[Reader-list] JAGMOHAN AND THE VALLEY FULL OF SCORPIONS (Posting 3)
meenu gaur
meenugaur at hotmail.com
Fri Mar 7 17:55:18 IST 2003
In this posting I feel itd be worthwhile to remain focused on how and why
the migration of Kashmiri Pandits took place. The events leading up to the
migration have always often come up in all my visits to the Camps. Most
people seem overanxious to fix blame for the migration and convince you of
their own explanation of the events. But most of the time people in the
Camps were eager to see this to mean that the narrative on the migration is
the same even if it speaks itself through different people differently.
People seem anxious to represent the migration as unavoidable. This is
understandable because at times they face hostility in Delhi where people
often cite to them the example of the way the Hindus in Sikh-dominated
Punjab chose to brave the situation rather than flee in the 1980s. When I
attempted to go deeper into the reasons that catalyzed the migration, then
most people seemed to hold the selective killings of the Pandits in early
1989 and early 1990, threats to life and property, the honor and dignity of
the Kashmiri Pandit women, the rise of new militant groups with a virulent
Islamist ideology, some warnings in anonymous posters and unexplained
killings and the helplessness and silence of the State administration as
responsible for the internal displacement of the Kashmiri Pandits. But above
all they seemed to be obsessed with exonerating the then State Governor
Jagmohan from all accusations of complicity in the forced migration of
Kashmiri Pandits which they perceive as the dominant narrative of the
Kashmiri Muslims on the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits.
What is most important to realize is that there is no single narrative on
the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits. There is a multiplicity of narratives which
overdetermines the casuistry of the migration. And we must remember that
even though the migration from Srinagar happened in the first two years of
1990 and 1991; from rural Kashmir the migration happened even as late as
1993 and 1994. Even then hundreds of Kashmiri Pandit families chose to stay
on in the Valley.
The imaginary (at times even spectacular) escape of the Pandits from a
tyrannical Muslim Valley bent on genocide, over the few nights after the
January 19th in the backdrop of Islamic slogans that reverberated from the
mosques of the Valley, is a retroactive memory deeply implicated in
political fantasy (even if one were to recall the fear instilled by the
hysterical loudspeakers from January to March 1990).
This brings us to the controversial role of Jagmohan (Delhis Demolition
Man), the then Governor of J&K State and the present Minister of Tourism in
the Central government of the Hindu nationalist BJP in the forced migration
of Kashmiri Pandits. The simplistic response on the streets of Srinagar to
the question on the migration of Kashmiri Pandits is something like this:
Unko Jagmohan ne nikala (Jagmohan forced the Pandits to leave). Now in the
Camps there is a deep concern to disprove this Jagmohan theory on the
exodus of Kashmiri Pandits-a theory which continues to exert its pressure
on any possible reconciliation between the two communities.
The Camp people feel compelled to defend themselves against this compelling
though absurd conspiracy theory which seems to have so much explanatory
power in the Valley. The Pandits are often accused in the Valley of falling
into the trap laid out for them by Governor Jagmohan and deserting the
Muslims of the Valley to a punitive State and gubernatorial zulm
(oppression).
There is no denying the fact that it is during Governor Jagmohans 1990
tenure that the Valley witnessed the exodus of almost the entire small but
vital Kashmiri Pandit community from the Valley. The Janata Dal-led United
Front Government, supported by the BJP and the Left, chose to send Jagmohan
to the Valley which the latter himself chose to describe in his book, My
Frozen Turbulences in Kashmir, as a Valley full of scorpions. It is widely
quoted and validated even by the members of the Kashmiri Pandit refugee
camps that the Kashmiri Muslim community leaders, Kashmiri political
parties, including some militant organizations, appealed to the Pandits not
to leave the Valley after the selective killings of some prominent Kashmiri
Pandits such as the politician Tikka Lal Taploo (the leader of the RSS in
Kashmir) or the civil servant Lassa Kaul, had instilled fear in the Hindu
minority in Srinagar. Balraj Puri writes in Kashmir: Towards Insurgency
about how the Kashmiri Pandit leader H.N Jatoo had welcomed and endorsed
these appeals but soon migrated to Jammu. Jatoo later told Puri that soon
after the Joint Committee of the prominent members of the two communities
had been set up to deal with the emerging situation, the governor sent a DSP
to him with an air ticket for Jammu with an offer of accommodation and an
advice to leave Kashmir immediately. Even though it is difficult to believe
that a whole community would have left their ancestral homes merely because
Jagmohan urged them to do so, but it is fairly clear that the state
machinery may have helped in the process and done nothing to look at
possibilities that would have stopped it. It is equally difficult to
speculate on how a Joint Committee of community leaders could have protected
the minority community when Kashmiri Muslim leaders and intellectuals such
as Moulvi Farooq and Dr. A A Guru themselves fell to the bullets of
unidentified gunmen. Even then I feel that a process could have been
initiated which could have either delayed or averted the migration.
The narratives in the Camp eulogise Jagmohan as some sort of a saviour.
While the people are critical of the Congress and the BJP for their
opportunism and political manipulation of the Kashmiri Pandit problem, they
reject the argument that Jagmohan had any role to play in abetting the
migrations. Rather most seem thankful for the relief measures, the flat
allotments which Jagmohan managed for them as Urban Development Minister in
the BJP-led Union government and other such measures taken to ease their
suffering.
At the Camps I was told that when the Pandits were leaving the Valley, their
neighbors and friends from the Muslim community urged them not to go, and
ensured them of their safety. One member of the Camp told me that he had
heard that they did this because they felt that once the Hindus left the
Valley the Indian Army would wreck havoc in Kashmir and if the Hindus stayed
back then they would not be able to do that
(
agar Hindu yahan se chalegaye phir yahan par Hindustani fauj bumbaaree
karegee
) He said we (the Kashmiri Pandits) used to think that they are
holding us back as hostages so that they (the Kashmiri Muslims) are more
secure from the Indian security forces. I had been told almost exactly the
same in Kashmir by a young Kashmiri Muslim architect. He said that the
Pandits left the Valley because they were told by Governor Jagmohan that
once they leave the Valley it would be easier for the security forces to
crush the rebellion with brute force. This might well be excessive and have
no real basis but what it does frighteningly put forward is the state of the
psyche of the people from both communities: India and its institutions, the
Army and the paramilitary are seen as Hindu forces that would be unsparing
on a Muslim population however innocent they might be. It is surprising that
it seemed plausible to people from both the communities, unquestioningly so,
that the Muslims of the Valley could only be shielded by the Kashmiri
Pandits from what is their own Army.
The collapse of the Indian State as Hindu by the people in the Camps was as
spontaneous and unquestioning as that by the Muslims of the Valley.
I have chosen to bring this up in my posting as most of my initial
interviews revolved around the more political aspects of the migration.
_________________________________________________________________
Cricket World Cup 2003- News, Views and Match Reports.
http://server1.msn.co.in/msnspecials/worldcup03/
More information about the reader-list
mailing list