[Reader-list] On technology(ies) and ...violence
jha sadan
jhasadan at hotmail.com
Fri Dec 20 13:19:53 IST 2002
On technoloy(ies) and...violence
Let me pose some of the most primitive questions related to
technology(ies)---'technologies for whom' and 'technologies for what'? I am
skeeping one obvious question--what is technology? These questions are for
beginners and I expect you not to pay any heed to them. One raise an eyebrow
over these questions only at the time of ones entry into 'the field'. One
gets satisfied with an answer or a set of answers and move to another level.
The tension acquires a different form. There is another dimension to the
problem. This line of thinking suggests that one does not get satisfied with
her/his answers but allows herself/himself to think that the question is
itself a futile one and questionning of this kind does not lead to
anywhere...And, one moves to another plain. These two approaches obviously
do not cover the range of possibilities for not paying attention to
primitive questions. The range is so wide and terrain is so rough that it
can even go upto responses such as, 'I do not care' or 'damn care!'.
'Are you a social activist/socialist/hypocrat?'
Laughter is the best way to unarm, to disorient or to simply destry an
urchin who ask these primitive questions.
'It reflects anxiety of a new comer who has not been indoctrinated in/by the
field', one argues politically.Phases of continious projection and negation
can be stretched on this line of denial.
'What(the hell)do you want to unearth? What the hell do wish to prove? For
whom ? For what purpose do you ask...(at all)?'
The anxiety to fix the location of the question and to fix the 'author'.
Fixed--Bracketed--Destroyed--Mission accomplished--Security
Imagined--Security Achieved--Violence negated.
I wish to listen first. My background motivates me listening. Tales of
violnce and technologies have been told and retold. Each generation has its
own story, its own lullabies. These lullabies are neccessary. They give ways
to selective amnesia. You forget the violence or locate it in lullabies so
that you can sleep well and can dream.Dreams not to remember but for goody
goody feelings in the morning.
Listening is also a kind of lullaby. I am listening because I have not
resolved the anxiety. I have not found any answer to these primitive
questions. I have not moved to another plain. Some people are condemned to
remain attached. They are stuck and can not move further, can not move
ahead.
But moving ahead in what direction? Development paradigms come into my mind
and I remember Gandhi and modernism and all those ('complex')words with a
constently inconsistent prefix, 'post'.
I choose Gandhi. He has a lot to offer on technology and violence. This is
also due to my ignorance as I have not come accross much on the technology
and violence. The ignorance is a bliss too. It helps in listening. It opens
up this epistemological landscape. The charm of the landscape keeps one
involved with primitiveness(of the question...violence...technology(ies).
Sadan Jha.
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 3 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=7474&SU=
http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_stopmorespam_3mf
More information about the reader-list
mailing list