[Reader-list] PLANTS FRAMES AND FALSE IMPLICATIONS

[Asit Das]

POLITICS <http://www.dailyo.in/opinion/section/1.html>  |  STORIES UNSCENE  |
  7-minute read
ARUN FERREIRA AND VERNON GONSALVES
<http://www.dailyo.in/user/105/storiesunscene> @storiesunscene
<http://twitter.com/StoriesUnscene>

[image: "]Laxman Jangu Madavi was one of the many young Gond tribal men and
women charged with 'terrorist' crimes whom we met while we were
incarcerated in Nagpur Central prison. Brought in from villages of the
"left-wing extremism" affected districts of Gadchiroli and Gondia, they had
common stories of illegal detention, torture and false implication in the
many violent incidents that occur in these districts. Laxman however was
one of the few, who not only were falsely implicated in existing offences,
but also had a crime invented and fabricated by the police just in order to
implicate them.

Laxman being the silent stoic type it took some days after he came to jail
for him to come out with his short and simple story. It seems he had had
some earlier relation with the Naxalite movement and had gone before the
police to give himself up. The police however, despite all government
proclamations to the contrary, did not need surrenders. They preferred to
show capture, with associated narratives of bravery and claims of awards.
So they detained him for ten days and then cooked up a story of a chase in
the jungle and arrest of Laxman Madavi, a "dreaded terrorist"; they showed
seizures of a gun, cartridges and explosives and prepared a report of an
offence and registered an FIR. When shown to be arrested and produced in
court, Laxman had no idea of this "crime" he was supposed to have
committed. It was only when, some months later, he was served a copy of his
chargesheet that he came to know of this fantastic story. This was in 2008.

Almost six years later, in fact just a few days ago, Laxman was acquitted
by an Order the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court dated 23rd July,
2014. Since the only "witnesses" to his "chase and capture" were police
personnel, and since the trial court had believed their story, Laxman had
been convicted. It was only after appeal to the High Court, that the High
Court judge managed to catch the apparent lies of the witnesses. He ordered
Laxman's acquittal stating, 'The plea of the appellant that he had
surrendered before the Police and he has been implicated in a false case
later on cannot be rejected in view of the unreliable evidence of the
prosecution witnesses.'[image: width=]

But this recognition that Laxman had been implicated in a false case came a
bit late. He had already served out his prison sentence. The only purpose
left in the judgment was to clear him of the stigma of conviction.

Similar is the case of Bamu Deva Micha, whom we met in jail in 2010 as an
ever-smiling teenager. An orphan, he had been left to shuttle from one
relative to another throughout his childhood. On one such trip he was
accosted by a police squad, who not only arrested him and showed a muzzle
loader gun to be seized from him, but also made up a story that he had
fired on them from it, thus accusing him of an attempt to murder them. He
too was convicted by the Sessions Court and was only set free by the High
Court.

In his case, the High Court Judgment dated 10th July, 2013 observed that,
'The weapon appeared to have been planted on the appellant.' Analysing the
evidence of the prosecution, it pointed out that it 'gives clear impression
that the appellant has been framed in this case.' It concluded 'The
loopholes found in the prosecution case make it certain that the
prosecution case is manipulated against the appellant and he has been
framed in this case.'

If you feel that the cases of Laxman and Bamu are exceptions and framing
and false implication do not generally take place, you can think again.
Some of the biggest criminal cases in recent times have seen the
investigating agencies fabricating and concocting evidence to falsely
implicate innocent persons. Well-known is the case of the 26/11 attack on
Mumbai, where an attempt was made to fabricate evidence to implicate two
accused, Fahim Ansari and Sabauddin, for conspiracy in the attacks. This
evidence was rejected at the Sessions Court itself and confirmed by High
Court as well as the Supreme Court.

Three months ago came the Supreme Court Judgment dated 16th May, 2013 in
the case of the attack on the Akshardham temple in Gandhinagar of September
2002, which not only acquitted all the accused, but also found that the
whole case against them was fabricated and concocted. It stated, '...we
fear that the story against the accused persons and its corroboration
through the statements of accomplices is an act of concoction to make up a
case against them', and it concluded that '…there was a serious attempt on
the part of the investigating agency to fabricate a case against the
accused persons and frame them with the help of the statements of the
accomplices, since they had not been able to solve the case even after
almost a year of the incidence.' [Para 96]. It took note of 'the perversity
in conducting this case at various stages' [Para 131] and expressed anguish
over the way in which 'the investigating agencies conducted the
investigation of the case of such a grievous nature, involving the
integrity and security of the Nation. Instead of booking the real culprits
responsible for taking so many precious lives, the police caught innocent
people and got imposed the grievous charges against them which resulted in
their conviction and subsequent sentencing.' [Para 136]

[image: width=]

The conclusions of the Supreme Court thus mean: The Akshardham accused are
innocent. They spent almost eleven years in jail for no fault of theirs.
They suffered because the police framed them just to create a false
impression that they had solved the case.

This also means that the real conspirators were never identified. It is now
almost twelve years after the attack and the investigation has been buried.
There is thus almost no possibility that the actual perpetrators will ever
be known.

Fabrication and false implication is thus a very serious crime. One would
expect that the guilty officers would be penalised. But there has been no
significant case where such officers have been even probed or prosecuted,
leave aside punished.
#Illegal detention <http://www.dailyo.in/tag/illegal-detention/1/326.html>
#Naxalism <http://www.dailyo.in/tag/naxalism/1/322.html> #Maoist
<http://www.dailyo.in/tag/maoist/1/318.html>

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors
and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of DailyO.in
or the India Today Group. The writers are solely responsible for any claims
arising out of the contents of this article.