[Reader-list] [Caution: Message contains Redirect URL content] Fwd: pilger on mandela

Thu Dec 12 11:47:50 CST 2013

Slavoj Zizek Raises a similar point here -> http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/if-nelson-mandela-really-had-won

Guneet
--
Web Developer & Co-Founder at Sputznik
+91 971 766 4996
LinkedIn

On , Nagraj Adve <nagraj.adve at gmail.com> wrote:

To me, the most imp issue is not Mandela but the one you mention Vijay, the
constraints that capital puts on even the most radical movements when they
threaten to come to power, or do come to power. Because what happened in SA
after transition can happen elsewhere, it is sobering.
Naga

On 12 December 2013 19:24, Prashad, Vijay <Vijay.Prashad at trincoll.edu>wrote:

> Thanks for sending this along Naga.
>
> I find this essay to be characteristically wooden. The ending is
> malicious, of Mandela getting into "silver Mercedes." What did he expect
> him to get into? Was Mandela expected to walk…the long road to freedom?
>
> The section on the "deal" is very badly done, showing that Mandela was
> someone on the sell-out wing of the ANC. That is very wrong, and Pilger
> should know better. There was consensus on the direction that was to come
> in the ANC, with the main holdouts at that time (1990-96) being the more
> left-wing people in the ANC (mainly SACP members). With the assassination
> of Chris Hani in 1993, the left-wing lost its standard. It was a very
> shocking moment for Mandela as well — Chris was the leader of the left
> outside the prisons who had been a mainstay in Umkhonto we Sizwe and was
> the most beloved leader, without equal, in the townships. The assassination
> of Hani had a long-standing impact on the SACP, which has never recovered,
> and therefore on the ANC. Pilger makes the whole thing sound sordid.
>
> A good spur to write something in opposition to all these essays (Pilger,
> Patrick Bond and so on) that somehow pin the "blame" on people like Mandela
> without giving us a sense of the changed world environment in the early
> 1990s, the killing of the left-wing in South Africa and the constraints on
> the country by the stranglehold of international capital. Could Mandela
> have become a Chavez? Stupid question. 1990 was not 2000 — globalization
> was still on the ascendency at the start of the decade, and had lost its
> shine for Latin America at least by the early 2000s.
>
> Vijay.
>
> From: Nagraj Adve <nagraj.adve at gmail.com<mailto:nagraj.adve at gmail.com>>
> Date: Thursday, December 12, 2013 1:49 PM
> To: 'Rajesh gupta' <rajeshnamesake at gmail.com<mailto:
> rajeshnamesake at gmail.com>>, Ranjana <ranjanapadhi at yahoo.co.uk<mailto:
> ranjanapadhi at yahoo.co.uk>>, rajender negi <negirs0101 at yahoo.co.in<mailto:
> negirs0101 at yahoo.co.in>>, Arunesh Maiyar <arunesh_maiyar at yahoo.com<mailto:
> arunesh_maiyar at yahoo.com>>, debaranjan sarangi <debasar11 at yahoo.co.in
> <mailto:debasar11 at yahoo.co.in>>, "
> reading-capital-in-shadipur at googlegroups.com<mailto:
> reading-capital-in-shadipur at googlegroups.com>" <
> reading-capital-in-shadipur at googlegroups.com<mailto:
> reading-capital-in-shadipur at googlegroups.com>>, Sarai <
> reader-list at sarai.net<mailto:reader-list at sarai.net>>, Sinha Amitabh <
> recoamit at gmail.com<mailto:recoamit at gmail.com>>
> Subject: [Caution: Message contains Redirect URL content] Fwd: pilger on
> mandela
>
> Subject: pilger on mandela
>
>
> From Apartheid to Neoliberalism in South Africa, Mandela’s Tarnished Legacy
>
> by JOHN PILGER
>
> When I reported from South Africa in the 1960s, the Nazi admirer Johannes
> Vorster occupied the prime minister’s residence in Cape Town. Thirty years
> later, as I waited at the gates, it was as if the guards had not changed.
> White Afrikaners checked my ID with the confidence of men in secure work.
> One carried a copy of Long Walk to Freedom, Nelson Mandela’s autobiography.
> “It’s very eenspirational,” he said.
>
> Mandela had just had his afternoon nap and looked sleepy; his shoelaces
> were untied. Wearing a bright gold shirt, he meandered into the room.
> “Welcome back,” said the first president of a democratic South Africa,
> beaming. “You must understand that to have been banned from my country is a
> great honour.” The sheer grace and charm of the man made you feel good. He
> chuckled about his elevation to sainthood. “That’s not the job I applied
> for,” he said drily. Still, he was well used to deferential interviews and
> I was ticked off several times – “you completely forgot what I said” and “I
> have already explained that matter to you”. In brooking no criticism of the
> African National Congress (ANC), he revealed something of why millions of
> South Africans will mourn his passing but not his “legacy”.
>
> I had asked him why the pledges he and the ANC had given on his release
> from prison in 1990 had not been kept. The liberation government, Mandela
> had promised, would take over the apartheid economy, including the banks –
> and “a change or modification of our views in this regard is
> inconceivable”. Once in power, the party’s official policy to end the
> impoverishment of most South Africans, the Reconstruction and Development
> Programme (RDP), was abandoned, with one of his ministers boasting that the
> ANC’s politics were Thatcherite.
>
> “You can put any label on it if you like,” he replied. “ …but, for this
> country, privatisation is the fundamental policy.”
>
> “That’s the opposite of what you said in 1994.”
>
> “You have to appreciate that every process incorporates a change.”
>
> Few ordinary South Africans were aware that this “process” had begun in
> high secrecy more than two years before Mandela’s release when the ANC in
> exile had, in effect, done a deal with prominent members of the Afrikaaner
> elite at meetings in a stately home, Mells Park House, near Bath. The prime
> movers were the corporations that had underpinned apartheid.
>
> Around the same time, Mandela was conducting his own secret negotiations.
> In 1982, he had been moved from Robben Island to Pollsmoor Prison, where he
> could receive and entertain people. The apartheid regime’s aim was to split
> the ANC between the “moderates” they could “do business with” (Mandela,
> Thabo Mbeki and Oliver Tambo) and those in the frontline townships who led
> the United Democratic Front (UDF). On 5 July, 1989, Mandela was spirited
> out of prison to meet P.W. Botha, the white minority president known as the
> Groot Krokodil (Big Crocodile). Mandela was delighted that Botha poured the
> tea.
>
> With democratic elections in 1994, racial apartheid was ended, and
> economic apartheid had a new face. During the 1980s, the Botha regime had
> offered black businessmen generous loans, allowing them set up companies
> outside the Bantustans. A new black bourgeoisie emerged quickly, along with
> a rampant cronyism. ANC chieftains moved into mansions in “golf and country
> estates”. As disparities between white and black narrowed, they widened
> between black and black.
>
> The familiar refrain that the new wealth would “trickle down” and “create
> jobs” was lost in dodgy merger deals and “restructuring” that cost jobs.
> For foreign companies, a black face on the board often ensured that nothing
> had changed. In 2001, George Soros told the Davos Economic Forum, “South
> Africa is in the hands of international capital.”
>
> In the townships, people felt little change and were subjected to
> apartheid-era evictions; some expressed nostalgia for the “order” of the
> old regime. The post-apartheid achievements in de-segregating daily life in
> South Africa, including schools, were undercut by the extremes and
> corruption of a “neoliberalism” to which the ANC devoted itself. This led
> directly to state crimes such as the massacre of 34 miners at Marikana in
> 2012, which evoked the infamous Sharpeville massacre more than half a
> century earlier. Both had been protests about injustice.
>
> Mandela, too, fostered crony relationships with wealthy whites from the
> corporate world, including those who had profited from apartheid. He saw
> this as part of “reconciliation”. Perhaps he and his beloved ANC had been
> in struggle and exile for so long they were willing to accept and collude
> with the forces that had been the people’s enemy. There were those who
> genuinely wanted radical change, including a few in the South African
> Communist Party, but it was the powerful influence of mission Christianity
> that may have left the most indelible mark. White liberals at home and
> abroad warmed to this, often ignoring or welcoming Mandela’s reluctance to
> spell out a coherent vision, as Amilcar Cabral and Pandit Nehru had done.
>
> Ironically, Mandela seemed to change in retirement, alerting the world to
> the post 9/11 dangers of George W. Bush and Tony Blair. His description of
> Blair as “Bush’s foreign minister” was mischievously timed; Thabo Mbeki,
> his successor, was about to arrive in London to meet Blair. I wonder what
> he would make of the recent “pilgrimage” to his cell on Robben Island by
> Barack Obama, the unrelenting jailer of Guantanamo.
>
> Mandela seemed unfailingly gracious. When my interview with him was over,
> he patted me on the arm as if to say I was forgiven for contradicting him.
> We walked to his silver Mercedes, which consumed his small grey head among
> a bevy of white men with huge arms and wires in their ears. One of them
> gave an order in Afrikaans and he was gone.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Reading Capital in Shadipur" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reading-capital-in-shadipur+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com<mailto:
> reading-capital-in-shadipur+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Reading Capital in Shadipur" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reading-capital-in-shadipur+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
_________________________________________
reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
Critiques & Collaborations
To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in the subject header.
To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>