[Reader-list] Re: West Bengal-MS tie up
Ravikant
ravikant at sarai.net
Fri Aug 10 03:02:13 IST 2001
The postings on the WB-MS tie-up have confirmed my fears about the
desperation the FS community feels. The desperation emerges from a sense of
rootlessness, for the community does not show the vitality its passion should
have revealed and generated.
I am with Shuddha's critique of the state, with Joy's frustration about the
lack of linux efforts in the language domain, with Jeebesh's appeal to
refresh the roots and Steef's futuristic optimism with regard to MS
collapsing under its own weight. And Raju's gesture makes me sad.
Here is why:
While pointing fingers at others' amnesia and refusal to learn from history,
we must recall our own. Knowledge and Power have been inextricably linked,
colonialism should have taught us. Look at what happened to the communities
that relied too much on the state. Sanskrit was never a people's tongue, nor
was Persian. So, perehaps language can be seen as inhabiting a community and
Hindi language is another case in point. The real estrangement of the
language from the people did not come in the pre-independence period, though
the effort was made even then to gain access to the royal corridors. Hindi
becomes laughable only when it becomes the Rajbhasha (literally, the language
of the state). It looses characters like Malaviya who constructed a whole
university out of begging from the community. It looses its sense of purpose,
the will to freedom, and the sense of diversity and dignity. It becomes
dependent on the grants from the state in the guise of various Academies and
Rajbhasha Vibhags (depts). It creates a vocabulary nobody uses, a canon
everybody abhors, and a university pedagogy that has no more value than a
pastime. The reason why it survives is that there is a community of users
outside the narrow and wooden prisonhouse called nation-state. In the films,
for example. Or, in the numerous local, short-lived yet always proliferating,
world of small magazines (even after the big corporates like TOI and HT
withdrew their publications). With the net and the web it has found a new
energy, has witnessed an explosion of diverse creativity: the popular is
writing the code, as it were, with passionate discussions and a self-
consciously inclusivist mode of refashioning against the English-dominated
odds of the computer world. It could be true of other Indian languages.
The point is that the cyber-moment does provide an opportunity to disentangle
technology from the close historical association it has had with the state,
so much so that the two have been synonymous in popular memory. It was, and
still is, in the Free Software philosophy and history to rehabilitate
technology amongst the people, where it began its journey: remember the early
artefacts of the pre-state days? Or the origins of domestication of plants
and animals? When the state came and started owning technology, it created
machines of mass destruction. Needless to say,it also destroyed Freedom.
--
Ravikant
Sarai, CSDS
29, Rajpur Road, Delhi
More information about the reader-list
mailing list