[Reader-list] Gates Foundation’s Influence Criticized

[lalitha kamath]

FYI

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/science/16malaria.html?scp=1&sq=kochi&st=nyt



February 16, 2008
Gates Foundation's Influence Criticized
By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.

The chief of malaria for the World Health Organization has complained
that the growing dominance of malaria research by the Bill and Melinda

Gates Foundation risks stifling a diversity of views among scientists
and wiping out the world health agency's policy-making function.

In a memorandum, the malaria chief, Dr. Arata Kochi, complained to his
boss, Dr. Margaret Chan, the director general of the W.H.O., that the

foundation's money, while crucial, could have "far-reaching, largely
unintended consequences."

Many of the world's leading malaria scientists are now "locked up in a
'cartel' with their own research funding being linked to those of

others within the group," Dr. Kochi wrote. Because "each has a vested
interest to safeguard the work of the others," he wrote, getting
independent reviews of research proposals "is becoming increasingly
difficult."


Also, he argued, the foundation's determination to have its favored
research used to guide the health organization's recommendations
"could have implicitly dangerous consequences on the policy-making
process in world health."


Dr. Tadataka Yamada, executive director of global health at the Gates
Foundation, disagreed with Dr. Kochi's conclusions, saying the
foundation did not second-guess or "hold captive" scientists or
research partnerships that it backed. "We encourage a lot of external

review," he said.

The memo, which was obtained by The New York Times, was written late
last year but circulated this week to the heads of several health
agency departments, with a note asking whether they were having

similar struggles with the Gates Foundation.

A spokeswoman for the director general said Dr. Chan saw the memo last
year but did not respond to it. It is "the view of one department, not
the W.H.O.'s view," said the spokeswoman, Christine McNab. The agency

has cordial relations with the foundation, and the agency's policies
are set by committees, which include others besides Gates-financed
scientists, she said.

The Gates Foundation has poured about $1.2 billion into malaria

research since 2000. In the late 1990s, as little as $84 million a
year was spent — largely by the United States military and health
institutes, along with European governments and foundations. Drug
makers had largely abandoned the field. (China was developing a drug,

artemisinin, that is now the cornerstone of treatment.)

The World Health Organization is a United Nations agency with a $4
billion budget. It gives advice on policies, evaluates treatments —
especially for poor countries — maintains a network of laboratories

and sends teams to fight outbreaks of diseases, like avian flu or
Ebola. It finances little research; for diseases of the poor, the
Gates Foundation is the world's biggest donor.

Dr. Kochi, an openly undiplomatic official who won admiration for

reorganizing the world fight against tuberculosis but was ousted from
that job partly because he offended donors like the Rockefeller
Foundation, called the Gates Foundation's decision-making "a closed
internal process, and as far as can be seen, accountable to none other

than itself."

Moreover, he added, the foundation "even takes its vested interest to
seeing the data it helped generate taken to policy."

As an example, he cited an intervention called intermittent preventive

treatment for infants, known as IPTi.

Other experts said IPTi involved giving babies doses of an older anti-
malaria drug, Fansidar, when they got their shots at 2 months, 3
months and 9 months. In early studies, it was shown to decrease

malaria cases about 25 percent. But each dose gave protection for only
a month. Since it is not safe or practical to give Fansidar constantly
to babies because it is a sulfa drug that can cause rare but deadly
reactions and because Fansidar-resistant malaria is growing, World

Health Organization scientists had doubts about it.

Nonetheless, Dr. Kochi wrote, although it was "less and less
straightforward" that the health agency should recommend it, the
agency's objections were met with "intense and aggressive opposition"

from Gates-backed scientists and the foundation. The W.H.O., he wrote,
needs to "stand up to such pressures and ensure that the review of
evidence is rigorously independent of vested interests."

Amir Attaran, a health policy expert at the University of Ottawa who

has criticized many players in the war on malaria, said he thought Dr.
Kochi's memo was "dead right." His own experience with Gates-financed
policy groups, he said, was that they are cowed into "stomach-churning

group think." But Dr. Attaran said he believed that scientists were
not afraid of the foundation, but of its chief of malaria, Dr. Regina
Rabinovich, whom he described as "autocratic."

Dr. Rabinovich, when told of Dr. Attaran's characterization, said she

did not want to respond. Dr. Yamada of the Gates Foundation called it
"unfortunate and inaccurate."

"I'm not a grantee of hers," he said, "but she's an extremely
knowledgeable leader. And if she has an opinion, she's entitled to

it." He said he did not know the details of the IPTi issue, but added
that researchers often differed about policy implications.

There have been hints in recent months that the World Health
Organization feels threatened by the growing power of the Gates

Foundation. Some scientists have said privately that it is "creating
its own W.H.O."

One oft-cited example is its $105 million grant to create the
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of

Washington. Its mission is to judge, for example, which treatments
work or to rank countries' health systems.

These are core W.H.O. tasks, but the institute's new director, Dr.
Christopher J. L. Murray, formerly a health organization official,

said a new path was needed because the United Nations agency came
under pressure from member countries. His said his institute would be
independent of that.




_______________________________________________










      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping