[Reader-list] Crime and No Punishment: Malegaon Blast Accused Get a Respite

[Javed]

Dear Rajen
You say that "RSS does not hate Muslims or Christians", but you seem
to be ignoring all the hate-propaganda literature that is produced by
RSS and its allies, and the fact that RSS shakhas in small towns
brainwash little children against Muslims. Have you seen these 2
documentary films called "Boys in the Branch" and "Men in the Trees"
(directed by Lalit Vachani) that explore exactly how the RSS
infiltrates the minds of youngsters. Do watch them if you can.
Working for the nation is fine, but at whose cost?

J

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Rajendra Bhat
Uppinangadi<rajen786uppinangady at gmail.com> wrote:
> Rakesh jee,
>   you have your intellect to analyse and judge, you are free citizen of
> India, but your sweeping judgement of RSS is absolutely wrong, and you are
> entitled to your views, but alteast have the patience to see the working of
> RSS before you start quoting from the articles of regular baiters like
> Ashish Nandy and the tribe of pseudo -seculars, let me re-assert, RSS does
> not hate muslims or christians, RSS men and women are volantary men and
> women who work for the nation , that too with the hope that the wall in the
> partition of 1947 will be brought down, all live with harmony and peace
> irrespective of their faith, no faith followers dominating the "majority" or
> "minority" on the basis of faith, converting from faiths to garner votes
> with vote banks.
> Muslims demanded partition and got it, but worked and struggled with all
> against slavery and  the British rule, but the land mass was not loot after
> robbery to be distributed after freedom. Only 23 percent went to the
> partitioned land, rest assured the leaders and the nation that they will be
> living harmoniously with their hindu brothers, but we have seen the deviant
> in them, and the silent majority of muslims tolerating such deviants with
> NGOs.
> As to the deviants of the lot, they are emboldened by the fact that they
> though, in very small quantum, numerically, have supporters in so
> called pseudo seculars who have love of freedom to fight for any faith as
> legal., but not hindu, because then it is communal, not secular.!
> Regards,
> Rajen.
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Rakesh Iyer <rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Rajen jee
>>
>> While it certainly is a questionable practice not to declassify the
>> documents of intelligence of about more than 30 years ago, you seem to make
>> a complete mockery of the investigations in the Malegaon case, as if Hindus
>> can not be party to any terror blasts within the country, more so those who
>> believe in the 'Hindutva' ideology.
>>
>> This is a wrong value-based position and I strongly disagree with it. One
>> must not forget that the Sangh Parivar is such is based on the ideological
>> position of disregarding the rights of the minorities to a life of dignity,
>> and this is certainly a shame when compared with the ideals on which the
>> Indian Constitution was and is still based. (Unless of course you believe
>> that the Constitution itself is a shame to begin with).
>>
>> Any matter must be thoroughly investigated and only after proper
>> investigations should we derive conclusions from it. Whether it be Malegaon
>> or Mumbai blasts, this should be the way to go. Also, if matters relating to
>> the case are present in the public domain, they should be presented to the
>> public from the point of view of both sides (the accuser and the accused).
>> And specifically, if people have doubts regarding the direction or certain
>> matters within the case, these can and should be raised in the media and
>> elsewhere for public discussion.
>>
>> The shameful part is that in India, when someone is claimed to be a
>> terrorist, he/she is taken to be one irrespective of whether the final
>> investigations indeed state the same or not. The basic notion of 'innocent
>> until proven guilty' is reversed to be stated as 'guilty even if termed
>> innocent by courts' in such cases. Whether it be Geelani or Sadhvi Pragya
>> Thakur, that has happened. I have not seen the concerned articles as
>> mentioned by Mr. Puniyani, but I believe that unless one has evidence to
>> prove the judgement as wrong, or valid questions regarding the basis on
>> which the judgement was made, one should not make atrocious allegations of
>> this kind.
>>
>> Therefore, on the same grounds as I feel that Puniyani jee's side may be
>> wrong, I equally feel that your side can also be wrong.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Rakesh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Rajen.
>
>