[Reader-list] 'Report based on SIT findings'

[Aditya Raj Kaul]

Dear Rakeshji and Anupamji,

I'm also no authority on legal cases. Dhananjay as far as I know has been
covering Supreme Court since last so many years and has a very good track
record. He won't do a story and stand by it; just like that. There needs to
be a solid proof for it and he cannot make the entire report public for
obvious reasons. The SC might just hold this has an act against it.
Dhananjay did his part has a journalist brilliantly. You may agree or
disagree his report; that is your take. For me, I as well support his
report.

There are hundreds of 'allegations' made by so called activist Teesta and
her chamchas against many politicians. What proof does she have? Apart from
the hired and brainwashed witnesses. Even Teesta hasn'r provided any solid
proof for this SIT report to be wrong or framed or anything false. She has
just uttered some ramblings in a rejoinder issued to press; which doesn't
say her part too boldly.

The report will be out soon hopefully and I hope your doubts would be
claered.

thanks

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:47 PM, anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com>wrote:

> since when above mentioned author is an authority over the supreme court?
> is
> he speaking for R.K Raghavan. since when and how? where's the report??
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4/19/09, Aditya Raj Kaul <kauladityaraj at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dhananjay Mahapatra has explained it all here; particularly for some
> > friends
> > here who were already celebrating for scoring points over TOI..Hope the
> > wine
> > glasses friends. One cannot just so easily rubbish the truth..
> >
> > I didn't comment on the report of lies by CJP for this very reason the
> day
> > before.
> >
> > The lies of Teesta Setalvad have been exposed..Quite unfortunate what she
> > did maybe just for publicity or a few crisp notes. Lets hope some action
> is
> > taken against her. 'coz we know how many more so called mirror image
> copies
> > of Teesta would come up to scream against Judiciary and our great
> country.
> > So easily they can be fooled. It is for everyone to see.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 4:22 PM, anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > The report is yet to come out in Public. the idea of highlighting some
> of
> > > the contents from the report while not looking at the report as whole,
> so
> > > that it can be contexualised is a mistake often made by several media
> > > houses. I think we are falling for that same trap. Let the report be
> made
> > > public.
> > >
> > > On 4/19/09, Rakesh Iyer <rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear all
> > > >
> > > > Going ahead by such reports, I probably believe Mr. R.K.Raghavan
> > himself
> > > > should come out with the report in public, or the SC should declare
> an
> > > > order
> > > > to make it public. That can be helpful in deciding whether (at least
> on
> > > my
> > > > side) whether the report actually says it or not.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Rakesh
> > > > _________________________________________
> > > > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> > > > Critiques & Collaborations
> > > > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> > > > subscribe in the subject header.
> > > > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > > > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> > > _________________________________________
> > > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> > > Critiques & Collaborations
> > > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> > > subscribe in the subject header.
> > > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Aditya Raj Kaul
> >
> > Freelance Correspondent, The Times of India
> > Cell -  +91-9873297834
> >
> > Blog: http://activistsdiary.blogspot.com/
> > _________________________________________
> > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> > Critiques & Collaborations
> > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> > subscribe in the subject header.
> > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>



-- 
Aditya Raj Kaul