[Reader-list] Fwd: The true face of some of the clergies., in all faiths.

[Rajen Uppinangadi]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rajen Uppinangadi <rajen882uppinangadi at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: The true face of some of the clergies., in all faiths.
To: kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com


Dear Sir,

 where have I said that you have said or posted the quoted words, I own
them, I posted them, I mean these thoughts as correct.
As to question of ethics, what ethics is that to hide behind the god's work
when some one is as humane in his physical need, but the issue becomes
ethical and moral when the supposed to be pious, ascetics indulge in carnal
activities, which they are supposed to be abstaining.!

Regards.

Rajen.


On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Kshmendra Kaul <kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com>wrote:

>  Dear Rajen
>
> It is unethical to ascribe to another person such words or positions that
> have not been articulated by that person.
>
> You have done exactly that. It is disgusting.
>
> Please tell me where it is that I have said """"that all those who are
> engaged in "gods' work" are not in need of sensuous plesures for their
> bodies."""""
>
> Kshmendra
>
> --- On *Tue, 4/14/09, Rajen Uppinangadi <rajen882uppinangadi at gmail.com>*wrote:
>
> From: Rajen Uppinangadi <rajen882uppinangadi at gmail.com>
> Subject: The true face of some of the clergies., in all faiths.
> To: kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com
> Cc: reader-list at sarai.net
> Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 3:51 PM
>
>
> Sir,
> how do you say that all those who are engaged in " gods' work " are not in
> need of sensuous plesures for their bodies.?
>
>  There are enough evidence and hard facts to show that those in this sphere
> of spirituality are as good or bad as ordinary men and women when it comes
> to the basic needs of the body.
>
> Regards.
> Rajen.
>
>
>