[Reader-list] Pankaj Mishra on Kashmir in the New York Times
Shuddhabrata Sengupta
shuddha at gmail.com
Wed Aug 27 12:18:58 IST 2008
A Jihad Grows in Kashmir
by Pankaj Mishra,
The New York Times, 27th August, 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/27/opinion/27mishra.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
FOR more than a week now, hundreds of thousands of Muslims have
filled the streets of Srinagar, the capital of Indian-ruled Kashmir,
shouting "azadi" (freedom) and raising the green flag of Islam. These
demonstrations, the largest in nearly two decades, remind many of us
why in 2000 President Bill Clinton described Kashmir, the Himalayan
region claimed by both India and Pakistan, as "the most dangerous
place on earth."
Mr. Clinton sounded a bit hyperbolic back then. Dangerous, you wanted
to ask, to whom? Though more than a decade old, the anti-Indian
insurgency in Kashmir, which Pakistan's rogue intelligence agency had
infiltrated with jihadi terrorists, was not much known outside South
Asia. But then the Clinton administration had found itself compelled
to intervene in 1999 when India and Pakistan fought a limited but
brutal war near the so-called line of control that divides Indian
Kashmir from the Pakistani-held portion of the formerly independent
state. Pakistan's withdrawal of its soldiers from high peaks in
Indian Kashmir set off the series of destabilizing events that
culminated in Pervez Musharraf assuming power in a military coup.
After 9/11, Mr. Musharraf quickly became the Bush administration's
ally. Seen through the fog of the "war on terror" and the Indian
government's own cynical propaganda, the problem in Kashmir seemed
entirely to do with jihadist terrorists. President Musharraf could
even claim credit for fighting extremism by reducing his intelligence
service's commitment to jihad in Kashmir — indeed, he did help bring
down the level of violence, which has claimed an estimated 80,000 lives.
Since then Pakistan has developed its own troubles with Muslim
extremists. Conventional wisdom now has Pakistan down as the most
dangerous place on earth. Meanwhile, India is usually tagged as a
"rising superpower" or "capitalist success story" — clichés so
pervasive that they persuaded even so shrewd an observer as Fareed
Zakaria to claim in his new book "The Post-American World" that India
since 1997 has been "stable, peaceful and prosperous."
It is true that India's relations with Pakistan have improved lately.
But more than half a million Indian soldiers still pursue a few
thousand insurgents in Kashmir. While periodically holding bilateral
talks with Pakistan, India has taken for granted those most affected
by the so-called Kashmir dispute: the four million Kashmiri Muslims
who suffer every day the misery and degradation of a full-fledged
military occupation.
The Indian government's insistence that peace is spreading in Kashmir
is at odds with a report by Human Rights Watch in 2006 that described
a steady pattern of arbitrary arrest, torture and extrajudicial
execution by Indian security forces — excesses that make the events
at Abu Ghraib seem like a case of high spirits. A survey by Doctors
Without Borders in 2005 found that Muslim women in Kashmir, prey to
the Indian troops and paramilitaries, suffered some of the most
pervasive sexual violence in the world.
Over the last two decades, most ordinary Kashmiri Muslims have
wavered between active insurrection and sullen rage. They fear,
justifiably or not, the possibility of Israeli-style settlements by
Hindus; reports two months ago of a government move to grant 92 acres
of Kashmiri land to a Hindu religious group are what provoked the
younger generation into the public defiance expressed of late.
As always, the turmoil in Kashmir heartens extremists in both India
and Pakistan. India has recently suffered a series of terrorist
bombings, allegedly by radicals among its Muslim minority. Hindu
nationalists have already formed an economic blockade of the Kashmir
Valley — an attempt to punish seditious Muslims and to gin up votes
in next year's general elections. In Pakistan, where weak civilian
governments in the past sought to score populist points by stirring
up the emotional issue of Kashmir, the intelligence service can only
be gratified by another opportunity to synergize its jihads in
Kashmir and Afghanistan.
What of the Kashmiris themselves, who have repeatedly found
themselves reduced to pawns in the geopolitical games and domestic
politics of their neighbors? In 1989 and '90, when few Kashmiris had
heard of Osama bin Laden, hundreds of thousands of Muslims buoyed by
popular revolutions in Eastern Europe regularly petitioned the United
Nations office in Srinagar, hoping to raise the world's sympathy for
their cause. Indian troops responded by firing into many of these
largely peaceful demonstrations, killing hundreds of people and
provoking many young Kashmiris to take to arms and embrace radical
Islam.
A new generation of politicized Kashmiris has now risen; the world is
again likely to ignore them — until some of them turn into terrorists
with Qaeda links. It is up to the Indian government to reckon
honestly with Kashmiri aspirations for a life without constant fear
and humiliation. Some first steps are obvious: to severely cut the
numbers of troops in Kashmir; to lift the economic blockade on the
Kashmir Valley; and to allow Kashmiris to trade freely across the
line of control with Pakistan.
India's record of pitiless intransigence does not inspire much hope
that it will take these necessary steps toward the final and
comprehensive resolution of Kashmir's long-disputed status. In fact,
an indefinite curfew has already been imposed and Indian troops have
again killed dozens of demonstrators. But a brutal suppression of the
nonviolent protests will continue to radicalize a new generation of
Muslims and engender a fresh cycle of violence, rendering Kashmir
even more dangerous — and not just to South Asia this time.
Pankaj Mishra is the author, most recently, of "Temptations of the
West: How to Be Modern in India, Pakistan, Tibet and Beyond."
Shuddhabrata Sengupta
shuddha at gmail.com
More information about the reader-list
mailing list