[Reader-list] China should break up India: Chinese strategist

[Rajendra Bhat Uppinangadi]

Dear all,     it is again, public postures as China knows well that it can
make some inroads if nation is divided, but why blame China only, US of
America  did it successfully with USS of Russia.? And is on that path of
breaking islamic states , first by dividing the followers of faith as shias
and sunnis, kurdhish and others, to put their puppet on seat of power, India
is already having american puppet as PM.!

Regards,

Rajen.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Rakesh Iyer <rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all
>
> Chinese strategists, by publishing such articles, constantly prove that
> they
> are a part of the group which comprises the biggest fools of the world.
>
> The reason why India exists as one is not so much the appeasement or the
> Hindu religion factor, but the fact that India is a democracy. Considering
> that India has the third largest Muslim population in the world, and has
> close to 15% of minority population in the country, if people of these
> religions felt that they are threatened in India, they would have either
> left the country (in the case of Muslims, during Partition) or would have
> participated in clandestine activities to destroy the country totally (
> like
> more blasts or more riots or attacks).
>
> Instead, even in riots, it's Muslims who have suffered, and yet there have
> not been that many blasts or that frequent ones as one would have thought
> if
> the above mentioned were the case. By and large, Muslims do believe in the
> sense of fairness and justice in Indian democracy, and they realize that
> the
> unfairness in the system exists despite religious differences, that is, it
> is directed for all rather than people of particular religions.
>
> The same is true for Christians and other minorities as well.
>
> The problem is with China to a fair degree (India also creates problems but
> not of the kind I am expressing now). If China would have been a democratic
> nation, so many people (approximately one-sixth of population of the world)
> would not have been living with denial of political and social freedoms.
> Chinese state has to constantly keep their people under state of oppression
> and make-shift state-controlled news media to ensure that people don't
> revolt against the state. At least the Indian media is able to counter the
> govts. on various issues, and these govts have been of different political
> inclinations and arrangements (coalition, single party based, BJP led, Cong
> led, Left led and so on). Whereas for China, they are in a double
> disadvantage position in a conflict with India, because unlike India where
> the central govt has a democratic standing at least, the Chinese govt does
> not have it, and there can be situations of managing internal revolt and
> external attack at the same time, something that is very difficult in
> India.
>
>
> Chinese state feels that India is jealous of them for their growth. I feel
> that we should not be jealous but should be learning from the good and bad
> of their policies. China has fooled itself into believing that they will be
> able to dominate the world on the basis of their military power. The fact
> is
> that China is considered strong because of its economic power (and somewhat
> because of its relevance in negotiations with North Korea for the US).
>
> What they don't realize is that not only do people have the ability to self
> distruct, but also that people would never succumb to oppression on a
> constant basis. The happenings in Xinjiang province a few months ago, as
> well as those in Tibet, bear testimony to that.
>
> But then, the only answer China has to that is force. Probably instead of
> concentrating on breaking up India (which is a laughable claim from them
> with the Indian state being quite powerful and democracy functioning very
> well), they should concentrate on bringing democracy in China which can
> help
> in development of all. Infact, to our credit, the Indian democracy
> succeeded
> in bringing an NREGA in India, much before China could bring the 'New Deal'
> for reconstruction in China of infrastructure which could help in bringing
> employment for the poor (and yet, employment is not a right there).
>
> And if still the priorities of Chinese state are Tawang and breaking up
> India, they can continue living in a fool's world, and my sympathies are
> with ordinary Chinese citizens.
>
> If I may say so, it's much easier to break up China because what you have
> to
> do is to create a sense of conflict between minorities and majority (Han
> Chinese), from the nationalist point of view, and their authorities won't
> be
> able to control it (no democracy there, so there will be no settlement and
> listening to minorities as well). Whereas in India, that would not be the
> case.
>
> And it's the Right in India, rather than the Left which threatens to
> destroy
> this arrangement, because they want subjugation of the minorities rather
> than trying to become a right-of-centre party. And by Right, you all would
> probably understand whom I am referring to.
>
> Regards
>
> Rakesh
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>



-- 
Rajen.