[Reader-list] "Cong has Raj, superstars to thank for extra seats"

[Rajendra Bhat Uppinangadi]

Well pointed out,
 it may be pertinent to recall the book author by Shri. Zakir Hussain,
former President of India, in his book, Rule of minorities in Indian
democracy.  ( Though I do not remember the name of the book correctly, it is
not about minority faith, but learned analysis of voting practices in
democratic India.) In this book, the author analyses the facts of the
elections in early phases of Indian democracy, while at the time voting was
average about 53 percent, these votes scattered between one major party
Indian national Congress and atleast ten other small national parties like
Communist Party of India, Swathantra party, Republican Party of India,
Bharathiya Janasangh, Forward Blok, etc, effectively, the then Congress even
if it gets as little as 16 votes out of voted 53, was clear winner, thus the
doctrine of opposition unity index came in practice in 1977 during the
emergency days when all the opposition leaders including the left parties,
CPI and CPM found themselves denied of fundamental rights.

 The nation today has a different set of rules that divide the voters, based
on caste and faith, region and religion, but again, it is minority which
gets elected with divided polity.

   Only saving grace is the awareness of the voter, who was illiyerate then,
now atleast we have high school drop out literates, aspirations of the voter
when remain untouched by the rule of laws, the naxalite movement, movements
to demark new territories as new states have only contributed to divide the
polity further. If only elected governments take steps to govern without
ffear or favour, to uphold the rule of laws without discriminations bases on
caste, faith and creed, region or religion, India can be united at all
times, be it peace or war or a calamity affecting the nation.

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Kshmendra Kaul <kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com>wrote:

> In the Multi-Party election system operating in India, the
> first-past-the-post system used to declare a candidate as 'elected' often
> becomes a mockery of the essential principles associated with "Democracy".
>
> We get a plethora of candidates who have not received majority support in
> their consituency getting 'elected' as representatives of their
> constituency. The cumulative effect is that a Political Party or Alliance
> who are recognised as a legitimate "Democratically Elected Government" in
> fact have had a minority of voter-support. Majority of voters have not
> considered them as worthy of placing their faith in them.
>
> This is not Democracy. It is a convoluted and faulty interpretation of  and
> acceptance of Democracy.
>
> Because of the understandbly obsessive focus on 'seats', the Post-election
> results get commented upon with such easily used terms as "Retention";
> "Sweep"; "Decimation".
>
> While "we the people", the ordinary citizens cannot be faulted for making
> such judgements, shockingly the Media too participates with such
> adjectival-shallowness.
>
> It is only the comparisons of the vote-shares that can tell the real story
> of how well a candidate has fared in a constituency or tell us about the
> 'real' support base of a Political Party in a constituency or in a State or
> in the Country. It is only the changes in the vote-shares that can testify
> to whether there has been a "Retention"; or a"Sweep"; or a "Decimation".
>
> The reproduced piece from DNA is a good example of how the results of an
> election in India need to be analysed.
>
> Kshmendra
>
>
> Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:22 IST
> "Cong has Raj, superstars to thank for extra seats"
> Arati R Jerath / DNA
>
> The Congress-led UPA has three men to thank for its seat surge in the 2009
> Lok Sabha polls: Raj Thackeray, Chiranjeevi, and Vijayakanth. They helped
> the victorious alliance win nearly 50 more seats in Maharashtra, Andhra
> Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu than anyone would have expected, as a result of
> which the UPA ended up with 262 seats, against the 222 it won in 2004.
>
> The big story is in Andhra Pradesh, where matinee idol Chiranjeevi
> single-handedly took the Congress from defeat to victory and shattered
> Telugu Desam Party chief N Chandrababu Naidu’s dreams. An analysis of the
> results reveals that the Chiranjeevi factor decimated the TDP in 26
> constituencies. The Congress netted 33 seats, four more than in 2004.
>
> The Andhra Pradesh results are an irony of these elections. The Congress
> registered a drop of 3.84% in vote share but an increase of four seats,
> while the TDP’s vote share plummeted 14.92% and it won one more seat. If the
> vote share change of the two main parties is added, it is obvious where
> Chiranjeevi’s 17% vote share came from and which party he hit.
>
> The other actor who rescued the UPA was Vijayakanth, who scripted history
> in a state known for pendulum swings.
>
> For the first time in 23 years, the Tamil Nadu verdict was split, with the
> DMK-Congress combine picking up 26 seats and the AIADMK-led alliance having
> to settle for 13.
> Vijayakanth’s DMDK helped the Congress-DMK combine win in 14
> constituencies, including P Chidambaram’s hotly contested Sivaganga. In
> seven others, Jayalalithaa’s AIADMK alliance was precariously poised till
> the very end. Ultimately, it won those seats, but by narrow margins. The
> final tally for the UPA was 26, 18 to the DMK and eight to the Congress, in
> a state where the ruling alliance feared a wipe-out.
>
> The vote share figures tell a strange story in this state too. The DMK and
> the Congress registered an increase in vote shares but failed to sweep the
> state as in 2004, when their Democratic Progressive Alliance (which included
> the PMK and MDMK) won all 39 seats. The AIADMK’s vote share dropped by 2.79%
> but the party won nine seats, unlike the duck five years ago.
>
> The third game-changer was Raj. His Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) did
> exactly what it was expected to do. It cut into Shiv Sena-BJP votes and
> helped the Congress-NCP alliance to victory in 10 constituencies.
> Considering that the MNS contested only 12 seats, its delivery for the
> Congress-NCP was almost 100%. The UPA registered a spectacular second
> successive sweep in Mumbai and won Pune and Thane thanks to Raj.
>
> The vote share picture is interesting here too. The Congress party’s vote
> share fell 4.11% in Maharashtra but its seat tally rose by four, to 13. In
> contrast, the NCP’s vote share is up by a slender 0.97% but its seat tally
> came down by one, to eight.
>
> http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1257021
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>




-- 
Rajen.