[Reader-list] The trouble with Cairo-Irshad Manji

[rashneek kher]

How will Obama reach out to Muslims while looking over his shoulder at his
authoritarian Egyptian hosts?

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

The trouble with Cairo

Irshad Manji
The Globe and Mail

Barack Obama has speech problems. True, he delivers a message mellifluously.
But even before giving a major address to the Muslim world this Thursday,
America's communicator-in-chief sounds confused.

Consider his choice of setting. Cairo, according to White House press
secretary Robert Gibbs, “in many ways represents the heart of the Arab
world.” Confusion No. 1: Arabs and Muslims are interchangeable.

They're not. Fewer than 20 per cent of Muslims live in the Middle East.
Cairo is no more the heart of the Muslim world than Jakarta is.

Indeed, Indonesia would have been far richer soil for this occasion. It's
the most populous Muslim country, boasting as many believers as the entire
Arab region. It's a crucible of religious moderation; a national election in
April affirmed the upper hand of secular parties.

And, despite Mr. Obama's early childhood in Jakarta, Indonesia remains
peripheral in the world's imagination. That could have been fixed. Isn't
inclusion - making the marginal mainstream - what the Obama presidency is
all about?

Maybe this missed opportunity will be compensated by content. But what could
Mr. Obama say that would show respect to his authoritarian Egyptian hosts
while reflecting the challenges he issued to Muslim dictators only months
ago?

In his inaugural speech on Jan. 20, the President all but named Egypt's
Hosni Mubarak when enunciating this line: “To those who cling to power
through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you
are on the wrong side of history ...”

To be sure, Mr. Obama immediately added that “we will extend a hand if you
unclench your fist.” Presumably, he meant that governing thugs must loosen
the vice-grip on their own populations if they're to enjoy America's favour.

If so, Mr. Obama's outreach is that much more confused. In recent years,
Cairo has become ground zero for vicious crackdowns on young democracy
activists. I've witnessed village boys, recruited by the Mubarak regime,
idling in mammoth green patrol wagons as they await cues from Cairo police.
Their job? To assault demonstrators who are peacefully demanding political
reform.

Last year, an Egyptian protester wrote me in desperation. “Do you know,” he
reported, “that a girl was arrested because she made a group on Facebook,
calling for a strike, and a famous journalist was jailed because he said
that Mubarak might be ill since he didn't show up at a ceremony? Sometimes I
dare to ask, while I am hiding in the dark, is there hope for us?”

Only two weeks ago, a similar e-mail appeared in my inbox from a student at
Cairo's Al-Azhar University, which is playing co-host to Mr. Obama and his
speech. “No one here [is] using his mind,” the student of sharia lamented.
“I can't say what I think, feel or want.”

These voices capture a spirit of openness that Mr. Obama claims to embrace.
Yet, he's repudiating them in a final gesture associated with Thursday's
speech: En route to Egypt, Mr. Obama will stop in Saudi Arabia, where
another coterie of criminals “cling to power” through the “silencing of
dissent.”

Obama-bashers may quip that he wants to perfect his bow to the Saudi king,
having swooned for His Highness at the G20 summit. But I don't give a fig
how the President greets the al-Saud clan as long as he speaks truth to
power about his supposedly signature issue: human rights.

“Don't hold your breath,” a friend of the White House recently suggested to
me. “I don't see human rights anywhere on the agenda.” Despite being a
supporter of the President and a confidante to one of his top aides, he
appeared befuddled. I am, too.

Perhaps all will be clear after the speech. Perhaps the alchemy of a silver
tongue and sturdy teleprompter will bring into sharp relief the strategy
crafted by a shrewd disciple of diplomacy. Perhaps.

I would simply remind Mr. Obama that his speech comes at the same time as
the 200th anniversary of Thomas Paine's death. This British-born American
revolutionary foresaw that human dignity is universal. “He that would make
his own liberty secure,” Paine noted, “must guard even his enemy from
oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that
will reach to himself.” Translation: Double standards protect no one.

Mr. Obama has already picked up on that point by announcing the end of
Guantanamo. Doubtless, he'll emphasize that decision on Thursday. But will
he hold his Muslim counterparts to the same standards of accountability that
he expects from America?

He must, if human rights are, in fact, human and not political. On this,
there can be no confusion.


-- 
Rashneek Kher
http://www.kashmiris-in-exile.blogspot.com
http://www.nietzschereborn.blogspot.com