[Reader-list] APJ letter
Shuddhabrata Sengupta
shuddha at sarai.net
Wed May 13 15:51:21 IST 2009
Dear All,
I find the discussion on what the ex-president and weapons designer
APJ Abdul Kalam said quite interesting. One of the things being
remarked upon is his impression that the Indian media highlights
negativity, as opposed, say to the media in Israel, which is always
committed to a positive potrayal of what goes on in Israel.
I do not know from where the ex-president got this impression, or
whether it is part of the current fascination with all things Israeli
amongst apologists of a strong state, because, from my cursory
familiarity with the Israeli press and media, segments of it are as
robustly critical of life in Israel, as anywhere else. So, sorry to
disappoint those on this list (and APJ Kalam) who think that the
media in Israel is a flat, uniform delivery mechanism for 'good news'
arrived at by consensus.
As an example, let me share below a text 'Hear the Other Side' by the
Israeli journalist Avirama Golan from the mainstream Israeli
newspaper Ha'aretz (this is from the English online edition) that I
found particularly striking during the attacks on Gaza earlier this
year.
-------------------------------
Hear the other side
By Avirama Golan
Tags: gaza, Israel news, Hamas
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1057370.html
There's no doubt that the terrible tragedy of Dr. Ezzeldeen Abu al-
Aish, who told Israeli television viewers in fluent Hebrew that he
lost three daughters and a niece to an Israeli tank shell during the
fighting in Gaza, has managed to finally penetrate the layer of cast
lead that has sealed the ears of the Israeli public since the Gaza
operation began. He made the killing suddenly appear tangible, close,
shocking and threatening.
It's Abu al-Aish's bad luck that he's "one of us" no less than "one
of them." He's an educated and successful physician who was offered a
job at a Canadian hospital after he worked and conducted research at
Israel's Soroka and Sheba medical centers. Moreover, and perhaps more
importantly, he speaks Hebrew and is proficient in the codes that
govern Israeli thinking and behavior. At a press conference in which
he pleaded for an end to the Gaza war - and to war in general - he
unconsciously appealed to the agitated mix of familial dedication and
longing for a peaceful life, the enlightened Western format that
constitutes the Israeli self-image.
Woe to Abu al-Aish; his efforts have come to nothing. While many
television viewers who had previously followed only what had been
presented to them as glorious military achievements shed a tear for
his loss, a woman called Levana Stern - who was apparently granted
blanket permission to speak abusively because of her status as mother
of three soldiers - disrupted the press conference by shouting at the
top of her voice: "I feel your pain, I'm totally with you, but who
knows what was going on in your house!"
Advertisement
People standing next to her, who were emboldened by her outburst,
protested the audacity of the hospital where he spoke to the press
for giving a platform to a Palestinian while Israeli soldiers were
fighting in Gaza. One woman even passionately called him a "piece of
trash." In despair, Abu al-Aish muttered, "They don't want to hear
the other side."
So much ink has been spilled on academic research about the voice of
the other in post-colonial society, and so many conferences and
articles have determined that Israeli society has long ago passed the
melting-pot stage and is now a multicultural society that makes space
for the voice of the other. Now Abu al-Aish has inadvertently
revealed how false that is. The residents of Gaza don't exist at all
in the Israeli consciousness, failing even to merit the status of
"other." But because the Gaza doctor works in Israel and has many
Israeli acquaintances, he was given a chance that thousands of others
have not had: the chance to speak on prime time (though only after
the blood of his daughters Bisan, Mayer and Aya was spilled in his
home).
Abu Al-Aish is not alone. Over the past years, Sderot residents have
repeatedly been accused of failing to act responsibly when they stay
there with their young children ("Why don't they evacuate them?"
people ask). Even many reporters share the unfounded sentiment that
everyone who could have left Sderot did so long ago, and only the
unfortunates who have nowhere to go are still there.
True, residents of the periphery are not a hated "other" like the
Palestinians, but they too are faceless and voiceless. Now the
residents of Sderot have become the beloved children for whose sake
the war was waged, but they will pay dearly for that. Some opponents
of the war see them as extreme right-wingers whose complaints are
exaggerated, saying that no Israeli child was killed by a rocket
during the war, while thousands were killed in Gaza. And some of the
war's supporters refuse to understand that the ongoing suffering of
Negev residents has made them angry, frustrated and full of hate -
but that the historic friendly ties they used to have with Gazans and
the mutual desire for normalization are just as authentic. Those
supporters also have contempt for the demand of thousands of
residents of the south, led by the "A Different Voice" group from
Sderot, who urged the government to do all it can to reach an
agreement rather than go to war.
The warped logic that prevails on the left as well as the right means
that whoever has not fled from Gaza to Canada is an impoverished
laggard at best, and a Hamas supporter at worst, and whoever has not
moved from Sderot to Tel Aviv's Rothschild Boulevard is an uneducated
and irresponsible Likud voter who brought this bad situation upon
himself. This is how the so-called "others" are used to defining the
Israeli consensus - an opaque and hate-filled consensus that denies
the complex reality in favor of intensifying frightened entrenchment.
Shuddhabrata Sengupta
The Sarai Programme at CSDS
Raqs Media Collective
shuddha at sarai.net
www.sarai.net
www.raqsmediacollective.net
More information about the reader-list
mailing list