[Reader-list] a thought

[inder salim]

i also support what Vivek suggested

and those who have faced troubles reading particular mails, may voluntarily
cease to reflect back each others mails,  unless there is something lucid to
convey.

for example, i never reflected Radikarajan's (angry)  posts, and s/he too
may stop reflecting my posts.
but this is only a suggestion.

love
is
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Nazneen Anand Shamsi <
nazoshmasi at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Dear Vivek,
>
> Thank you for a thought provoking post. Undoubtedly yours is perhaps the
> first instance, when we have someone from sarai.net seriously taking up a
> initiative to put in place modalities of engagement, in his personal
> capacity.
>
> I unhesitatingly endorse your move.
>
> Further on, I suggest that the list admin set a deadline of a week's time
> for any discussion on this issue. After  the completion of such a deadline,
> this rule must come into pace. Despite Shuddha's insistence, in this
> morning's riposte to Radhakrishnan's mail, I think, insofar as all of us
> here who are non sarai.net, we expect some sort of initiative from sarai.
> I
> am certainly not in a position, none whatsoever, to dictate the terms of
> engagement but nevertheless, I feel your suggestion needs to be taken up
> seriously by all concerned.
>
> May I suggest that responses that belong to different threads be restricted
> to one post, instead of just one post a day. Regarding content, may I also
> suggest that a provocation and its response must not include any ad
> homenium
> remarks. A similar warning must be issued against any such post, followed
> by
> dismissal.
>
> I would urge everyone one who is a regular sarai express junkie to respond
> to Vivek's timely intervention.
>
> Best
>
> Nazo
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Shahnawaz Khan <fsrnkashmir at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Sounds Good. Amazing if people would be able to hold their trash with
> them
> > for the night.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Aashish Gupta <aashu.gupta20 at gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Completely agreed. Very innovative.
> > > Aashish
> > >  _________________________________________
> > > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> > > Critiques & Collaborations
> > > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> > > subscribe in the subject header.
> > > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> > >
> > _________________________________________
> > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> > Critiques & Collaborations
> > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> > subscribe in the subject header.
> > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> >
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>



-- 

http://indersalim.livejournal.com