[Reader-list] RTF (Right to Food) Articles - 4

Rakesh Iyer rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com
Sun Aug 2 12:52:20 IST 2009


         INDIA  <http://www.indiatogether.org/>  TOGETHER     Sun 02 Aug
2009      The news in proportion.
NEWSLETTER<http://www.indiatogether.org/cgi-bin/mojo/mojo.cgi>
DIGITAL
EDITION <http://www.indiatogether.org/diged/>   PLEASE
CONTRIBUTE<http://www.indiatogether.org/support/contribute.htm>
<http://www.indiatogether.org/diged/>     HOME<http://www.indiatogether.org/>
OPINIONS <http://www.indiatogether.org/opinions/>
*INTERACT*<http://www.indiatogether.org/interact/>
* * *ABOUT US* <http://www.indiatogether.org/main/we.htm> * *
SUPPORT<http://www.indiatogether.org/support/home.php>
*SEARCH* <http://www.indiatogether.org/main/search.htm> * *
OP-ED<http://www.indiatogether.org/opinions/>   [image:
Opinions] <http://www.indiatogether.org/opinions/>
Opinions<http://www.indiatogether.org/opinions/>
Editorials <http://www.indiatogether.org/opinions/edits/>
Guests<http://www.indiatogether.org/opinions/guest/>
Interviews <http://www.indiatogether.org/interviews/>
Talks<http://www.indiatogether.org/opinions/talks/>
<http://www.indiatogether.org/rss/feeds.htm>
 RSS Feeds  <http://www.indiatogether.org/rss/feeds.htm>
<http://www.facebook.com/pages/India-Together/178295145047>
  SERVICES
Advertise<http://www.indiatogether.org/main/advertise.htm>   Contact
Us <http://www.indiatogether.org/input/comments.htm>
Newsletter<http://www.indiatogether.org/cgi-bin/mojo/mojo.cgi>
Submit <http://www.indiatogether.org/main/submit.htm>

 OPINION: FOOD SECURITY
* Food for all? Not through the NFSA. *
 The National Food Security Act proposes to lower ration prices, but also
reduce the quantity of grain that is given to each family. Devinder
Sharma suggests
a Zero Hunger programme instead.
  <http://www.indiatogether.org/support/home.php>
     •  Write the
author<hunger55 at gmail.com,%20editors at indiatogether.org?subject=Feedback:%20Food%20for%20all?%20Not%20through%20the%20NFSA.>
  •  Devinder Sharma <http://www.indiatogether.org/opinions/dsharma/>
  •  Food security <http://www.indiatogether.org/poverty/foodsec.htm>
  •  Send to a friend <http://www.indiatogether.org/php/sendform.php>
  •  Printer friendly
version<http://www.indiatogether.org/cgi-bin/tools/pfriend.cgi>
*17 July 2009* - When Atal Bihari Vajpayee for the first time unfurled the
national flag from the ramparts of the Red Fort in New Delhi, he promised to
turn the infamous Kalahandi hunger belt in western Orissa into a food bowl.
If only Vajpayee had made a serious attempt to wipe out hunger from
Kalahandi, and follow it up with a nationwide programme to feed the hungry
millions, the BJP wouldn't have been in a pitiable condition it now finds
itself in.

 And when President Pratibha Patil reiterated the government's resolve to
bring in a National Food Security Act in a bid to provide every hungry
family with 25 kg of foodgrains priced at Rs.3 a kilo, I certainly felt
excited. After all, 62 years after Independence, the government finally
makes a promise to feed the hungry nation. For the 320 million who are
officially categorised as hungry, nothing could be more heartening. And for
another 600 million, who are able to spend less than Rs.20 a day, there
appeared to be some hope. And with the new government barely in the saddle,
mandarins in the Food and Agriculture Ministry and in the Planning
Commission have swung into action, working overtime to give shape to the
promise made by Congress in its election manifesto.

 But if what I read in the newspapers is any indication, I now have all the
reasons to be worried, rather than excited. If the early signs continue,
there will be little hope for the hungry; instead they will continue to live
and die in hunger.

What pains me is to learn that even the Right to Food campaign, which has
fought several battles to ensure that food reaches the poor, is not thinking
beyond the PDS to address the real causes of hunger. There is no reason for
the civil society to shy away from the onerous task by saying that we have
to only take care of entitlements. I can understand the government trying to
say so, but that a section of the civil society is also trying to behave
like the government is something that does not auger well for the poor and
hungry.

*Modelled on failure*

 Home to the world's largest hungry population, India has a record on hunger
that is worse than that of nearly 25 sub-Saharan African countries. India is
ranked 66th among 88 vulnerable countries in the Global Hunger Index
prepared by the International Food Policy Research institute, and none of
its States is categorised under 'low hunger' or 'moderate hunger category'.
And let us not forget, the abysmally low ranking of India in the Global
Hunger Index is despite the PDS. The scheme caters to 65 million
families *below
the poverty line* (BPL) and 115 million other families *above the poverty
line* (APL), and is supposed to act as a safety net for the vulnerable
sections of our society.


If the PDS had been even partially effective, there should have been no
reason for Punjab to be ranked below Gabon, Honduras and Vietnam.


  •  Starvation persists in
Orissa<http://www.indiatogether.org/2008/jul/pov-starve.htm>
  •  Hunger affects
attendance<http://www.indiatogether.org/2007/mar/edu-upmdm.htm>
   If you consider each family to comprise on average five persons, the PDS
- on paper - meets the food requirement of 900 million people. If this is
true, I see no reason why the country should have the largest population of
hungry in the world. If the PDS had been even partially effective, there
should have been no reason for Punjab - and for that matter Kerala, the best
performing States in terms of hunger - to be ranked below Gabon, Honduras
and Vietnam. Extending the same failed PDS to more families, or introducing
a revamped PDS is therefore unlikely to make any meaningful difference to
the plight of the hungry and malnourished.

 But this is precisely what the new National Food Security Act (NFSA)
proposes to do. Modelled along the lines of the National Rural Employment
Guarantee Scheme, the Act does not see beyond the 'rights' of the poor, and
is more or less blind to whether these rights are being protected by
government schemes. The success of the NREGS itself is still debatable; we
all know is mired in corruption and large-scale siphoning-off of funds
intended for the unemployed poor. But that has not stopped the NFSA from
being drawn on more or less on the same pattern.

 On the price and quantity fronts too, the proposal is weak. At present, the
government provides 35 kg of food grains, including wheat and rice, to 65.2
million families classified as living *below the poverty line* (BPL). These
subsidised rations are made available at a price of Rs 4.15 per kg for wheat
and Rs 5.65 per kg for rice. For the 24.3 million families classified under
the Antyodya scheme (also part of the BPL category), the price of these
grains is further reduced to Rs.2 for wheat and Rs.3 for rice. Thus, what
the NFSA proposes is to provide the grains at an even lower price than in
the past, but *also in the process reduce the quantity of grain that is
given through the subsidy*.

 By reducing the quantum of grains given, the National Food Security Act
would therefore entail less financial burden on the government by an
estimated Rs.5000 crores. And the food requirement would be drastically
reduced from the existing 27 million tonnes to about 20 million tonnes, and
the annual subsidy outgo would also be lowered. It surely is a win-win
situation for the government. But how is this going to make an already
underfed people able to eat more? That goal, it now appears, will remain a
dream.

*Zero Hunger*

 Feeding the vulnerable sections, and that too in a sustained manner on
long-term basis, is only possible if the government evolves what I call a
Zero Hunger programme. I suggest a 5-point programme to ensure Zero Hunger:

   -

   Revive agriculture on the lines of sustainability, by restoring soil
   health and the natural resource base by bringing in low-external-input,
   sustainable farming practices.
   -

   Provide farmers with a fixed monthly income, incorporating the minimum
   support price. For the poorest of the poor households receiving
   micro-finance, ensure that the interest rate is reduced from the existing
   18-48 per cent to a maximum of 4 per cent.
   -

   Disband PDS except for food entitlements for the Antyodya families.
   Replace this with Foodgrain Banks at the village level on the lines of the
   traditional gola system of food security still existing in Bihar and east
   India.
   -

   Export of foodgrains should be allowed only when the country's total
   population is adequately fed.
   -

   International trade, including Free Trade Agreements, should not be
   allowed to play havoc with domestic agriculture and food security.

  All of this is possible, provided the political leadership demonstrates a
vision to redesign agriculture, food processing, rural development,
international trade and food security in an integrated manner. *⊕*

 *Devinder Sharma* <http://www.indiatogether.org/opinions/dsharma/>
17 Jul 2009

 * Devinder Sharma is a food and trade policy analyst. He also chairs the
New Delhi-based Forum for Biotechnology & Food Security. *
   <http://www.indiatogether.org/php/sendform.php>
<http://www.indiatogether.org/support/>

  •  Write the author<hunger55 at gmail.com,%20editors at indiatogether.org?subject=Feedback:%20Food%20for%20all?%20Not%20through%20the%20NFSA.>
  •  Post a comment on this
article<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/dsh-nfsa.htm#postnew>
  •  Devinder Sharma <http://www.indiatogether.org/opinions/dsharma/>
  •  Food security <http://www.indiatogether.org/poverty/foodsec.htm>
  •  Reprint permissions <http://www.indiatogether.org/main/repub.htm>

  *Comments* (2)


   - Posted by Srinivasa Ravuri <chakrawarthy at gmail.com>,

   Who pays for Food subsidy ?

   Ever since the (re)-introduction of the Rs. 2 kg-(that too slightly or
   the so called partially edible rice!) in some states, the price of fine-rice
   has shot-up to Rs. 40-a kilo. So who is paying for the subsidy?---not
   ceratinly the govt.


   - Posted by Nilima Basu <iacrindia at yahoo.com>,

   I appreciated atleast 3 recommendations.1)fixed income for farmers2)4%
   interest for those BPL,who are receiving micro-finance 3) Export of food
   grains only after population is adequately fed.

  ------------------------------
 *Post a comment*
Note: Your comment will appear within 24 hours unless found inappropriate
(spam, netabuse). *See
policy*<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/dsh-nfsa.htm#>

   Name:


Email Address:


URL:


 *Note*: If you do not wish to post a public comment here and instead want
to write a letter to the author directly, use the Write the
author<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/dsh-nfsa.htm#wta>link
that follows the author's byline at the end of the article.



Remember personal info?
YesNo

Letter:


For verification, please enter the security code you see below




 *View posted letters<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/dsh-nfsa.htm#already>
* (2)
Note: Your post will appear within 24 hours unless found inappropriate
(spam, netabuse). *See
policy*<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/dsh-nfsa.htm#>
 Comments powered by Movable Type 2.64  <http://www.movabletype.org/>


    <http://www.indiatogether.org/support/home.php?img=regular>

   - Cheque <javascript:void(null);>
   - Card <javascript:void(null);>
   - Bank <javascript:void(null);>

 Cheque

  *In India*
India Together
A-1205 Mantri Elegance
N S Palya,
Bannerghatta Rd
Bangalore
560076  *Outside India*
India Together
PO Box 26254
San Diego CA 92196
USA
 Card

  <http://www.indiatogether.org/support/contribute.htm>
 Charge to your credit or debit card using the secure e-payment gateway of
PayPal from anywhere.
*Contribute now* <http://www.indiatogether.org/support/contribute.htm>
 Bank

 *HDFC Bank*
Account Number 01332000003849
Account name: Civil Society Information Exchange
Account type: Current A/C
J P Nagar Branch, Bangalore
IFSC code: HDFC0000133

  Articles in related topics  OP-ED <http://www.indiatogether.org/opinions/>
- Inward security lens<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/may/fah-intfocus.htm>
- Congress: Its own
enemy<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/may/rgh-congress2.htm>
- *Charkha* and the
naturalist<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/may/rkr-darwin2.htm>
- Many more Mayawatis <http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/apr/chi-incest.htm>

 FOOD SECURITY <http://www.indiatogether.org/poverty/foodsec.htm>
- Food sovereignty, not just
security<http://www.indiatogether.org/2005/oct/agr-sovereign.htm>
- Global leadership, empty
stomachs<http://www.indiatogether.org/2005/jun/hlt-mdgoals.htm>
- Custodial malnutrition in M.P.
<http://www.indiatogether.org/2004/nov/pov-mpmalnutr.htm>
- Driven to bondage and
starvation<http://www.indiatogether.org/combatlaw/vol2/issue5/bondage.htm>

 LAWS <http://www.indiatogether.org/legislation/>
- One-third of the
lawmakers<http://www.indiatogether.org/2008/nov/law-women.htm>
- New rules for seizing
land<http://www.indiatogether.org/2008/may/law-land.htm>
- Fit to drive <http://www.indiatogether.org/2008/feb/law-epilepsy.htm>
- Guarding the guardians<http://www.indiatogether.org/2008/jan/law-judges.htm>



 India Together Ad Network   <http://www.workanhour.org/>



  RECENTLY IN INDIA TOGETHER    •  Jhunjhunu: A town full of
surprises<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/gov-jhun.htm>
 •  Making Kargil serve a
purpose<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/fah-kargil.htm>
 •  HT crops are too risky to
tolerate<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/agr-htweeds.htm>
 •  Drowning Himachalis, pampering
Delhi<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/env-renuka.htm>
 •  The prickliness of our foreign
relations<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/rkr-foreign.htm>
 •  Food for all? Not through the
NFSA.<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/dsh-nfsa.htm>
 •  Documenting the flesh
trade<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/rvw-traffic.htm>
 •  Civil litigation? No,
thanks.<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/gov-civil.htm>
 •  Media policy: A citizens'
wishlist<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/med-mediareg.htm>
 •  Sex meets society, in
court<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/edt-sec377.htm>
 •  Expert panel giving conflicted IPR
approvals<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/env-bioiprs.htm>
 •  Your identification,
please<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/ash-uidai.htm>
 •  The spirit of Mumbai's
cars<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/eco-sealink.htm>
 •  The chancellors' vice<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jul/rgh-vice.htm>
 •  The great Goan land
scam<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/gov-goascam.htm>
 •  The importance of Hyderabad municipal
elections<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/gov-loksatta.htm>
 •  Privatisation of
behaviour<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/rkr-pribeh.htm>
 •  Alarming malnutrition pushing children out of
schools<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/hlt-malnutr1.htm>
 •  Looking at China, missing
Pakistan<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/fah-trinuke.htm>
 •  Awarded in haste,
withheld<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/env-award.htm>
 •  River basin studies: A half-hearted
attempt<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/env-basin.htm>
 •  Price of rice, price of
power<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/psa-ricepower.htm>
 •  A law with flaws <http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/ksh-wbill.htm>
 •  Calcutta High Court steps in against corporal
punishment<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/hrt-corporal.htm>
 •  Questions of policy<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/rgh-policy.htm>
 •  In the cross fire between security and insurgency
<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/pce-manifire.htm>  •  Lion poacher
nabbed, awaits trial<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/env-lionpoach.htm>
 •  By the skin of their
teeth<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/env-anitrade.htm>
 •  Sehore: Once vibrant, now in
disarray<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/gov-sehore.htm>
 •  The empire flows
again<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/jun/env-cotton.htm>
 •  Fishy, with lots of
money<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/may/eco-assamfish.htm>
 •  Elections 2009: A grand
success<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/may/gov-vote2009.htm>
 •  Inflation: perception
andreality<http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/may/eco-inflation.htm>
    ------------------------------
 © Civil Society Information Exchange Pvt. Ltd., all rights reserved.
 *Home* <http://www.indiatogether.org/> | *About us*
<http://www.indiatogether.org/main/we.htm> | *Overview*
<http://www.indiatogether.org/main/overview.htm> | *Support*
<http://www.indiatogether.org/support/home.php> | *Contact Us*
<http://www.indiatogether.org/input/comments.htm> | *Disclaimer*
<http://www.indiatogether.org/main/disclaimer.htm>


More information about the reader-list mailing list