[Reader-list] what is to be done?
Vivek Narayanan
vivek at sarai.net
Mon Feb 11 12:53:19 IST 2008
Dear Fatima,
Absolutely no personal vendetta intended-- and I find it hard to
understand how you might read what I have written as a "personal
vendetta". I am merely addressing a situation (*without* advocating the
removal of anyone from the list) where the list has lost dozens of
readers who are not easily able to sort through for important
announcements or discussions that they might actually want to
participate in. There have been some important recent events that
members of the reader list have missed because they have not been able
to sort through all the messages.
But I'd like to address a more important and revealing slip in your
email. Once again, you insist on suggesting/ inferring that a set of
posters are residents of "slums" and from non-elite backgrounds based on
their political views and incoherence. Please refrain from making such
assumptions.
Apart from this being very demeaning to a number of non-elites who don't
hold forth with those simplistic views, who don't share those political
views against muslims, etc, and who cannot afford to spam the list with
up to five messages a day because of their lack of internet access--
apart from these kinds of insulting inferences and assumptions, you're
also demonstrably wrong. The members whose posts end up in my bullshit
folder all post with such a great frequency that they must either have
personal broadband access or, at the very least, be spending hundreds of
rupees a day at cybercafes. They are elites themselves.
And, moreover, apart from being wrong, you're playing right into the
hands of these propagandists, who would like to claim that their
anti-muslim and jingoistic views represent the views of "the people",
"the masses", "the non-elite" and so on. They would make the same
claims as you that anyone who believes in equality or questions the
violence of the nation-state or anyone interested in meaningful
discussion beyond simplistic coercive and bullying language must be
elite. So do be careful before your metaphors actually begin to do some
damage.
In fact, I'd rather not get into metaphors, since a metaphor by
definition replaces its object, sometimes making the object harder to
see with clarity, but just for the sake of underlining this, let me
offer a counter-metaphor, even if, like all metaphors, it will distort,
it will fail to represent the situation completely:
what if it is me who is walking on the street. Yes indeed the street
may be dirty, maybe it is strewn with shit and dust but let's say that
the shit doesn't really bother me as much as it seems to bother you. It
really doesn't, even in real life-- if I happen to step in shit while on
my way to work, well, I scrape my shoe against the pavement and I keep
walking. What if I am walking on the street then, enjoying its
productive chaos and its instinctive tolerance for diversity, its
camaraderie. Let's say a limousine passes by with people who are *not*
subaltern, people who are actually quite powerful, maybe they have
access to the police and the security forces and the intelligence
services. Let's say that it is these people in the limousine who can
talk so blithely and simplistically of kicking the muslims out and
defending the nation, because they stand to benefit and because they
would be shielded from the ensuing violence themselves. Let's say that
for some reason you want to try and get in that limousine with them
because you believe that you can actually convince them, that they will
change their minds simply on witnessing the goodness of your heart.
Well, good for you. For my part I already know well what the people in
the limousine have to say, I have heard them out, and I know well that
they have not a jot of respect for me, or you. It's my right to stay
out of that limousine, Fatima. I already know what their views are, and
I know what the costs of those views are.
Vivek
S.Fatima wrote:
> Dear Vivek
> Sorry to sound like this, but some of such mails from
> you reek of elitism. Redirecting some mails to the
> bullshit folder is one thing, but insulting them
> further goes to another level. Isn't that a personal
> vendetta that some on this list are requesting not to
> get into.
> Your calmness is akin to sitting in a limousine which
> is driving through the filthy roads and slums, which
> your darkened windows don't allow you to see.
>
> sf
>
> --- Vivek Narayanan <vivek at sarai.net> wrote:
>
>
>> Strange...
More information about the reader-list
mailing list