[Reader-list] 2-Amarnath Accord - What A.G.Noorani did not tell you !

Pawan Durani pawan.durani at gmail.com
Sun Sep 7 19:57:43 IST 2008


Dear Shuddha,
It is very obvious of what way you want the discussion to end up. Let me
just share with readers some example.

1. Instead of replying to my post , Mr Shuddha changes the subject to
:Noorani Reads the fine print on Amarnath Accord", while as the original
subject line was "What A.G.Noorani did not tell you".This is the first
impression to understand of how fair Shuddha would have been to understand
my write up, and Shuddha lived upto his reputation for that ....perfectly.

2.When I say that every state subject has an equal right to every inch of
land , that does not mean to buy a piece of land in Srinagar a Ladakhi would
have to go to Assembly to get an order passed. Mr Shuddhas understanding of
the sentence is very poor and childish.

3.Shuddha is not aware of who lives in Baltal ? His understanding of the
area is based on his passionate reading of anti nationalist and Islamist
newspaper like Greater Kashmir and Rising Kashmir. Incidentally rising
Kashmir was inaugurated by Noorani himself. What a coincidence.

4.Shuddha again ignores the report of chief Wildlife warden on allotment of
land and like a "parrot" repeats the Hurriyat language. And if this is how
Shuddha loves to debate without even acknowledging the report of those who
are in-charge of ecology and wildlife in the Baltal area , I wonder no one
would be able to satisfy his brain,which seems to be locked for any
reasoning.

5. What Nitish Sen Gupta had wanted on priority is that on high grounds the
number of pilgrims should be restricted to 20000.

6. Shuddha quotes that KPSS or Sanjay Tikoo wanted his participation. What
Shuddha does not share that Sanjay Tikoo, who happens to be a close friend,
is no less a hostage to the separatists. He has to tow their line. I would
not discuss this issue in detail as this may cause harm to my already
scared community members in Kashmir. Issue like this needs a broader vision
which morons like Shuddha and Gautam Navlakha can not understand.

7. When I was discussing the fundamental right , I wrote " The right to
Equality " which Shuddha very cunningly altered to "Fundamental right to
Movement" ... It was so clever of him to change the whole context and to
ignore the expected discussion of how the 100 crore citizens of India are
being denied the right to be equal as against the state subjects of J&K
state. And let me remind to Mr Shuddha that neither is whole of J&K a tribal
place nor a forest.

8. Shuddha gives a very childish and immature rhetoric statement that the
Amarnath accord violate the fundamental right to movement guaranteed under
Article 19 (A) of the Indian Constitution. Does that mean
that trespassing is no word to exist. Does that mean that I can stroll on
India gate lawns on night between 25th and 26th January. Does that mean I
can stand right next to barbed wire fence on the border? Does that mean I
can ride my bicycle on the runway of an airport. Shuddha has no understand
of where the violation applies and where not ?

9.Mr Shuddha may call me a fool or a charlatan. It does not matter to me . I
know where his heart lies and what the Neo convert believes in.

Pawan Durani


More information about the reader-list mailing list