unbelievable is the attack on SMHS Hospital on 11 and 12
> August successively. The SMHS hospital received the largest number
> of casualties. When doctors were trying to conduct emergency
> operations at break-neck speed in order to save lives, the
> Casualty was attacked with tear gas shells followed by firing live
> bullets. The firing was again repeated on 12 August. It is the
> dedication of doctors, paramedic staff, ambulance drivers and
> timely arranging of bandages, gauze and cotton by the medical
> representatives, at the risk of their own lives, that managed to
> save a large number of lives. The doctors also confirmed that the
> help received by the ordinary people in saving the lives of those
> injured was remarkable. People helped the medical staff in
> transporting the wounded to the OT, aided in tending treatment in
> the Casualty and arranged vans and ambulances to carry them to the
> different hospitals in the city and elsewhere.
>
> 7. Attacks on Funeral Processions
> Funeral processions were repeatedly attacked in many places as
> large numbers of people marched with the bier to the graveyards.
> The team was told that the funeral procession of Ishfaq Ahmed
> Kana, shot dead at Qamarwari Chowk, Srinagar on 11 August, to the
> Idgah Martyrs Memorial was attacked by the CRPF with lathis and
> rubber bullets. In Baghi Mahtab, Javed Ahmed Mir’s funeral
> procession was attacked and one person was killed in the firing.
> Other protest demonstrations protesting against the killings were
> also attacked. For instance, the protest demonstration following
> the shooting of Owais Majeed Zarga in Rainawari, Srinagar on 12th
> August was attacked by the Kashmir police stationed outside the
> office of the local MLA, Mhd Shahid. Two boys were injured in the
> firing.
>
> 8. Raids and Attacks on Residents:
> During the evening of 13 and 14 August, security forces engaged in
> an indiscriminate and large-scale attack on houses in localities
> close to the firings, thrashing people and smashing window panes.
> At Safakadal, Srinagar, residents showed how their houses and a
> nearby mosque were attacked by the CRPF. At Lasjen, JK police and
> CRPF personnel entered houses to thrash people. Relatives were
> forcibly prevented from accessing homes of deceased and women
> relatives at the house of Imtiaz Rahim, who died in the firing,
> showed us the marks of brutality at the hands of the security
> forces.
>
> 9. FIRs: Refusals and Distortions:
> In most cases, the families have not registered any FIRs against
> the security forces as they fear going to the police station or
> that it would invite further violence. Where families of those
> killed were able to go to police stations after many days, they
> found that FIRs were already lodged stating that the protestors
> attacked security forces who in turn were forced to open fire.
> When families tried to get their version recorded, the same was
> refused. Complaints are rejected. In the case of the Bagi Mahtab
> killings where the families of the deceased (Javed Ahmed Mir and
> Imran Ahmed Wani) were given a totally false version of the
> happenings in the FIR. When challenged, the police said that the
> families must come ten days later with 4 eye witnesses to
> corroborate their story. This refusal even to receive complaints
> is tantamount to making the security forces judges of their own
> actions.
> 10. Present Curfew and Developments
> On 24 August, Kashmir was greeted by indefinite curfew when it
> woke up in the morning. Within a few hours four media persons, on
> their way to office had been badly beaten up at Rambagh by the
> CRPF. The identity cards and passes issued during the last phase
> of curfew presented by the journalists were rejected. Mr Bilal,
> bureau chief of Sahara Samay was admitted to the Bone and Joints
> hospital and later to the SMHS hospital. By evening, security
> forces opened fire in Dal Gate area killing one person and
> critically injuring another. Homes of political leaders were
> raided and some arrested. In the rural areas, the army threatened
> local imams, nambardars and chowkidars on 24 August that they
> would be held responsible if people dared to join in the
> procession to Lal Chowk. Over the last two days, the curfew has
> lad to at least seven people being killed in firing by security
> forces and over 275 injured in various parts of Kashmir valley.
> Essential supplies to Srinagar city, such as medicines, water
> tankers and milk, have been blocked and this ‘blockade’ has been
> done at the instance of the CRPF. The entire control of land and
> order in Srinagar city has all been handed over to the CRPF and
> news reports have suggested that the local police have also been
> beaten by the CRPF.
> CONCLUSION
> The investigation team is of the opinion that the firing,
> brutality, loss of life was not only wholly avoidable but done
> deliberately. The disruption of road traffic to Kashmir needed to
> be recognized by the government and addressed. The resort to
> curfew after the firing on 11 August denied the people a right to
> protest and be heard. Additionally, the curfew provided the
> security forces the power to open fire with impunity. A number of
> extremely inhuman crimes were committed by the security forces by
> denying and obstructing medical aid to the injured, attacking the
> injured and most seriously by launching an attack on the SMHS
> hospital. No existing law in the country provides immunity to
> police and security forces for such crimes. The lack of any action
> against these forces even where the crimes are established by eye-
> witnesses and reported in newspapers, makes people lose whatever
> faith in the government that may have remained after decades of
> army rule.
> Despite these happenings, the people of Kashmir have shown
> exemplary restraint and ensured that all processions and public
> gatherings after the lifting of curfew remain wholly peaceful.
> This situation should have been utilized to initiate political
> dialogue instead of the visit by the National Security Advisor.
> The imposition of curfew to prevent another such pre-declared
> peaceful mass gathering can only be seen as an invitation to
> another bloody attack on protestors and serves as a message to the
> people of Kashmir that the Indian government would not tolerate
> peaceful and unarmed protest.
>
> WE DEMAND
> 1. Immediate lifting of the curfew and restoration of
> ample space to people to peaceably collect and voice their demands.
> 2. Criminal charges be registered against those
> responsible for attacks on injured people, ambulances and
> hospitals as well as widespread damage to houses.
> 3. Peoples complaints concerning arbitrary and
> indiscriminate use of fire by security forces be registered and
> the culprits brought to book.
> 4. Law and order duties be immediately restored to the
> police in Srinagar and all forces be made ot work ‘in aid of civil
> power’ as required by law.
> 5. The situation of the peaceful expression of peoples
> demands be utilized to initiate a political dialogue, the
> political establishment is duty-bound to do so when people in such
> large numbers are voicing these.
>
>
> Harish Dhawan
> Secretary, PUDR
> On behalf of
> People’s Democratic Forum (PDF), Karnataka
> Andhra Pradesh Civil Liberties Committee (APCLC), Andhra Pradesh
> Jammu Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society (JKCCS), Jammu and Kashmir
> People’s Union for Democratic Rights (PUDR), Delhi
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-
> list
> List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
More information about the reader-list
mailing list