[Reader-list] Fwd: Hype vs reality

Wed May 1 07:40:47 CDT 2013

Thank you Mr. Bidwai for writing such a masterpiece of ‘Secular thoughts’. 

You have enlightened me on many things, e.g. – True secularism means,
(1)   CALLING 2002 Gujrat riots ( in which 300 Hindus have also lost lives) as POGROM. 
(2)     IGNORING the fact that first Godhra happened  then riots followed
(3)     ACCEPTING Muslims’ right to retaliate but now allowing Hindus to even defend themselves. Etc. etc. list is very long !

I understood from your beautiful article that Gujratis are idiots who voted for this useless leader three times in succession, because they can’t understand the difference between ‘true’ progress and ‘fake’ progress. Unfortunately Mr. Bidwai, no. of such type of idiots is day by day increasing very fast in India. It is vindicated by the fact that Modi’ speeches fetch maximum TRP. Commercial forces have taken over media in India, and  TV channels are compelled  by Modi’s growing popularity ( not by business houses as mentioned by you ) to show live coverage of his speeches.

That Democracy is useless - in which decisions are taken very very slowly ( or not taken atall), development happens with snail’s pace, progress is always derailed by vested interests of corrupt politicians. 

This democracy is useless - in which supporting a Hindu cause is termed as communalism.

We don’t need this democracy, we don’t need this type of secularism which does not allow seculars like you to condemn Pakistan govt. or civil society for Sarabjit Singh’s plight.

Voting for non corrupt, autocrat Narendra Bhai Modi as a Prime Minister is the need of the hour. Modi addresses people directly, enjoys common man’s confidence and does not allow anybody’s selfish motives to puncture the development process. He cares for ‘ All 6 crore’ Gujratis. He does not form ‘Sacchar committees’ to separate out Muslims to divide and rule the society.  

I am puzzled from where you have got those ‘Numbers’ regarding Gujrat’s progress. If hese ‘Numbers’ are to be believed then we must say that all those business houses, industrialists, independent organizations (including Rajiv Gandhi Trust) who keep praising NaMo model of development are fools.

Only these conclusions  can be drawn from your writing that either ‘Modi Bashing’ is giving you lot of fortune ( here I remember confession given by Yoginder Sikand) 
OR 
you are economically and mathematically illiterate and mentally bankrupt.  

--- On Mon, 29/4/13, Asit Das <asit1917 at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Asit Das <asit1917 at gmail.com>
Subject: [Reader-list] Fwd: Hype vs reality
To: "reader-list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
Date: Monday, 29 April, 2013, 9:09 AM

http://www.thedailystar.net/beta2/news/hype-vs-reality/

SUNDAY, APRIL 14, 2013*PRAFUL BIDWAI COLUMN* Hype vs reality PRAFUL BIDWAI

MODI moves centre-stage!” “Modi storms in as the BJP’s PM candidate.” “It’s
Narendra Modi vs Rahul Gandhi!” “In PM mode, Modi spells out strategy on
big issues.”

Thus scream the headlines in leading Indian publications and TV channels —
part of a systematic corporate blitzkrieg to build up Gujarat Chief
Minister Narendra Modi as a messiah of “development,” who is destined to
lead India.

In contrast to this hype, unprecedented in Indian history, Mr. Modi remains
a deeply polarising figure internationally, nationally, and even within the
Sangh Parivar, which is reluctant to name him as its prime ministerial
candidate. Nothing can remove the stigma he carries for Independent India’s
worst anti-minority pogrom, in 2002.

Mr. Modi continues to be an abomination to conscientious citizens globally
— and to millions of Hindus and non-Hindus in India, who treasure political
decency, secularism, tolerance and social inclusion.

This was once again demonstrated by the spirited protest against the
invitation extended to him by Wharton Business School at the University of
Pennsylvania in the US to speak long-distance. The issue was not the right
to free expression, but hate speech and sanctification of his pivotal role
in the Gujarat butchery. The protest conforms with the ethos and culture of
US universities, evident in their opposition to the Vietnam War and
demonstrations against its apologists.

In contrast stands the lionising of Mr. Modi by Indian businessmen and the
corporate media. They depict him as a Knight in Shining Armour who will
rescue India from economic stagnation, poverty, and missed opportunities
towards “progress,” and promote the “Gujarat Model” of development.

Politically, it would be wrong, and morally impermissible, to normalise a
perverse, autocratic and crassly communal politician like Mr. Modi — who
has covered up the 2002 violence and shielded its perpetrators — even if
the “Gujarat Model” were worth emulating.

However, the model is deeply flawed. Gujarat’s rank in per capita GDP has
fallen since 1996-97 from 4th to 8th among 19 major Indian states. Haryana,
Punjab, Maharashtra, Kerala and Himachal Pradesh are ahead of it. Tamil
Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka are only a notch below.

True, at 10.1% a year, Gujarat’s GDP growth in 2004-2012 exceeded the 8.3%
national average. But growth was even higher in Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and
Bihar (respectively, 10.8, 10.3 and 11.4%). Even Uttarakhand and Madhya
Pradesh have recently outperformed Gujarat.

Madhya Pradesh, with 10.1% current growth, is India’s fastest-growing
state. It posted impressive agricultural growth of 18.9% and 14.3% over two
years. Since 2003-04, MP’s revenue collection has risen fivefold and its
capital outlay sixfold.

Unlike Gujarat’s “trickle-down” approach, MP is state-interventionist in
providing food and electricity. Its growth is also more balanced and
inclusive — unlike Gujarat’s, which has neglected agriculture and the
social sector. Gujarat’s industrial growth is unbalanced, dominated by
sectors like toxic chemicals production, ship breaking and diamond
polishing, and of late, polluting power generation. Gujarat’s agriculture,
on which 52% of its people depend, is unstable. Food grain output recently
suffered two sharp dips of 22% and 11%.

Gujarat isn’t as great a foreign direct investment (FDI) magnet as made
out. Maharashtra, Delhi, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu attracted much more FDI
in 2000-2012 — in Maharashtra’s case, 6.78 times more.

Gujarat’s recent growth is largely built on past gains in industry and
infrastructure, but is not bad. But its human development index (HDI) story
is poor. Its all-India HDI rank has fallen from six to nine. It ranks a
poor 18th in literacy among Indian states.

In infant mortality, Gujarat is a low 25th. Its female infant mortality
rate (51) is higher than the national average (46). Worse, its sex ratio is
an abysmal 918 females per 1,000 males, well below the national ratio
(940). The 0-6 sex ratio is a shameful 886, compared to 914 nationally —
27th lowest in India.

In poverty reduction (8.6 percentage-points between 2004 and 2009), Gujarat
lags behind Tamil Nadu (13.1), Maharashtra (13.7), Odisha (19.2) or Madhya
Pradesh (11.9). Employment has been almost stagnant in Gujarat since
2004-05. Less than 5% of Gujarati households are covered under the National
Rural Employment Guarantee. Rural wage rates in Gujarat are among the
bottom half of state rankings.

On the hunger index, Gujarat’s rank is an appalling 13 among 17 major
Indian states. Even sub-Saharan Africa’s poorer countries do better. Nearly
45% of Gujarati children under five are malnourished. Gujarat’s hunger
incidence exceeds that of Punjab, Kerala and Haryana, and even of much
poorer Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and Rajasthan. It’s in the “acute hunger”
league like Bihar and Orissa.

So much for Gujarat’s growth and “progress”! Gujarat has gaping economic
inequalities and unacceptably poor social indices. Yet, Big Business loves
the “Gujarat Model” precisely because it likes imbalances biased towards
private industry and because Mr. Modi favours it with huge tax write-offs
(for instance, over 60% on the Tatas’ Nano project).

Mr. Modi is a “man of action” — an autocratic quick decision-maker
personifying single-window industrial approvals. Big Business adores him
for his ruthless decisiveness. The Tatas, Ambanis, Adanis and Ruias have
rushed to befriend and praise him.

The media reflects businessmen’s admiration for Mr. Modi. Instead of
soberly reporting what he says and does, and reflecting on his
authoritarian politics, it has joined the pro-Modi bandwagon. It gives him
respectability and paints him as the winner in a presidential-style
contest, which Indian elections aren’t.

The mediating factor here is the “aspirational” metropolitan upper-caste
upper middle class, which is impatient with democracy and wants elitist
approaches in economy and society. If that means welcoming a new fuehrer,
so be it!

The corporate media’s owners, anchors and editors belong to this class. In
promoting Mr. Modi, they are committing the same blunders that Hitler’s and
Mussolini’s business backers made in the 1920s and 1930s.

They are only aggravating the grave threat that Indian democracy faces from
the communal Extreme-Right.

*The writer is an eminent Indian columinst.*
*E-mail: bidwai at bol.net.in*

-- 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Samuhik-Khoj" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to samuhik-khoj+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
_________________________________________
reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
Critiques & Collaborations
To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in the subject header.
To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>