[Reader-list] What after MNIC? The MIND, the final frontier.

[Kshmendra Kaul]

Dear Taha
 
I am ignoring the contents of this posting too of yours.

But I do take this opportunity to accuse you yet once again that you are a shamelessly filthy liar.

I say that on the basis of the following words used by you:

""""" Kshmendra Kaul's defense that 'MNIC could be used to weed out terrorists' """"""

I still welcome you (or anyone who has read this thread) to confirm this statement of yours with evidence from what I have written.  I have just called you, yet once again, a shameless filthy liar. Can you prove me wrong?

You also did not have the courage of your convictions to accept my offer that you name some people who can objectively read the full thread and judge whether 'reason' has been used by you or me.

 
Kshmendra


--- On Sun, 4/12/09, Taha Mehmood <2tahamehmood at googlemail.com> wrote:

From: Taha Mehmood <2tahamehmood at googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [Reader-list] What after MNIC? The MIND, the final frontier.
To: kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com
Cc: "reader-list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 10:02 PM

Dear Kshmendra

I refuse to be provoked. You will have to try harder Sir. Could I suggest
calling me a 'shameless filthy liar' was a rather poor attempt. You see.
I would love if each and every member of the reader list read the whole thread
objectively and judge whether your interpretation my 'posts', which was
so clearly articulated in the third mail on this thread, as follows -'One of
the premises on which the support for MNIC is based is that it will help weed
out terrorists.' is -reasonable- or not.

I contend that it is not, furthermore I also contend that there seems to be a
grave error of judgment on your part. No one can reasonably deduce or adduce
from my posts that I have ever implied or suggested or indicated directly or
indirectly that a national identity card will help weed out terrorists. Although
I have implied or suggested or indicated directly or indirectly that a national
identity card will help weed out  'Illegal immigrants' Yes;
'Legitimate Recipients' of State funding; Yes. Gender. Yes; Date of
birth. Yes; Marital Status. Yes; Address Proof. Yes; Photographs. Yes; Biometric
Identification. Yes; Terrorists. NO SIR.

Please go ahead and invite anyone to read and I will be more than happy to
respond.

With warm regards

Taha





Kshmendra Kaul wrote:
> Dear Taha
>  I am ignoring the contents of this posting too of yours.
>  But I do take this opportunity to accuse you for the third time that you
are a shamelessly filthy liar.
>  I say that on the basis of the following words used by you:
>  """"" Kshmendra Kaul's defense that
'MNIC could be used to weed out terrorists'
""""""
>  I still welcome you (or anyone who has read this thread) to confirm this
statement of yours with evidence from what I have written.  I have just called
you, yet once again, a shameless filthy liar. Can you prove me wrong?
>  You also did not have the courage of your convictions to accept my offer
that you name some people who can objectively read the full thread and judge
whether 'reason' has been used by you or me.
>  Kshmendra
> 
> --- On *Sun, 4/12/09, Taha Mehmood /<2tahamehmood at googlemail.com>/*
wrote:
> 
>     From: Taha Mehmood <2tahamehmood at googlemail.com>
>     Subject: Re: [Reader-list] What after MNIC? The MIND, the final
>     frontier.
>     To: kshmendra2005 at yahoo.com
>     Cc: "Taha Mehmood" <2tahamehmood at googlemail.com>,
"reader-list"
>     <reader-list at sarai.net>
>     Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 8:50 PM
> 
>     Dear Kshmendra
> 
>     By now everyone knows that ad hominem argumentation, spiced with
invectives is
>     your forte. I will allow you to compete alone in this department. I
wish you all
>     the best. As for me, I cannot play all the roles of defendant,
prosecutor,
>     witness, jury, judge, correspondent, reporter and the audience. So I
will not
>     judge you. I am a simple researcher Sir and I believe that to drag 
the idea of
>     MINC together with a bizzare thought experiment was not required at
all.
> 
>     However please rest assured that no national identity card can help
weed out
>     terrorists.
> 
>     and no technology can read the mind of terrorists.
> 
>     Any statement which contradict the above is fallacious because it will
 presume
>     before hand who the 'terrorist' is.
> 
>     And a person can only be called a terrorist after an event has
occurred.
>     Evidence related to a conspiracy to commit an unlawful act is
established.
> 
>     So any attempt to frame as simple a thing as a news story as '
What after
>     MNIC? The MIND, the final frontier.' is wrong and uncalled for and
does not
>     fall within the purview of reason.
> 
>     With warm regards
> 
>     Taha
> 
> 
> 
>               
>