[Reader-list] KASHMIR SURVEY FINDS NO MAJORITY FOR INDEPENDENCE

Inder Salim indersalim at gmail.com
Sat Nov 6 22:23:54 IST 2010


Dear Bipin

it is 100 per cent
i thought of giving you some concession of 00.01 percent, but it does not work

what can one do?

love in any case

is


On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Bipin Trivedi <aliens at dataone.in> wrote:
> 99.99 of Kashmir valley against Indian presence there? Good day dream..............keep it up
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: reader-list-bounces at sarai.net [mailto:reader-list-bounces at sarai.net] On Behalf Of Inder Salim
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 2:57 PM
> To: reader-list
> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] KASHMIR SURVEY FINDS NO MAJORITY FOR INDEPENDENCE
>
> dear Samvit
>
> repeating the same para , it was on purpose, and it did it first time,
> just to see its effect on friends on the list, and you can see you and
> your like minded friends are reacting.
>
> yes,  it indeed provokes, so it is confirmed that when we use some
> propoganda repeatedly it does create some impact. Govt of India has
> used these tools in kashsmir, so has Govt of Pakistan, if you know the
> history of Radio of those days.
>
> i am not too fond of these surveys, but this is confirmed that 99.99
> percent people in kashmir valley are against Indian presence there.
> you may say otherwise, but if the day is day, we need to say it is day
> light, not night, right
>
> so what is your approach to that, Indian Army to quell that sentiment, or what ?
>
> The new politics of Kashmir valley is very profound, and you should
> see reflection of that in FB, how deep the pro azadi sentiment is, and
> how can you reverse that.?
>
> let us get real, and look serious in our arguments,
> with love
> is
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Samvit <samvitr at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Inder,
>> can you stop repeating the same paragraph again and again. I do not
>> understand what kind of behavior this is. You are making a mockery of this
>> forum. You have every right to put forth your views and contradict others
>> but that does not mean you stoop to such levels that you have to send spam.
>> This kind of behavior is very juvenile.
>> -SR
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Inder Salim <indersalim at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In the Muslim-majority Kashmir valley, which has been at the heart of a
>>> > 20-year-old insurgency against Indian rule, between 74 percent and 95
>>> > percent respondents favoured independent Kashmir.
>>>
>>> In the Muslim-majority Kashmir valley, which has been at the heart of a
>>> > 20-year-old insurgency against Indian rule, between 74 percent and 95
>>> > percent respondents favoured independent Kashmir.
>>>
>>> In the Muslim-majority Kashmir valley, which has been at the heart of a
>>> > 20-year-old insurgency against Indian rule, between 74 percent and 95
>>> > percent respondents favoured independent Kashmir.
>>>
>>> In the Muslim-majority Kashmir valley, which has been at the heart of a
>>> > 20-year-old insurgency against Indian rule, between 74 percent and 95
>>> > percent respondents favoured independent Kashmir.
>>>
>>> In the Muslim-majority Kashmir valley, which has been at the heart of a
>>> > 20-year-old insurgency against Indian rule, between 74 percent and 95
>>> > percent respondents favoured independent Kashmir.
>>>
>>> In the Muslim-majority Kashmir valley, which has been at the heart of a
>>> > 20-year-old insurgency against Indian rule, between 74 percent and 95
>>> > percent respondents favoured independent Kashmir.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Bipin Trivedi <aliens at dataone.in> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i_ynr0-yXCshxv0x802hR9DLu
>>> > 4fA
>>> >
>>> > (AFP) - May 27, 2010
>>> >
>>> > SRINAGAR, India - Less than half of residents in both the Indian and
>>> > Pakistani zones of Kashmir favour independence as a solution to end
>>> > unrest
>>> > in the disputed Himalayan region, a survey said Thursday.
>>> >
>>> > Conducted by British academic Robert Bradnock, the independent survey
>>> > found
>>> > that 44 percent of people in Pakistani-administered Kashmir favour
>>> > independence, and 43 percent in Indian-administered Kashmir.
>>> >
>>> > United Nations resolutions soon after the partition of the sub-continent
>>> > in
>>> > 1947 called for a plebiscite to determine whether the region should
>>> > belong
>>> > to India or Pakistan, both of which claim Kashmir in full.
>>> >
>>> > "These results support the already widespread view that the plebiscite
>>> > options are likely to offer no solution to the dispute," said the
>>> > survey,
>>> > which was released by the London-based Chatham House think-tank.
>>> >
>>> > Titled "Kashmir: Paths to Peace", it was a rare attempt to assess the
>>> > opinions of people on both sides of the Line of Control (LOC) -- the de
>>> > facto border that splits the region between the two rival nations.
>>> >
>>> > "Any solution will depend on the Indian and Pakistani governments?
>>> > commitment to achieving a permanent settlement," Bradnock said.
>>> > The survey interviewed about 3,800 people to record their views on how
>>> > they
>>> > saw the future of Kashmir -- a scenic region that has been a constant
>>> > source
>>> > of tension between India and Pakistan.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > But in the Hindu-dominated Jammu region -- which is also part of Indian
>>> > Kashmir -- support for independence dwindled to less than one percent.
>>> > The survey found that the "overwhelming majority" of people wanted a
>>> > solution to the dispute, even though there were no "simple fixes".
>>> > More than 47,000 people have died in Indian Kashmir since the eruption
>>> > of
>>> > the insurgency in 1989.
>>> >
>>> > India and Pakistan have fought two of their three wars over Kashmir, but
>>> > a
>>> > recent peace process has brought a reduction in violence.
>>> >
>>> > _________________________________________
>>> > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
>>> > Critiques & Collaborations
>>> > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>>> > subscribe in the subject header.
>>> > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>>> > List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> http://indersalim.livejournal.com
>>> _________________________________________
>>> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
>>> Critiques & Collaborations
>>> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>>> subscribe in the subject header.
>>> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>>> List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://indersalim.livejournal.com
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>
>



-- 

http://indersalim.livejournal.com


More information about the reader-list mailing list