[Reader-list] KASAV VERDICT

[A.K. Malik]

Dear Mr Kaul,
                 Still there are ways of keeping the convicted person from gallows by not acting on the file so you can circumvent the Great Constitution of India because some people have more 'rights' under this weak and pro-muslim Govt.
Regards,

(A.K.MALIK)


--- On Fri, 5/7/10, Kshmendra Kaul <kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Kshmendra Kaul <kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] KASAV VERDICT
> To: "sarai-list" <reader-list at sarai.net>, "Bipin Trivedi" <aliens at dataone.in>
> Date: Friday, May 7, 2010, 1:34 PM
> Dear Bipin
>  
> A. I am against the death penalty for anyone for any crime
> whatsoever. I believe the 'death penalty' is awarded in
> barbaric societies, and yes, India is still barbaric in many
> ways.
>  
> B. You might disagree on the above. That does not change
> the opportunity allowed in India for anyone convicted in a
> crime in a Lower Court to take the matter to a Higher
> Cour.  
>  
>      Since it is a question of a 'death penalty', Kasab
> has the right to have his case heard by the Higher Courts
> right upto the Supreme Court. After that he has the right to
> appeal to the President for waiver of the 'death penalty'.
> The Constitution of India provides that right. You cannot
> compare Civil Law of the Shah Bano case witha 'death
> penalty' being awarded. 
>  
>      No one can take that right away from Kasab.
>  
> Kshmendra
>   
> 
> --- On Thu, 5/6/10, Bipin Trivedi <aliens at dataone.in>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: Bipin Trivedi <aliens at dataone.in>
> Subject: [Reader-list] KASAV VERDICT
> To: "sarai-list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
> Date: Thursday, May 6, 2010, 3:33 PM
> 
> 
> AS EXPECTED, KASAV RIGHTLY GOT DEATH SENTENCE.
> 
> Though terrorist's Kasav case was crystal clear, but still
> we have gone for
> about 17 months fair trial and proved that how transparent
> our judicial
> system is unlike Pakistan. But, after this trial and
> judgment, he should not
> allow to appeal in the higher court and should be hanged in
> public
> immediately without further judicial procedure. if Indira
> Gandhi (ex PM)
> deny to obey court verdict and neglect law and Shah Banu
> case was revert out
> of law by parliament than why cannot this? India should
> show the world that
> country cannot compromise in integrity and take hard action
> if required like
> open public death sentence.
> 
> Thanks
> Bipin
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the
> city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net
> with subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list 
> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> 
> 
>       
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the
> city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net
> with subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list 
> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>