[Reader-list] Muzamil Jaleel : The politics of condemnation
Harsh Kapoor
aiindex at mnet.fr
Sun Apr 13 09:25:21 IST 2003
The Indian Express
9 April 2003
http://www.expressindia.com/kashmir/full_story.php?content_id=21667
The politics of condemnation
Muzamil Jaleel
Two gory incidents shattered Kashmir's calm last month and pushed the
state back to the brink. The massacre of 24 Kashmiri Pandits in
Nadimarg where unidentified assassins arrived in the night, dragged
men, women, even infants and sprayed bullets.
Even a physically challenged girl was not spared. Two days later,
gunmen swooped on another village called Panihad in Poonch. They
barged into two houses, collecting men, women and children. They beat
them up and later chopped off the noses of six. The victims included
the wife and children of a local Muslim priest.
Both incidents were shockingly brutal. In both cases, the victims
were ordinary Kashmiris. But the way the country, especially the top
leadership, reacted to these two incidents points to the genesis of
the Kashmir problem.
Nadimarg was strongly condemned and rightly so. J&K Chief Minister
Mufti Mohammad Sayeed was summoned to New Delhi and categorically
asked to review his healing touch policy.
He was not only asked to act tough on militancy but the massacre
provoked a review of the entire counter-insurgency grid in the state.
A senior Union home ministry official was tipped to co-ordinate the
counter-insurgency operations. Senior leaders from Deputy PM L.K.
Advani to Congress president Sonia Gandhi rushed to Nadimarg to show
solidarity with the survivors.
Advani told the Pandits who still live in Kashmir that the Centre
would make all possible arrangements if they wished to migrate.
Meanwhile, he promised that his government will do everything to
provide adequate security to them, though he forgot to acknowledge
the way the Muslims had come out to show solidarity with their Hindu
neighbours in Nadimarg. Sonia Gandhi was equally concerned, but again
she forgot that it was essential for her to compliment the Muslim
neighbours in Nadimarg and around Kashmir who had come out to
register their protest, especially as she had come as the chief of a
party that claims to be the custodian of the country's composite
culture and secular ethos.
Ghulam Nabi Azad made two trips to Nadimarg, accompanied by all the
senior Congress ministers in the Mufti government. The media camped
in the otherwise godforsaken village for days.
But the six villagers of Panihad - whose noses were chopped off and
faces disfigured because they were suspected of helping the security
forces - mourned alone.
This is not new to Kashmir. Tragedies have always been
compartmentalised here. The Panihad villagers don't form part of
Advani's or Sonia Gandhi's constituency. If the victims were
sympathisers of the militants or were killed by security forces like
in the Gowkadal, Khanyar, Bijbehara or Sopore massacres, the absence
of a reaction may have been understandable.
But when Muslims are killed in the name of India, it exposes a
pattern of selective condemnation, where the religion of the victim
influences reaction to the tragedy.
Such examples lie scattered from Kupwara to Surankote. One night a
few years ago, a group of unidentified gunmen descended on Sheikhpora
village at Ganderbal. Fourteen men were massacred leaving behind 30
orphans. Ghulam Mohammad Sheikh's family lost all its men, so did
many among his neighbours.
Reason: several of the village men had been actively involved in the
counter-insurgency operations of the security forces. Nobody from
South Block ever came rushing here with even a cosmetic condemnation.
The Kashmir problem is more complex than the twin narratives of
militant violence and security force atrocity would have us believe.
It is bigger than the failure of democratic process and the rigging
of elections. Its epicentre is perhaps in the people's sense of
belonging to the country and its power structures. If the Panihad
villagers or the widows of Sheikhpora fail to relate to India, the
situation doesn't call for a POTA. The problem lies elsewhere.
More information about the reader-list
mailing list