[Reader-list] Who dominates / owns the Media in India?

[Kshmendra Kaul]

Dear Anupam
 
Thank you for putting a perspective on the issue.
 
Fully agree with your words "if someone can prove that brahminical understanding has something to do with the range of opinions that we encounter everyday through various
channels, then it becomes really interesting."
 
Kshmendra

--- On Tue, 4/21/09, anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com> wrote:

From: anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Reader-list] Who dominates / owns the Media in India?
To: "sarai list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2009, 3:02 PM

It is true that there is a brahminical domination in media in terms of
number people from such and such caste. However, diversity of the opinions
raised by various media houses it just proves caste or religion doesn't
really matter. what matters for most of the media personnel is a good
package, some kind of exposure, meeting people, exchanging information and
writings.

however, if someone can prove that brahminical understanding has something
to do with the range of opinions that we encounter everyday through various
channels, then it becomes really interesting. but most of it would commit
the fallacy of accident.

thanks- anupam


On 4/21/09, Kshmendra Kaul <kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> That the Media in India (in part or with overwhelming influence) is
> dominated by the "upper caste" is not the only opinion about it.
>
> Many or most of the List members might have come across two interesting
> emails that have been circulating for quite some time that claim to tell
you
> the 'real truth' about the Media in India:
>
> 1. One such Email details for you the ownership of almost all the
prominent
> Indian Media Houses, seeking to establish that it is owned/controlled by
> either the Leftists or the Islamists or the Christianists.
>
> 2. The second such Email takes you on a journey of not only the ownership
> of the Media Houses but also how the prominent personalities in Media,
> Politics and Bueraucracy are directly  or indirectly related/linked to
each
> other and therefore collectively excercise a vice like grip.
>
> What interests me is the references that are made to "upper
caste"
> domination of the Media. It is also sometimes called "Brahmanical
> domination'.
>
> - Is it the "Brahmanical and/or upper caste domination" of
Hindus?
>
> - Is this "Brahmanical and/or upper caste domination" just a
metaphor that
> might equally apply to Hindus, Muslims, Christians etc or might apply to
> Economic Caste Divisions?
>
> Kshmendra
>
>
>
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
_________________________________________
reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
Critiques & Collaborations
To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in
the subject header.
To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list 
List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>