[Reader-list] BOYCOTT SECTARIAN AGENDAS

[taraprakash]

Dear Anupam and all. I am not the moderator but would still like to chime 
in. I understand that Monika is pretty busy and all of must appreciate the 
hard task it takes to run and sustain such a high traffick list. I'd like to 
remind that the list is not moderated in the real sense of the word. Anybody 
is allowed to boycott an agenda or all the agendas if they wish so. The 
option of using the delete  key on your computer or using message filters 
have been often suggested earlier here. So boycott anyone, anything you like 
but writing 3 4 messages just to reitterate do not help anyone.


Thanks


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "anupam chakravartty" <c.anupam at gmail.com>
To: "sarai list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Reader-list] BOYCOTT SECTARIAN AGENDAS


> Dear Rajen
> You can go on and be sectarian. The moderator in this reader's list doesnt
> seem to have a problem. And i respect your democratic rights sir that the
> constitution guarantees you. I am just calling for a boycott of such
> agendas.
> I would rather prefer a keyboard or a pen than a sword. Here's an 
> assurance
> to you, the more you keep on discussing your sectarian agendas here I will
> keep on presenting more issues which will be contrary to your claims. Take
> my word for that.
> Best wishes
> Anupam
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Rajendra Bhat Uppinangadi <
> rajen786uppinangady at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> sword is having both sides sharp.Your thoughts apply to all of us, as we
>> post.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rajen.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:05 PM, anupam chakravartty 
>> <c.anupam at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Rajen
>>> why are u pointing people, naming them? has anybody named you rajen. i
>>> guess
>>> they (as in Taha and Javed) speak of it because you keep on questioning
>>> them
>>> pinpointing them all the time, makign generic statements against a
>>> community
>>> is something that you guys keep doing. i will never forget what you said
>>> to
>>> meera rizvi (your surname suggest). first clean up your act then point 
>>> out
>>> others
>>> -anupam
>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Rajendra Bhat Uppinangadi <
>>> rajen786uppinangady at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Dear Anupam jee,
>>> >     who owns the hindu religion, it i universal way of life, so also 
>>> > the
>>> > islam, but why a taha, a javed speak for it, do they own islam.?If any
>>> of us
>>> > talk of ills our seculars have ready question that we do not speak for
>>> > hindu, but they join to defend a husain for his right to express art 
>>> > in
>>> > deities in his style, but no right to art for his own faith.? Art is
>>> > heartless when it is just art, but only commerce.
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Rajen.
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:40 PM, anupam chakravartty <
>>> c.anupam at gmail.com>wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Dear Rajen,
>>> >> My position has been same against all kinds of religious extremism.
>>> along
>>> >> with several other list members have been opposed to these issues. if 
>>> >> u
>>> >> can
>>> >> show me one instance which according to you contradicts my earlier
>>> >> position,
>>> >> then i would like withdraw this boycott call from my side. I wish to
>>> argue
>>> >> no more on this. i know you do not own hindu religion so my advice is
>>> that
>>> >> u
>>> >> should assuming this self styled of this religion and criticise 
>>> >> others.
>>> i
>>> >> do
>>> >> not expect a change of heart from u but in case if that happens it is
>>> also
>>> >> welcome.
>>> >> - best wishes
>>> >> anupam
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Rakesh Iyer <rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Dear all
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I just read a story of the Panchatantra, and it seems to resonate
>>> with
>>> >> what
>>> >> > one of my friends told yesterday: 'People change, they do, but 
>>> >> > don't
>>> >> force
>>> >> > them to change. They take it at their ego'
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Here's hoping for that change one day from Murali ji, Rajen ji, and
>>> >> others
>>> >> > of their like. And no more replies asking them to change or
>>> criticizing
>>> >> > them.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Regards
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Rakesh
>>> >> >
>>> >> _________________________________________
>>> >> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
>>> >> Critiques & Collaborations
>>> >> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>>> >> subscribe in the subject header.
>>> >> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>>> >> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Rajen.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> _________________________________________
>>> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
>>> Critiques & Collaborations
>>> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>>> subscribe in the subject header.
>>> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>>> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rajen.
>>
>>
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with 
> subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>