[Reader-list] see some meaning in Yasin Malik's choice

[Aditya Raj Kaul]

Dear Rakesh,

>From Wikepedia knowledge you have now yet again moved to another part known
as the propaganda of 'English media'. I wonder how much Yasin Malik can even
read to have gained such drastic transformation that he is now being called
the modern 'Gandhian'. It is quite amusing as in younger days he was a
street hooligan chasing girls and left schooling at a primary age, later he
climbed the barbed wires of the border to get arms training along with a few
hundred others to initiate a bloody killing spree in the peaceful valley of
Kashmir. Not that he cannot gain such transition, but that would be a
miracle in all ways if it at all is true.

The first step on his part to peace and change would have been an open
apology to the Kashmiri Pandits for killing their innocent members and
followed by a surrender openly for his crimes. Now that, we haven't even
seen an iota of such attitude we are pretty sure how fool-proof this
political game of this so called changed man is. With a character make-over,
help from his lobby in New Delhi, Islamabad, and some other world cities he
has easily fooled common people. The Indian Government of course has been
using him on and off; he is on direct pay rolls; otherwise he would have
long been tried for his crimes and put behind bars. There are organisations
like PUCL, Amnesty, Association of Disappeared Persons in Kashmir, and some
puppets like Arundhati Roy, Gautam Navlakha and a prominent documentary film
maker who is a member of this forum (Jashn-e-aazadi fame); who are being
used as his messangers.

I have relevant documents which say how many cases are pending against him
across the valley; among them two important ones being handled by the CBI.
Not just hundreds Kashmiri Pandits; but he has even killed four IAF men
openly exact 20 years ago.

I think even you should try to reach the J&K High Courts and see for
yourself how difficult is it to carry on with the legal work. Not that it is
corrupt and a tedious exercise; but other reasons which you should
understand without mention. Otherwise with so many media reports in the
early days the Court could have easily taken a suo-motto Notice of his
barbaric crimes against humanity. It is unfortunate that even the Supreme
Court is silent on him and the exodus of Kashmiri Hindus; whereas it spoke
quite blunt on the Gujarat much hyped riots.

I'll certainly inform you if at all there is progress in any of the cases.
Till then it goes just like a popular hindi movie dialog, "Tareekh pe
Tareekh".

No Indian Courts, No International NGOs, No Human Rights Bodies, No NHRC, No
Liberal & Secular Social Activists, Writers and lastly No Government has
tried to care for our plight. They have all remained silent for last 20
years; many retarded people now even claim that the most unfortunate forced
Pandit exodus at the hands of Islamic 'Revolutionaries' was actually a
economic migration. This is what we have come to. Is there anything I can
reply to this mindless claim ?

Tell me:

Why can't we demand for JUSTICE when everybody is turning a blind eye to us
?

Why can't we protest against psychopath killers like Yasin Malik, Bitta
Karate and demand a death penalty for them ?

Why is it that some people get so uncomfortable with our constant protests,
awareness campaigns, and articles which speak nothing but truth ?

You suggest that we should return to those clusters which the Govt. intended
to build for us in some corners of Kashmir. Do you think we are some
temporary work force which should be accomodated somewhere in the corner and
things move on, on their own thereafter ? Its stupidity to make such
clusters in the first place, which was initiated by Mufti Sayeed and now is
being opposed by Omar's NC.

Its unfortunate that mention of  'Kashmiri Pandits' is mere token in
Government dealings, packages, policies or any other economic plans. Our
viewpoint, suggestions and political demands are ignored.

It was in a survey of a prominent english news channel where it was wrongly
stated that Kashmiris want 'Aazadi'. This exact survey was studied by
analyists who had no bias and it all porved to be a big mess up. The entire
survey sample and the connotation was wrong. Again google might be of help
to you. Or even Reader's List archives which had a long debate on it.

As I said before 'Aazadi' term has now just become subjected to the rooms of
Hurriyat and JKLF. The common people believe in the Indian Democracy and it
is these heroes of Hate such as Yasin Malik, Shabir Shah, Syed Ali Shah
Geelani etc. who time and again brainwash people which result in loss of
innocents. The freedom given to these leaders needs to be curbed for free
flow of democracy in the valley. These leaders are actually 'Mohalla & Gali
leaders' who do not have a base or a framework of mind towards development
and progress. They have their singular personal motives for which they work
and carry on with their shops.

There is not a breakdown of trust between Kashmiri Pandits and Muslims who
are now based in the valley. But actually, Kashmiri Pandits don't trust most
of them as they remained mute spectators to our exodus. Omar Abdullah the
J&K Chief Minister recently confessed to this in front of media. I don't
think I need to say more. The reversal of the process of ethnic cleansing is
the only first step towards peace and reconciliation.

Panun Kashmir is a political demand, which will exist how so ever you may
disagree or agree with it. It is the only way to ensure our safety, secure
our shrines and property and it is secular in character. Not like so called
'Aazadi' which is based on Religious lines. No such demand as such of
'Aazadi' is acceptable to any sane human being which has put its base on the
blood of the minority Hindu Community of the valley which gave the world
well-known teachers, politicians, scientists, scholars etc.

For again your kind information, early last year we had put ahead a step to
have talks with your pet Hurriyat. But its chairman Mirwaiz out rightly
rejected it. You have google and our campaign blog to see how it was
reported in media and what led to this consequence. We tried our bit, and
saw in how much murky waters things are in reality.

We even have efforts on the ground level here. We have many 'Kashmiri
Muslim' friends who support us and openly campaign against Islamic Terrorist
Yasin Malik. What problems do others have ?

'Aazadi' is now a thing of the past, that too if at all it ever existed. I
don't have any comments for it further.

Kashmiri Pandits will never forgive terrorist Yasin Malik; lets be straight
on it. We'll continue to campaign under law for his arrest and conviction.
There is lot to happen my friend.. As I said bookish and wikipedia things
are easy to say and it looks good in theory and again whatever Media says or
propagates isn't true. Lot happens behind the curtains..

Thanks





On 2/5/09, Rakesh Iyer <rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Aditya
>
> Your reply has raised certain questions and points in my mind, which I wish
> to express further.
>
> For your kind information, in Wikipedia, there is no such information as
> Yasin Malik saying that he read Gandhi's works to become 'non-violent'. I do
> agree that there are people like this who initially commit acts of violence,
> and then say that they have read something which has made them non-violent.
> However, the fact remains that if we go in the history of what happened in
> Kashmir since 1990, once insurgency started, it was Yasin Malik who was the
> first person to agree to talks with the Indian Union to get 'azadi' for
> Kashmir. And this is not the information from Wikipedia. This is something I
> have managed to get thanks to an important lecture I attended a few days
> ago, organized by PUCL, Tamil Nadu unit.
>
> Second. I have also read that Yasin Malik is infact a double agent of both
> the Indian and the Pakistani establishments, and he serves the purpose of
> both to embarass each other. Some actions have also been pointed out to this
> effect, where he has embarassed both Indian and Pakistani establishments in
> different actions. However, the way the statements have been put up is just
> casting aspersions on Malik itself. If there are facts pertaining to the
> fact that Malik indeed has contacts which he has been using, then they must
> be brought out in public. For after all, as law says, to prove any
> statement, the proof must be 'proof beyond doubt' to satisfy the case.
> Hence, the allegation against Malik that he is a 'stooge' of the Indian
> government, remains just that, a mere allegation, with nothing to
> substantiate it. As for the cases against Malik, let them be proved in
> court. And you could inform me if you can, about the progress in these
> cases.
>
> Third. When I talked about Singur, Gujarat and even say tribals, I was
> talking about the people who were actually facing the problem, not the NGO's
> or others at all. I accept that these people got great support from the
> NGO's and others, but the fact remains that in all these cases, these very
> people have also suffered a lot, and still they themselves didn't make as
> much noise as has been portrayed in media. Infact, each became famous thanks
> to incidents and entry of people who were famous. Singur became famous more
> so once Trinamool Congress entered the fray agitating for the local people.
> Gujarat became famous because of NGO's and English media entering in to
> cover the riots live (the local Gujarati media was involved in biased
> reporting, that too made it famous). And tribals have not managed to gain
> the attention of the media, because important political formations and/or
> the upper elites of society have not involved themselves in the struggle of
> the tribals.
>
> What I basically wanted to say was that, the Pandits have yes, been
> fighting for the cause of justice for the past 19-20 years. And yes, they
> may not have received any support from the NGO's or the government. But does
> that mean, that you can go on asking for retribution in the name of justice?
> And more importantly, if the govt. of India is willing to provide them
> houses in the Valley itself, why is it so that Pandits are not willing to
> return at all?
>
> Let me clearly state here. There has been a complete breakdown of trust
> between the Pandits and the Kashmiri Muslims. The incidents of 1990,
> whichever way one looks at it, has resulted in disastrous consequences of
> today. On one hand, Kashmiri Pandits have still not been able to return back
> to their homeland. On the other, Kashmiri Muslims have been subjected to
> living under an 'army state' where all freedoms have been clamped down on,
> which is against the very notion of 'democracy'. And for me, both are wrong.
>
>
> And the solution of Panun Kashmir, which you as a community have
> proposed(not all may be, but certainly some have put up this solution), is
> not the solution because it won't be backed by the Muslims living in the
> Valley, though I am not against putting it up for referendum. Similarly, the
> rights of minorities must be protected, and therefore the rights of Pandits
> to their homeland must be accepted. Therefore, the important thing is not
> only to ask for justice, but also in some sense, forgive people by not at
> least asking for death sentences by the Pandits on one hand, and by
> surrendering arms and voluntarily facing cases on the part of Kashmiri
> Muslims on the other (here I refer to those who took up arms, not those who
> didn' t do so).
>
> Secondly, there has to be a dialogue between both the communities to build
> trust for each other. That should be the path ahead for the return of
> Pandits.
>
> As I see it, I dont' see either of the steps having been taken uptill now.
> Can you at least, being one of the speakers for the Kashmiri Pandits (one of
> the many speakers, actually) tell whether you made efforts for the same? For
> after all, not all Muslims living in your very homeland area can be
> 'traitors'. And as you yourself accept, they are human beings.
>
> I haven't called you pseudos. What I say is that there's a limit to going
> around portraying yourself as a victim, to justify any action of yours.
>
> And finally one more thing. It has been time and again said that democratic
> elections in J&K are not the substitute for the dominant feeling of 'azadi',
> and the people there, majority of them want 'azadi', with or without
> Hurriyat. Since you (and I think many in rest of India) feel that this is
> not the case, I think that the Indian Union should better conduct a
> referendum in the Valley and make the results public to find out whether
> people really want azadi or not. If they want it, then better give it. If
> they don't want it, you can burn declare public holidays commemorating the
> same occasion, and can also burn my effigies. I have no problems for that
> effect.
>
> The reason why I ask for the referendum is this. If I am true, I know I
> will always win no matter how much someone conspires against me. Then why
> not let the truth win once again, if you believe (and so many in rest of
> India believe) that your side is true. Go ahead, and do it.
>
> And while I have no pain at all with Kashmiri Pandits raising their voice
> against the Indian Govt, what I have pain with is that the Pandits feel that
> only they are democratic, whereas the 'azadi struggle' is undemocratic.
> Infact, Kashmiris are now being painted by the brush of terrorism and being
> Pakistanis, whereby it is being stated that Kashmiris want to be Pakistanis.
> The fact is that as numerous surveys and interviews of common people bring
> out, they want to be independent of both India and Pakistanis. And more
> importantly, even in an azad Kashmir, I believe that Pandits deserve to have
> a place there. And therefore, I am not in favor of any independent state
> till any resolution of the place of Pandits in this new state and the local
> society is found.
>
> Regards
>
> Rakesh
>
>
>


-- 

-- 
Aditya Raj Kaul