[Reader-list] Modi bashing is secularism.!

Venugopalan K M kmvenuannur at gmail.com
Mon Apr 27 15:23:27 IST 2009


On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Venugopalan K M <kmvenuannur at gmail.com>wrote:

> Dear Rajen,
>
> What would you say about the 'expose' in Tehelka, where Modi
> administration's role in denying protection even to  an ex-MP despite
> repeated SOS calls in the crucial hour of chaos was much obvious ?
> (You need that for reference?  I can post it to the list even, let me check
> if it is readily available )
> If you are interested, please go through those innumerable reports and
> links suggesting what was the role of Modi and the sub human hordes who let
> loose terror against Muslims everywhere in Gujarat.
> When you claim  that as many as 200 Hindus were killed in the police
> firing  in the effort of Modi admn to quell the riotous mobs vis vis just
> 90+ Muslims, what sort of thing are you trying to establish in favour of
> Mr.Modi?
> Even if your figures pointing to the Hindu casualty were accepted as true,
> Modi is by no means exonerated in his role in having instigated people to
> communal violence under the pretext of Godhra- which is made out to be a
> 'terrorist attack against karsevaks' by Muslims. There have been two enquiry
> reports contradicting each other in the finding; neither a detailed forensic
> examination of the ill fated (gutted)coach , nor  elucidation of the exact
> identities of people affected by the fire had been made possible, as far as
> I understand.
> (Please correct me if I am going wrong as to  the details...but I am
> convinced that I am not wrong in saying that the BJP and Narendra Modi still
> want to propagate politics of hate and they repent least in having permitted
> or caused to believe people of Hindu community that killing of Muslims is
> revenge to Godhra and the former could do it with  impunity!
> Regards,
> Venu.
>
>
> Why were the identities  of 'karsevaks' who were said to be travelling in
> the ill fated coach of Sabarmati Express never  revealed by the
> administration
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Rajen Uppinangadi <
> rajen882uppinangadi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Taha,
>>
>>   I very much appreciate your scholarly works in MNIC cards, on issues
>> raised by you on the issuance of these cards, amount of hard work and
>> efforts put into dig the information and enlighten the readers of the
>> same.
>>
>>  But human prejudice at play when it comes to talks about Narendra Modi,
>> is
>> my perception, that you seem to have in very big quantity.. Unlike some
>> other leaders of 1984 riots, he did not lead the mobs to riots, he did not
>> visit police stations to get the release of detained rioters, but many
>> blacksheep in media became celebrities by Modi bashing day in and day out,
>> some even got Padma awards for sycophancy of Sonia with Modi bashings.
>>
>>  The truth of the matter is Modi being the chief minister, ordered firing
>> bullets at the rioters, irrespective of the faith, they belonged to, and
>> worst,  over 200 who died were hindus by bullets of the police as against
>> 93
>> muslims. That should put at rest the individuals like Theesta who has
>> brief
>> for rioters and terror accused if they are muslims.? But no, the media
>> went
>> on showing the riotsfootage from archives file display time and again at
>> the
>> time of elections, perhaps thinking that voter is too naive, too ignorant
>> of
>> the strings that are being pulled in media houses. Thus the more the
>> vitriolic media, more votes for BJP, which is branded communal just as
>> Tarun
>> Gogoi had deals with a Attarwala to be in power, Owaisi in "understanding"
>> with Congress, thus proving the point that all those who talk of
>> secularism
>> have different yardstick to measure the "secularism" in vote banks of
>> politics.
>>
>>  In free India, where rule of laws have to be uniform, the rioters if are
>> from "minority" always got the benefits of being in riots from
>> Congress,whether as eioters or as victims,  with MP and or MLA tickets,
>> Gulberg MP was no exception.Jaffer Sharieff in Bangalore is good example
>> of
>> how to breed riots with unemployed youth of the community. Unfortunately
>> all
>> these have seen poetic justice as they live longer than their progeny and
>> suffer most with loss of their loved ones in front of their eyes.
>> Hariprasad, rowdy sheeter of karnataka is the MP who as student leader has
>> enough cases against him of heinous crimes, all washed away once he became
>> MP. All parties have their share of "metal" to cut metal in other parties.
>> But to generalise Modi and have prejudiced view of good governance is not
>> exactly expected of citizens. Modi, true to his oath of office, took
>> action
>> without fear or favour, withiut any favour to any sections of the society,
>> unlike Congress which always gave compensation to victims if they were
>> from
>> one community, as other individuals were too divided to fight for any
>> rights.IN the past 62 years of rule, the citizens have seen the role of
>> Congress and its secular credentials too well, and left parties which had
>> some credibilty, have also lost this, with their recent behaviour in West
>> Bengal for Tasleema, with madani in Kerala, with land scams for
>> industries.
>>
>>
>>
>>   Basic issue here is in democratic governance, religion has no place to
>> pamper the individuals of any faith, if one political party has such
>> tendency it is congress and others have to match to survive in politics
>> which is bad for democracy.
>>
>> Day in day out we saw the english visual media pull out archived footage
>> of
>> riots to please Congress and atleast in every half an hour this was
>> repeated
>> as if the riots had taken place in Gujarath only, and where muslims were
>> rioting such footage was shelved for good.! I wish the media had also
>> shown
>> the zombies who come out on fridays after prayers, intoxicated by hate
>> from
>> the speeches of the mullas, destry the public properties, hurl stones at
>> public transport and injure innocents. Then, only then, the likes of
>> Jaffer
>> sharieff and Owaisi would not dare to have guns in their college campuses
>> run by them.
>>
>> Will ever media do it.? It needs lots of courage and self belief in
>> democracy as these men and women in media are more keen on their bloated
>> egos, their painted faces and shaved underarms, revealing cleavages on tv
>> shows, with the type of designer wear they wear as. celebrities. !
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Rajen.
>> _________________________________________
>> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
>> Critiques & Collaborations
>> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>> subscribe in the subject header.
>> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://venukm.blogspot.com/
>



-- 
http://venukm.blogspot.com/


More information about the reader-list mailing list