[Reader-list] The Vedavatis of this world

[Yousuf]

For those who think VJogi maybe a prankster, the
following info maybe useful:

A person named Vedavati Ravindra Jogi produced a film
for the PSBT, called ONE BY CHANCE, ONE BY CHOICE.
This film is "A look at the predicaments; joys and
difficulties of couples who adopt a second child even
though they have a biological one of their own.

Vedavati is director of Spandan Communications,
producing audio-visual educational films and
multimedia CDs. She has worked with Balchitravani
producing over 50 television programmes for children.

(God save those poor kids)



--- Tapas Ray <tray at cal2.vsnl.net.in> wrote:

> I am a confirmed lurker on this list (as in a few
> others), who prefers
> listening to talking. But I find myself sufficiently
> intrigued by the posts
> of this person, who calls herself/himself "Vedavati
> Jogi", to say a few
> things. I hope people here will pardon me if my post
> shows that I have
> missed something. I do confess that I haven't read
> everything over the last
> few days.
> 
> I am not at all certain that this person is who s/he
> claims to be. Please
> note that the name "Vedavati Jogi" translates as a
> female yogi, who has
> acquired the wisdon of the Vedas ... should have
> been "Jogini", but that
> would have given the game away, and in any case Jogi
> fits in nicely as a
> surname, because we all have heard of Ajit Jogi,
> haven't we? The point here
> is, the name seems too perfect to be real. I suspect
> it has been dreamt up
> by some prankster.
> 
> Please also note this jogi's/jogini's email address
> - vrjogi at hotmail.com.
> Good old Hotmail, which - like scores of other free
> email services - lets
> you assume any name that your fertile brain can
> think up. Not for them the
> rigours of identity and address proof (which I have
> had to provide to VSNL
> before being given an account).
> 
> What may be the nature of the prank? Again, my
> suspicion is that this person
> is playing the devil's advocate. If s/he were
> sincerely advocating the
> devil's cause, I think s/he would have been - well,
> tried to be - a little
> less crude in her/his advocacy.
> 
> Whatever it is - whether or not s/he has her/his
> tongue in her/his cheek -
> would it be too much to ask this person to raise the
> level of her/his
> invectives a little? If s/he does, that will give
> everybody a chance to
> actually discuss things.
> 
> Just a thought - even though this list is not
> moderated, is it not possible
> to bounce someone if she/he makes a nuisance of
> herself/himself?
> 
> Tapas Ray
> 
> 
> > hearty congratulations mr. ashok. you could dare
> to expose these
> > psedosecularists, they are more
> > dangerous than terrorists. can secularism be more
> imporatant than
> > nationalism? i sincerely feel
> > indian secularism is all 'bakwas'. these
> secularists will not mind selling
> > off this country to
> > terrorists because latter happened to be the
> muslims.
> > i am a maharashtrian married to a kashmiri pandit
> who has become regugee
> > in his own country. as
> > they are hindus nobody in interested in their
> welfare because this act
> > will tarnish their secular
> > image. 'talking to pakistan' 'talking to
> terrorists' etc. etc. is secular
> > because they are
> > muslims.   i hate this pseudo secularism i hate
> these secularists.
> > vedavati ravindra jogi
> 
> 
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and
> the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to
> reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in the
> subject header.
> List archive:
> <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com