[Reader-list] PSEUDO SECULARISTS NOW OPPOSING AYODHYA JUDGEMENT

[yasir ~يا سر]

janambhoomi babri mosque decision dividing rights to contested space

like in mumbai, roja films: we are after all hindustanis first, cant we all
just get along...

meanwhile there's babri and gujarat massacres
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AhbyGeTIbQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEG0D3FmgbU

in fact this is exactly what hashim ansari says at one point in 2009. the
point where one gives up contesting in favour of reasoned compromise:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO_Nnf0Qprg
(says its pressure from groups not just the case,...)

This is the reasoned, considered public opinion and coincidentally judgment
of the court.

it is all mixed up, each string pulls out others in Industan

significant examples
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2010/09/20/midday2/?refid=0
listen to after 31:00 to 45:00 which is the last part (5) of the audio talk
re US SC & public opinion

or see conclusion, p24
http://www.unc.edu/~pcwohlf/sc_ajps_fin.pdf

its always there.

best



On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:00 PM, cashmeeri <cashmeeri at yahoo.com> wrote:

> yasir
>
> "It is also customary for judges to decide considering 'public opinion' "
>
> customary?
>
> could you please give some significant examples of this contention
>
> ......... aalok aima
>
>
> --- On *Sun, 10/10/10, yasir ~يا سر <yasir.media at gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: yasir ~يا سر <yasir.media at gmail.com>
>
> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] PSEUDO SECULARISTS NOW OPPOSING AYODHYA
> JUDGEMENT
> To: "Sarai Reader-list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
> Date: Sunday, October 10, 2010, 12:19 AM
>
>
> It is also customary for judges to decide considering 'public opinion', in
> this case the highly politicised public opinion of the dominating majority.
> Its how they eventually balance the evidence, lack of it, and how the court
> wants its judgement to be received, what consequences it wants to see,
> these
> are also part of the judgement. a judgement may or may not be truth. Its
> where one stands and makes a call.
>
> btw is there a detailed judgement yet. and are there any dissenting judges.
> how does that work in India.
>
> best
>
>
>