[Reader-list] Aman Sethi on Gajar Matar

[Aman Sethi]

Cross posted on www.kafila.org

This is something that i have been thinking of ever since Chomsky et
all brought out their series of letters on Nandigram, left unity etc,
shuddha's post on Daniel Baremboim and now Tariq Ali on Why he will
not participate in Turin Book Fair.  At such points, i imagine the
writer of the letter in an almost kung-fu posture - balanced on one
foot, maybe raised on one toe to make the stance more complete,  the
other leg bent at the knee, hands in classic double punch pose.  The
moment of "taking a stand", defining his/her stance.

I do not doubt the intentions of those who take stances - its
important that people do take stances on things.  What i am interested
is public act of taking stance.  I suppose when our kung-fu fighter
takes stance, s/he assumes that s/he is a "somebody" - that the taking
stance has some public value - that people actually care. Could we say
that the act of taking stands is often an attempt to remain alive and
relevant in increasingly fast paced debates that span countries,
cultures and regions?

Tariq Ali could have written about why everyone should boycott the
Turin Book Fair - Why the Turin Book Fair committee should be
condemned - I would have gladly condemned and boycotted.  In fact I
had already decided not to go to the Turin Book Fair well before Tariq
did, for two very good reasons:

a) I wasnt invited; and
b) I can't afford the air fare.

However, Tariq chose to tell us why "he" is not going. So its no
longer about Turin, its about Tariq.

Maybe Tariq and Noam get up every morning and scan through the papers
at light speed - selecting events that they will attend and boycott,
endorse and disown; looking at candidates in rainbow revolutions
across central asia and eastern europe; speaking out, hitting out, and
talking up; emancipating, commiserating, condoling and supporting by
simply writing about why they will not go to sistine chapel, shop at
Walmart, wear nikes or feed animals in the delhi zoo (because its
against zoo rules of course).
Maybe Noam slaps his forehead as he thinks "Damn that Tariq, he has
rejected the invitation to the weekly meeting of the Siliguri Gram
Panchayat because they are parochial, narrow minded and only speak in
bengali.  I wasnt even invited."

And Tariq silently curses Noam for taking a stand on the Cynical
Supporters of Mass Hypnosis before he even knew they existed.
Perhaps they have secretaries who provide them with a list every
morning - a sheaf of cuttings, a zip folder of revolving revolutions.
Maybe they actually covertly set up organisations and institutions
only to take stands on them.

I propose we all come up with lists and stands.  I shall take the
plunge by declaring that I shall not eat Gajar Matar ki Subzi with
Ghee wali roti- because its yucky, fattening and the red and green
represents an unholy alliance of the communists and the green
movement.

Come on guys take your stances, I'll be the crouching tiger, you can
be the hidden dragons.
Best
A.





On Feb 11, 2008 2:05 AM, OISHIK SIRCAR <oishiksircar at gmail.com> wrote:
>  Why I Will Not Participate in the Turin Book Fair
> by TARIQ ALI
>
> When I agreed to participate in the Turin Book Fair, which I have
> done before, I had no idea that the 'guest of honour' was Israel and
> its 60th birthday. But this is also the 60th anniversary of what the
> Palestinian call the 'nakba'the disaster that befell them that year,
> when they were expelled from their villages, some killed, women raped
> by the settlers. These facts are no longer disputed. So why did the
> Turin Book Fair not invite Palestinians in equal numbers? 30 Israeli
> writers and 30 Palestinian writers (and I promise you they exist and
> are very fine poets and novelists) might have been seen as a positive
> and peaceful gesture and a positive debate might have taken place. A
> literary version of Daniel Barenboim's Diwan Orchestra, half-Israeli,
> half-Palestinian. Such a move would have brought people together, but
> no. The cultural commissars know best. I have argued vigorously with
> some of the Israeli writers visiting the fair on other occasions and
> would have happily done the same again if conditions had been
> different. What they decided to do is an ugly provocation.
>
> http://www.counterpunch.org/tariq02052008.html
>
> --
> OISHIK SIRCAR
>
> Scholar in Women's Rights
> Faculty of Law, University of Toronto
>
> 60 Harbord Street
> Room 016 B
> Toronto, ON M5S 3L1
>
> oishiksircar at gmail.com
> oishik.sircar at utoronto.ca
>
> 416.876.7926
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>