[Reader-list] Brainwashing the Corporate Way

A. Mani a.mani.cms at gmail.com
Sat Jun 25 03:16:17 IST 2011


Brainwashing the Corporate Way

by John Pilger

	
Global Research, June 24, 2011
JohnPilger.com


One of the most original and provocative books of the past decade is
Disciplined Minds by Jeff Schmidt (Rowman & Littlefield). “A critical
look at salaried professionals,” says the cover, “and the
soul-battering system that shapes their lives.” Its theme is
postmodern America but also applies to Britain, where the corporate
state has bred a new class of Americanised manager to run the private
and public sectors: the banks, the main parties, corporations,
important committees, the BBC.

Professionals are said to be meritorious and non-ideological. Yet, in
spite of their education, writes Schmidt, they think less
independently than non-professionals. They use corporate jargon –
“model”, “performance”, “targets”, “strategic oversight”. In
Disciplined Minds, Schmidt argues that what makes the modern
professional is not technical knowledge but “ideological discipline”.
Those in higher education and the media do “political work” but in a
way that is not seen as political. Listen to a senior BBC person
sincerely describe the nirvana of neutrality to which he or she has
risen. “Taking sides” is anathema; and yet the modern professional
knows never to challenge the “built-in ideology of the status quo”.
What matters is the "right attitude".

A key to training professionals is what Schmidt calls “assignable
curiosity”. Children are naturally curious, but along the way to
becoming a professional they learn that curiosity is a series of tasks
assigned by others. On entering training, students are optimistic and
idealistic. On leaving, they are “pressured and troubled” because they
realise that “the primary goal for many is getting compensated
sufficiently for sidelining their original goals”. I have met many
young people, especially budding journalists, who would recognise
themselves in this description. For no matter how indirect its effect,
the primary influence of professional managers is the extreme
political cult of money worship and inequality known as neoliberalism.

The ultimate professional manager is Bob Diamond, the CEO of Barclays
Bank in London, who got a £6.5m bonus in March. More than 200 Barclays
managers took home £554m in total last year. In January, Diamond told
the Commons Treasury select committee that “the time for remorse is
over”. He was referring to the £1trn of public money handed
unconditionally to corrupted banks by a Labour government whose
leader, Gordon Brown, had described such “financiers” as his personal
“inspiration”.

This was the final act of corporate coup d’état, now disguised by a
specious debate about “cuts” and a “national deficit”. The most humane
premises of British life are to be eliminated. The “value” of the cuts
is said to be £83bn, almost exactly the amount of tax legally avoided
by the banks and corporations. That the British public continues to
give the banks an additional annual subsidy of £100bn in free
insurance and guarantees – a figure that would fund the entire
National Health Service – is suppressed.

So, too, is the absurdity of the very notion of “cuts”. When Britain
was officially bankrupt following the Second World War, there was full
employment and some of its greatest public institutions, such as the
Health Service, were built. Yet “cuts” are managed by those who say
they oppose them and manufacture consent for their wider acceptance.
This is the role of the Labour Party’s professional managers.

In matters of war and peace, Schmidt’s disciplined minds promote
violence, death and mayhem on a scale still unrecognised in Britain.
In spite of damning evidence to the Chilcot inquiry by the former
intelligence chief Major General Michael Laurie, the “core business”
manager, Alastair Campbell, remains at large, as do all the other war
managers who toiled with Blair and at the Foreign Office to justify
and sell the beckoning bloodbath in Iraq.

The reputable media play a critical often subtle role. Frederick
Ogilvie, who succeeded the BBC’s founder, Lord Reith, as director
general, wrote that his goal was to turn the BBC into a “fully
effective instrument of war”. Ogilvie would have been delighted with
his 21st-century managers. In the run-up to the Iraq invasion, the
BBC’s coverage overwhelmingly echoed the government’s mendacious
position, as studies by the University of Wales and Media Tenor show.

However, the great Arab uprising cannot be easily managed, or
appropriated, with omissions and caveats, as an exchange on the BBC’s
Today programme on 16 May made clear. With his celebrated
professionalism, honed in corporate speeches, John Humphrys
interviewed a Palestinian spokesman, Husam Zomlot, following Israel’s
massacre of unarmed demonstrators on the 63rd anniversary of the
illegal expulsion of the Palestinian people from their homes.

    Humphrys: . . . it’s not surprising that Israel reacted the way it
did, is it?

    Zomlot: . . . I am very proud and glad [they were] peacefully
marching only to . . . really to draw attention to their 63-year
plight.

    Humphrys: But they did not march peacefully, that’s my point . . .

    Zomlot: None of them . . . was armed . . . [They were] opposed to
Israeli tanks and helicopters and F-16s. You cannot even start to
compare the violence . . . This is not a security matter . . . [the
Israelis] always fail to deal with such a purely political,
humanitarian, legal matter . . .

    Humphrys: Sorry to interrupt you there but . . . if I marched into
your house waving a club and throwing a stone at you then it would be
a security matter, wouldn’t it?

    Zomlot: I beg your pardon. According to the United Nations
Security Council resolutions, those people are marching to their
homes; they have the deeds of their homes; it’s their private
property. So let’s set the record right once and for all . . .

It was a rare moment. Setting the record straight is not a managerial “target”.

___________________________________________________________________________________



Best

A. Mani



-- 
A. Mani
ASL, CLC,  AMS, CMS
http://www.logicamani.co.cc


More information about the reader-list mailing list