[Reader-list] Middle Class Proletariat

[A. Mani]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27157

Occupy The World! To the Barricades Comrades?

by William Bowles


Four years ago in a Ministry of Defence Review, the Whitehall
Mandarins, more astutely than any so-called Lefty, determined the
following:

    “The Middle Class Proletariat — The middle classes could become a
revolutionary class, taking the role envisaged for the proletariat by
Marx. The globalization of labour markets and reducing levels of
national welfare provision and employment could reduce peoples’
attachment to particular states. The growing gap between themselves
and a small number of highly visible super-rich individuals might fuel
disillusion with meritocracy, while the growing urban under-classes
are likely to pose an increasing threat to social order and stability,
as the burden of acquired debt and the failure of pension provision
begins to bite. Faced by these twin challenges, the world’s
middle-classes might unite, using access to knowledge, resources and
skills to shape transnational processes in their own class interest.”
— ‘UK Ministry of Defence report, The DCDC Global Strategic Trends
Programme 2007-2036’ (Third Edition) p.96, March 2007

Yeah, I know, I'm always using this quote (I first used it four years
ago) but it illustrates the great intellectual divide between the
political class and the citizens they rule, including our Left, now
made so apparent by what the pundits are now calling the 'Occupy The
World' (OTW) movement. It seems that only our very own ruling class
foresaw OTW.

Dig a little deeper into OTW and we find that with a few exceptions,
there are no challenges to capitalism, mostly it's a 'clean up your
act' kinda thing. Throw a few billionaires in jail, add some
regulation and things will eventually turn out just fine. Dream on...

But we've been here before. This is what attempts at 'reforming'
capitalism in the past have looked like. We lived under such a system
from 1945 until the late 1970s, before the Empire reasserted itself,
proving once again, that concepts like 'democracy' under capitalism,
are at best, mere conveniences and so vague a concept that it can be
made to resemble almost anything.

And once the so-called Good Life that capitalism allegedly had offered
us started to wear thin and capitalism once more plunged us into war
and poverty, so too the 'Good Life' had to be dumped. Belt-tightening
time again.

But unlike 1968, or even the 'Anti-Globalization Movement' that some
are comparing OTW to, socialism is barely mentioned, let alone the
central motif. Yes, there are increasing anti-capitalist references
but in 1968, politics was at the very heart of the situation. It
wasn't about money but about posing a real alternative to capitalism.
The concept of belonging to a class still existed in the public's
consciousness, even if it lacked the collective will to do anything
about it.

Am I being altogether too cruel to OTW? It is after all, early days in
the development of OTW. It might all fizzle out or if it doesn't, the
political class might have to use the logical response to the MoD's
quote above: suppress it. Something for which, no doubt in another
(secret) report, the Whitehall Mandarins have laid out the strategy
and tactics to be employed in suppressing a burgeoning (socialist?)
revolution.

After all, when "[f]aced by th[o]se twin challenges, the world’s
middle-classes might unite, using access to knowledge, resources and
skills to shape transnational processes in their own class interest”,
says it all.

You have to take this stuff seriously! It's not a game and the state
is very adept at employing whatever tactics it chooses to suppress
serious dissent including the use of agents provocateurs (a
long-standing 'tradition') to infiltrate and provoke pointless
confrontations with the state, in order not only to justify
suppression but more importantly, as part of a propaganda war waged
through the media, where we have no counter-voice.

Repression of course carries its own risks and far from being a
solution could only further excerbate the problem. Timing is all. This
is not a game. The political class is fighting for its life and that
of its masters, the corporations. That's why they write those reports.
Just as with the insurrections earlier this year in the UK, the state
had a clear response to it and the role of the media was central to
its effectiveness in spreading the state's message.

Let it 'burn baby, burn' and turn the world's cameras onto the
conflagration, followed by a good dose of Victorian 'rough justice'
(pity they've abolished hard labour and deportation to Australia).
Make an example of them should anyone else have ideas about following
in their footsteps.

The key here is the observation made by the Whitehall Mandarins about
"class interests". Now if well-paid and no doubt loyal members of the
political class' intelligentsia have gotten it figured out (and so
far, their prediction is right on the money), how come the 'Left'
hasn't?

Currently class is something almost entirely absent from the OTW
movement. Without it eventually taking centre stage, OTW is bound to
be stillborn. But there are some positive signs that some kind of
'consensus' mechanism is emerging from the chaos akin to some kind of
'self-organizing' principle. After all, we have what the MoD report
called "access to knowledge, resources and skills" necessary to
produce workable alternatives not only to capitalism but to fashion a
new kind of inclusive democracy, one that hasn't existed before.

    The aim is to create a venue for democratic deliberation and open
debate in a place normally associated with secretive privilege. People
working in the City of London have played a starring role in creating
the global economic crisis. Since our representative institutions have
thus far failed to address this crisis in a way that is both sensible
and just, it is only fitting that we should use the City as a place in
which [to] work on solutions ourselves. -- 'Talk Amongst Yourselves'
By Dan Hind

It's not a 'peasants revolt' kinda thing, though of course inevitably
those hit the worst by the crisis will revolt first. But the crisis of
capital has now hit those who make up the very bedrock of capitalist
society's justification for existing, its so-called middle classes.
These are the major consumers in our economy, not only is their
consumption a major chunk of our GDP (as well its debt), they are also
the managers and technicians of capitalism and the state machine. Piss
them off and things could get out of hand just as the MoD has
predicted.

Some on the Left in the UK are still calling for revitalizing the
Labour Party as a potential force for socialism but if so, then it
means that it would have to come from its decimated grassroots
membership, a tall if not impossible order to carry out. At the first
signs of revolt in the Labour Party's constituency membership, the
Party Machine will intervene and purge its ranks just as it has done
so many times in the past.

For a Left largely pinning its hopes on a working class that no longer
exists, it will have to broaden and deepen its knowledge of how
capitalism has evolved and transformed the nature of the working class
and learn to seek connections to a much more diverse and complex
alliance of forces if we are to defeat the Empire.

What an irony that the Left—led largely by middle class
intellectuals—fails to see what has happened, trapped as it is in its
own patronizing and nostalgic vision of the working class aka George
'middle class' Orwell's 'Road to Wigan Pier'. And this is the problem:
it's always middle class intellectuals on the Left who have set the
agenda, not for their own 'class' mind but for an idea that emerged in
the middle of the 19th century; that the organized industrial working
class would undertake the Revolution, led of course by middle class
intellectuals.

OTW is nevertheless a transcendent moment, one to cherish and sustain
and no doubt just the first shot across the bows of Global Capital but
for it to have a chance of success it will have challenge corporate
capitalism's right to exist.

To do this we will first have to dispel the 'bad apple' theory as the
cause of the current crisis. That it's just a question of regulating
capitalism, smoothing out the rough edges, eliminating the extremes
and above all, restoring 'competition', so-called real capitalism.

But this could only be done by breaking up the giant corporations and
abolishing the financial sector in its entirety as it currently
exists. Is it likely that advocates of 'real' capitalism aka Max
Keisser could undertake such a mission? The way I understand it, a
'real' capitalist economy would consist only of small competing
private businesses, cooperatives, public utilities and the
self-employed, and one assumes massive state intervention in order to
make it all happen.

Sounds a bit like my favourite kind of socialism, William Morris's
version and not an overly ambitious objective given the political will
to carry it out.

But who will break up Shell or Goldman Sachs? Who will smash the
military-industrial-media complex? Only a state owned and managed by
the working class can undertake such a momentous task. OTY OTW...

___________________________________________________________________________


Best

A. Mani



-- 
A. Mani
CU, ASL, CLC,  AMS, CMS
http://www.logicamani.co.cc