[Reader-list] protests against Gaza Siege - ideological arrogance

[Pawan Durani]

Dear Rakesh ,

An interesting post !

However on a quick note , i would like to mention that Kashmiri Hindus wont
return to valley in the present circumstances.

Kashmiri Hindus have over 1000 years of similar history with more than 8
forced exodus .

The only way Kashmiri Hindus would go back to valley is with the creation of
union territory of Panun Kashmir.

For more details log into www.panunkashmir.org

Regards

Pawan Durani

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Rakesh Iyer <rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com>wrote:

> Dear Lalit Sir (and all)
>
> As I went through your article, I was reminded of a video I saw regarding
> the Kashmiri Pandit situation. This video was shot more than 10 years ago.
> A
> lot of water must have flown down in Jhelum since then.
>
> I agree with the fact that Kashmiri Pandits should not have been thrown out
> of their homes. And the reason they were asked to leave is primarily
> because, Kashmiris wanted azadi. And the violence was wrong on that count.
> Having said that, the root cause of the problem must also be studied. And
> that is where the problem starts.
>
> Unlike say Hydrebad and Junagadh, which acceded to India based on popular
> support, the state of Jammu & Kashmir didn't do so because they supported
> India, but because they had faith in Sheikh Abdullah. And since India
> jailed
> him for 22 years, Kashmiris didn't have great faith in India, because they
> believed that they had been cheated. Continuing with all this, we had
> situations in 1983 when the elected governments were overthrown with use of
> money power and new CM's installed as puppets. And the biggest disaster
> were
> the 1987 elections, when the NC won thanks to the most unfair election ever
> conducted in Kashmir.
>
> In any other part of India, it would have led to an agitation against the
> elected government, and the people would have demanded re-election of the
> state assembly, since the Indian nationalism rhetoric has seeped down among
> the masses, and hence we all consider ourselves as Indians(it is ironic
> since unlike European nations, there can't be a nation-statist definition
> of
> India). But among the Kashmiris, this is not the case, and hence
> considering
> this as another blow from India, they asked for azadi. And this has been
> the
> case since then. They asked for Pandits to leave, since they believed they
> started believing in Yasin Malik and their folk, that Pandits are Indian
> spies and should be made to leave.
>
> The conduct of Kashmiri Muslims then was not certainly one to be bravely
> talked about. It was very shameful and disgusting on their part. But does
> that mean that one wrong must be answered back with another wrong/ For the
> last 18-19 years, the Indian Army personnel are stationed in Kashmir. We
> all
> know the armed forces stationed in Mumbai for 3 days during Mumabi attacks.
> That has been the positioning of armed forces across streets in Srinagar,
> not for 3 days but for more than 18 years. Any person can be checked any
> time of the day, as if all Kashmiri Muslims are terrorists.
>
> Army personnel have committed grave human right violations, including
> prostitutions and fake encounters across the state. Is that what they asked
> for? Consider yourself. Even if you were not the supporter of azadi in the
> state, if your father or mother is killed, would you ever support the
> Indian
> State? I don't think so, for that is the normal tendency.
>
> The Leftists have fought for freedom and right to life of Muslims and
> Christians. It's time they also realize there is a right to life for Hindus
> as well.  There is no consideration on the part of the Left for these
> Pandits. Having said that, there is no concern among the Army personnel for
> the Kashmiris who have suffered the brunt of the violence from both sides,
> the army as well as the terrorists.
>
> And finally, the last part. The Pandits may have been in a terribly bad
> situation about 10 years back, but that certainly is not the case. If I am
> not wrong, a tribunal was introduced to solve cases of land grabbing where
> the land of those displaced, was grabbed by locals. People were sentenced
> to
> punishments and jails. What's more, as one of my friends himself got to
> know
> from some others who belonged to Kashmir, Pandits have given their land for
> rent (they have houses there), or sold it, so that they don't have anything
> to do with it later.
>
> The last straw was when Manmohan Singh, the Prime Minister himself
> inaugurated the buildings for Pandits to come back. Credit must be given to
> Mufti Mohammed Sayeed's healing touch and his promise that he will try to
> get the Pandits back. The Kashmiri Muslims themselves hoped that Pandits
> would come back. But the Pandits didn't come, for they didn't believe the
> Kashmiri Muslims any longer.
>
> Since there is a trust deficit now, and it seems the Pandits would never
> return, I would like to ask all of you, including Lalit Sir you as well,
> whether
>
> a) Has any study been made to know today's conditions of the Pandits? If
> for
> reservation, we can't rely on the 1931 census to decide the quota of
> percentage to be reserved for OBC's, then why should we rely on the
> situation of Pandits 10 or 15 years back?
>
> b) Whether there is any chance of the Pandits coming back or not? If yes,
> why? If no, why? And if the reasons are economic and trust based, then can
> we really get back the Pandits to Kashmir? Is it really necessary then?
>
> These are some of the questions which need to be asked.
>
> I again repeat one thing. The displacement of Pandits in the manner it was
> done is wrong, was wrong and will always be wrong. But similarly, the human
> right violations by the Indian army and the local police will also be
> wrong.
>
>
> And two wrongs never make a right. But of course, for the hard core BJP and
> the left supporters, they do make a right. The proof is Singur and Gujarat.
>
> Regards
>
> Rakesh
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>