[Reader-list] Hi

Sun Sep 19 16:21:28 IST 2010

Dear Dhatri,

I stay in Vadodara of Gujarat. If you are ever passing by this town, drop a
line on my inbox.

Thanks for your invitation.

Anupam

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:03 PM, we wi <dhatr1i at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Dear Anupam,
>
>       Hmm that's cool.  What about a coffee or a lunch or a dinner?  :P
>
> P:S :-  I am not a female.
>
> Regards,
> Dhatri.
>
>
> --- On Sun, 9/19/10, anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] Once dead can born somewhere in some form(atma)
> To: "we wi" <dhatr1i at yahoo.com>, "sarai list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
> Date: Sunday, September 19, 2010, 3:44 PM
>
> Dear Dhatri,
>
> I refuse to continue the discussion with you. Thank you very much for your
> time and replies.
>
> Regards
>
> Anupam
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:40 PM, we wi <dhatr1i at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Anupam,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>        That's very smart answer and very
>
> mystical.  Anyway By quoting the name Buddha you mean the founder of
>
> Buddhism I suppose. Before enlightenment and become Buddha, he is a HINDU
>
> Kshatriya prince.  He had parents, wife and a child and then people. But
>
> "Buddha" is so sensitive to escape from his responsibilities to find
>
> a permanent solution to old and death.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> How he escaped from the responsibilities?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     1. He should perform the "tarpana or sradha
>
> kriyas" to his parents so that they can
>
> reach the "punya
>
> lokas".  But he didn't.
>
>
>
>     2. The four Asramas or orders of life are
>
>  "Brahmacharya(unmarried)","Grihastha(married)",
>
> "Vanaprastha(old)"
>
>  and "Sannyasa(reluctant about
>
> everything except moksha)".  Anyone can attain    the moksha (free from all
> miseries or troubles) after
>
> passing through these phases of life in a chain of birth and death.   But
> "Buddha" left (not like the words
>
> exploited, cheated ...) his wife in middle and preferred sannyasa.
>
>
>
>     3. Child may not be orphan but he also fell in the trap and
>
> followed Buddhism there by turning down the hopes of
>
> mother and grandparents and the people.
>
>
>
>     4.  Anybody can become a ruler but every ruler can't be
>
> a king.  Only Kshatriya can be chosen as kings because they will never turn
> their
>
> back till the end. It is a Kshatriya duty to protect the people living in
>
> the kingdom.  He is responsible
>
>  for all the mistakes (his own or
>
> people).  So however good he was a king must
>
>  experience (visit) the NARAK after
>
> the death whether it is natural or war based. Based on sin and virtue one
> can secure a
>
> place in SWARG. Spending time in either swarg or narak (not just a king but
> anybody)
>
> can attain a moksha after several lives
>
>  based on their karma (sin or
>
> virtue). Now as a prince
>
>
>
>         it’s "Buddha" duty to know
>
> the problems of the people and resolving them. There is absolutely nothing
> wrong in it. But
>
> illness, old, and death are the forms of life not just for humans but any
> living being.
>
> Being a prince he can make a poor into rich, he can give a better treatment
> to the
>
> illness.  It is the duty of the king.  Instead of that the prince ran-out
> of life and ruined everything.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> P: S: - There are not so many castes and religions exist at that time when
>
> "Buddha" lived. Whatever "Buddha" found is very much there in Hindu
> religion.  The enlightenment didn't meat the eradication of old and death.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Dhatri.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 9/19/10, anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com>
>
> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] Reader-list: an open discussion list on media
> and the city Critiques & Collaborations
>
> To: "we wi" <dhatr1i at yahoo.com>, "sarai list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
>
> Date: Sunday, September 19, 2010, 1:28 PM
>
>
>
> Dear Dhatri,
>
>
>
> i am very small fry here dhatri. but even a certain individual who we refer
> to buddha was silent when asked about a way. but i can give you a clue
> though: how about looking inwards.i hope it helps. i hope i am not trying to
> sound very mystical :P
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks anupam
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:24 PM, we wi <dhatr1i at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear Anupam Chakravarhy,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       I posted what I know without exaggeration and there is nothing wrong
> in it about culture,religion,territory by looking at the provocative
> messages on this list.  Your view about me is totally baseless because it is
> made up with assumptions and guesses.   If you know much about religion not
> just hinduism etc., then please go ahead and write your postings.  If
> everybody took my messages so light then why should you worry so much and
> feel it so depth?  If anybody feel that somebody is going in wrong way then
> they should show the right way not just saying "this is not the way".
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Dhatri.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 9/19/10, anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com>
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] Reader-list: an open discussion list on media
> and the city Critiques & Collaborations
>
>
>
> To: "we wi" <dhatr1i at yahoo.com>, "sarai list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
>
>
>
> Date: Sunday, September 19, 2010, 12:57 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Dhatri,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I sincerely hope that you understand the word patience, peace first before
> you start advising others. I did not find any one else' post disturbing as
> yours because you were trying desperately to provoke. I guess most of the
> readers do not even take you seriously.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Anupam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:32 PM, we wi <dhatr1i at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Anupam,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It is good to know that you are reading messages.  But only my
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> messages
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> are so disturbing?  or the content as a whole and postings
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> of
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> this forum are disturbing?.  I didn’t say I knew everything about anything
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> but
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I posted criticism against sarcastic nature of the messages but never
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> abused.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If you know anything better then you are open to post about
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> it
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> with a signature "BEST ANUPAM" thereby giving your contribution to
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> INDIA,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> instead
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> of saying ‘SORRY’ by keeping in view of I quote
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> “>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city Critiques &
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Collaborations”.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> forum has already become a fish market with anti-Indian,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Anti-national,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> anti-cultural, anti-democratic, anti-secular, anti-patriotic
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Anti-Hindu postings.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If nobody feel they are rubbish then how can my
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> messages
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> are so rubbish and disturbing?   I request you don’t assume
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Anything. Under my freedom of speech,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> rights etc., and your opinion
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> linked
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> to it with condemnation I will not approach any court, human
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> right
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> organization like amnesty etc., like most of the country men
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> doing
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> not just in one area in the name of this and that now a days.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> request you to teach PATIENCE to the population so that everybody
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> can
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> live in peace not approaching courts, human rights etc., under
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> this
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> n that for every reason.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ANYWAY
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I NOTICED YOU POINT "NOT THIS WAY”.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dhatri.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 9/14/10, anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] 3 IN 1 FESTIVAL SEASON
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: "sarai list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Tuesday, September 14, 2010, 7:00 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> dear we wi,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> i have been reading your replies on this forum. they are extremely
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> disturbing and your questions provoke me to say something really nasty to
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> you. however, over the time, i have learnt the ways of debating or
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> discussing anything on this forum. please do not turn this forum into a
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> market place.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> what i can sense from your replies is that you are some insecure zealot who
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> is out here to post rubbish. i have doubts about your knowledge or hinduism
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> or for that matter anything that you can contribute to this forum. i think
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> you have not understood anything about any religion, and it is your
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> impatience for not being the receptacle to a more freer form of knowledge
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> about self and god, which making you post such things. i am sorry that i am
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> assuming things on your behalf. i am not permitted to do so as every one
> has
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> the right to express but i am sure not this way.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> thanks Anupam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Critiques & Collaborations
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________
>
>
>
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
>
>
>
> Critiques & Collaborations
>
>
>
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>
>
>
> List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________
>
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
>
> Critiques & Collaborations
>
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
>
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>
> List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>