[Reader-list] Vote Now

Rajendra Bhat Uppinangadi rajen786uppinangady at gmail.com
Tue Jul 28 12:31:46 IST 2009


Dear all,

    One of the recent development in the nation has been to carve out
states, smaller, out of bigger states, the idea supported by many, that such
formation will enable better governance, catering to regional aspirations of
the local, regional people. But what is the truth. ? After formation of such
state, the ruling party, mainly Congress has lost its presence in governance
to regional parties, or BJP, funds from centre for the relief to the people
has always been blocked by the Congress party for partisan considerations,
be it Kosi floods, naxal menace or sea erosion in different states. Only if
the regional satraps are amenable to the Congress party, the demands for
funds, genuine or otherwise have been met, be it in Jharkhand, Chattisgarh,
Orissa, Uttaranchal or West Bengal.

  Thus the UPA has been instrumental in promoting regional separation, bias
and invokong passions between the federal states, be it with shared
resources of rivers, mining or forest and flora and fauna.In the
circumstanes, Srinagar which is now ravages by terror acts and violence, was
the money spinner for the state with tourists, mainly from other states of
the nation, a small percentage from abroad, is already in dumps with lesser
tourist traffic thanks to leaders like Mehbooba Mufti and her goon brigade
in league with separatists.A separate union territoy for kashmiri hindus is
not practically feasible with the type of secularism sponsored by the system
of governance, as other kashmiris , mainly muslims, silent ones who do not
wish to be in terror, are in all other states with kashmiri
clothes,shawls,handicrafts  and selling there goods in those states.
Initially, they come for business and to live with dignity and decent
earning, but slowly and steadily, the friday namaz for these in local
mosques have turned them, on filled belly, to be sleeper cells for terror.
The local police also took lenient view to start with, as these young men,
seemingly are well behaved, do their sales, business with local population,
but later buy houses in all the states where they are in business, later
supporting for the faith by giving sheltor to deviant minds of the religious
faithful.When all this is happening, the other people of the states can not
buy land in the state of jammu and kashmir, those hindus in kashmir have to
bear the brunt of inhuman religious faithfuls., prefer to settle in other
states like those muslims who do not wish to be part of game of violence.

 What is the guarantee that this will not happen in the territory formed for
kashmiri hindu migrants.?  Better approach would be, for the state and
central administration to be firm with separatists, remove the kid gloves
worn in tackling these deviants, let the law take firm action on traitors of
the nation, and also their voices, which claim secular for human rights of
inhumans.

Regards,

Rajen.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Pawan Durani <pawan.durani at gmail.com>wrote:

> An overwhelming % of people seem to be supporting the idea that more
> state assemblies , on line of MP state , should pass a resolution
> supporting carving out a Union Territory for Kashmiri Hindus in
> Kashmir.
>
> The result so far are
>
> Yes : 93%
>
> No : 4%
>
> Can't say : 3%
>
> You can still vote , please visit www.thekashmir.wordpress.com
>
> Pawan
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Vedavati Jogi<vedavati_jogi at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > YES!
> >
> > vedavati
> >
> > --- On Mon, 27/7/09, Pawan Durani <pawan.durani at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Pawan Durani <pawan.durani at gmail.com>
> > Subject: [Reader-list] Vote Now
> > To: "reader-list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
> > Date: Monday, 27 July, 2009, 9:14 PM
> >
> > Should other state legislative assemblies also pass a resolution
> supporting
> > a separate Homeland for Kashmiri Hindu Refugees in Kashmir ?
> >
> > Vote online on the above Question
> >
> > Vote Here :  www.thekashmir.wordpress.com
> > _________________________________________
> > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> > Critiques & Collaborations
> > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe
> > in the subject header.
> > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Looking for local information? Find it on Yahoo! Local
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>



-- 
Rajen.


More information about the reader-list mailing list